Suppr超能文献

AAI 预测患者在治疗过程中的人际行为和话语:依恋知情心理治疗研究的“迈向关系层面”。

AAI predicts patients' in-session interpersonal behavior and discourse: a "move to the level of the relation" for attachment-informed psychotherapy research.

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.

出版信息

Attach Hum Dev. 2014;16(2):192-209. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2013.859161. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

Abstract

There is currently little empirical evidence regarding how patients' attachment patterns manifest in individual psychotherapy. This study compared the in-session discourse of patients classified secure, dismissing, and preoccupied on the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI). Rather than focusing on content or form alone, this study analyzed how patients' discourse elicits and maintains emotional proximity with the therapist. The AAI was administered to 56 patients prior to treatment and one session for each patient was rated with the Patient Attachment Coding System (PACS) by four independent raters, blind to patients' AAI classification. Significant differences were found in the discourse of patients with different attachment patterns. Namely, secure and preoccupied patients showed more contact-seeking behavior than dismissing patients, who avoided emotional proximity more, while preoccupied patients resisted therapists' help more than did secure and dismissing patients. These results suggest that the different attachment patterns may have distinctive manifestations in the psychotherapy process that can be tracked by external observers.

摘要

目前,关于患者的依恋模式如何在个体心理治疗中表现出来,实证证据很少。本研究比较了在成人依恋访谈(AAI)中被分类为安全型、回避型和专注型的患者的会话话语。本研究不仅关注内容或形式,还分析了患者的话语如何引发并维持与治疗师的情感亲近。在治疗前,对 56 名患者进行了 AAI 测试,对每位患者的一次治疗会话,由四名独立的评估者使用患者依恋编码系统(PACS)进行评估,评估者对患者的 AAI 分类不知情。具有不同依恋模式的患者的话语存在显著差异。具体来说,安全型和专注型患者比回避型患者表现出更多的寻求接触的行为,而回避型患者更回避情感亲近,而专注型患者比安全型和回避型患者更抗拒治疗师的帮助。这些结果表明,不同的依恋模式在心理治疗过程中可能有不同的表现,可以被外部观察者跟踪。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验