Cha Dong H, Hesler Stephen P, Cowles Richard S, Vogt Heidrun, Loeb Gregory M, Landolt Peter J
U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Research Service, Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory, 5230 Konnowac Pass Rd., Wapato, WA 98951, USA.
Environ Entomol. 2013 Oct;42(5):1052-60. doi: 10.1603/EN13154.
We determined the attractiveness of a new chemical lure compared with fermented food baits in use for trapping Drosophila suzukii Matsumura, spotted wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae), in Connecticut, New York, and Washington in the United States and at Dossenheim in Germany. The chemical lure (SWD lure) and food baits were compared in two types of traps: the dome trap and a cup trap. Regardless of trap type, numbers of male and female D. suzukii trapped were greater with the SWD lure compared with apple cider vinegar (ACV) baits at the Washington and New York sites, and were comparable with numbers of D. suzukii captured with a wine plus vinegar bait (W + V) at Germany site and a combination bait meant to mimic W + V at the Connecticut site. Averaged over both types of attractants, the numbers of D. suzukii captured were greater in dome traps than in cup traps in New York and Connecticut for both male and female D. suzukii and in Washington for male D. suzukii. No such differences were found between trap types at the Washington site for female and Germany for male and female D. suzukii. Assessments were also made of the number of large (>0.5 cm) and small (<0.5 cm) nontarget flies trapped. The SWD lure captured fewer nontarget small flies and more large flies compared with ACV bait in New York and fewer nontarget small flies compared with W + V in Germany, although no such differences were found in Washington for the SWD lure versus ACV bait and in Connecticut for the SWD lure versus the combination bait, indicating that these effects are likely influenced by the local nontarget insect community active at the time of trapping. In New York, Connecticut, and Germany, dome traps caught more nontarget flies compared with cup traps. Our results suggest that the four-component SWD chemical lure is an effective attractant for D. suzukii and could be used in place of fermented food-type baits.
我们在美国康涅狄格州、纽约州和华盛顿州以及德国多森海姆,比较了一种新型化学诱剂与用于诱捕铃木氏果蝇(Drosophila suzukii Matsumura)(斑翅果蝇,双翅目:果蝇科)的发酵食物诱饵的吸引力。在两种诱捕器中比较了这种化学诱剂(SWD诱剂)和食物诱饵:圆顶诱捕器和杯形诱捕器。无论诱捕器类型如何,在华盛顿州和纽约州的地点,与苹果醋(ACV)诱饵相比,使用SWD诱剂捕获的铃木氏果蝇的雄性和雌性数量更多,在德国的地点与用葡萄酒加醋诱饵(W + V)捕获的铃木氏果蝇数量相当,在康涅狄格州的地点与模仿W + V的组合诱饵捕获的数量相当。在纽约州和康涅狄格州,对于铃木氏果蝇的雄性和雌性以及在华盛顿州对于铃木氏果蝇的雄性,平均在两种类型的引诱剂中,在圆顶诱捕器中捕获的铃木氏果蝇数量比在杯形诱捕器中更多。在华盛顿州的雌性以及在德国的铃木氏果蝇的雄性和雌性中,未发现诱捕器类型之间存在此类差异。还评估了捕获的大型(>0.5厘米)和小型(<0.5厘米)非目标果蝇的数量。在纽约州,与ACV诱饵相比,SWD诱剂捕获的非目标小型果蝇较少,大型果蝇较多;在德国,与W + V相比,SWD诱剂捕获的非目标小型果蝇较少,尽管在华盛顿州SWD诱剂与ACV诱饵之间以及在康涅狄格州SWD诱剂与组合诱饵之间未发现此类差异,这表明这些影响可能受诱捕时活跃的当地非目标昆虫群落的影响。在纽约州、康涅狄格州和德国,与杯形诱捕器相比,圆顶诱捕器捕获的非目标果蝇更多。我们的结果表明,四成分的SWD化学诱剂是铃木氏果蝇的有效引诱剂,可用于替代发酵食物型诱饵。