Suppr超能文献

新的基于呼吸幅度的门控技术对上腹部 PET 病变评估的影响。

Impact of a new respiratory amplitude-based gating technique in evaluation of upper abdominal PET lesions.

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Monaco, Monaco.

Department of Medical Physics, Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Monaco, Monaco.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2014 Mar;83(3):509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Nov 24.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

PET acquisition requires several minutes which can lead to respiratory motion blurring, to increase partial volume effect and SUV under-estimation. To avoid these artifacts, conventional 10-min phase-based respiratory gating (PBRG) can be performed but is time-consuming and difficult with a non-compliant patient. We evaluated an automatic amplitude-based gating method (AABG) which keeps 35% of the counts at the end of expiration to minimize respiratory motion. We estimated the impact of AABG on upper abdominal lesion detectability, quantification and patient management.

METHODS

We consecutively included 31 patients (82 hepatic and 25 perihepatic known lesions). Each patient underwent 3 acquisitions on a Siemens Biograph mCT (4 rings and time-of-flight): a standard free-breathing whole-body (SWB, 5-7 steps/2.5 min per step, 3.3±0.4 MBq/kg of 18F-FDG), a 10-min PBRG with six bins and a 5-min AABG method. All gated acquisitions were performed with an ANZAI respiratory gating system. SUVmax and target to background ratio (TBR, defined as the maximum SUV of the lesion divided by the mean SUV of a region of interest drawn in healthy liver) were compared.

RESULTS

All 94 lesions in SWB images were detected in the gated images. 10-min PBRG and 5-min AABG acquisitions respectively revealed 9 and 13 new lesions and relocated 7 and 8 lesions. Four lesions revealed by 5-min AABG were missed by 10-min PBRG in 3 non-compliant patients. Both gated methods failed to relocate 2 lesions seen on SWB acquisition. Compared to SWB, TBR increased significantly with 10-min PBRG and with 5-min AABG (respectively 41±59%, p=4.10-3 and 66±75%, p=6.10-5) whereas SUVmax did not (respectively 14±43%, p=0.29 with 10-min PBRG, and 24±46%, p=0.11 with 5-min AABG).

CONCLUSION

The AABG is a fast and a user-friendly respiratory gating method to increase detectability and quantification of upper abdominal lesions compared to the conventional PBRG procedure and the SWB acquisition.

摘要

目的

评估一种自动幅度门控方法(AABG),该方法在呼气末期保持 35%的计数,以最大限度地减少呼吸运动。我们估计 AABG 对上腹部病变的检出率、定量和患者管理的影响。

方法

我们连续纳入 31 例患者(82 例肝内和 25 例肝周已知病变)。每位患者均在西门子 Biograph mCT 上进行 3 次采集(4 个环和飞行时间):标准自由呼吸全身(SWB,5-7 步/2.5 分钟/步,3.3±0.4 MBq/kg 的 18F-FDG)、10 分钟 PBRG 六-bin 采集和 5 分钟 AABG 方法。所有门控采集均使用 ANZAI 呼吸门控系统进行。比较 SUVmax 和靶与背景比(TBR,定义为病变的最大 SUV 除以在健康肝脏中绘制的感兴趣区域的平均 SUV)。

结果

SWB 图像中的所有 94 个病变均在门控图像中检出。10 分钟 PBRG 和 5 分钟 AABG 采集分别显示了 9 个和 13 个新病变,并重新定位了 7 个和 8 个病变。在 3 名不配合的患者中,5 分钟 AABG 显示的 4 个病变被 10 分钟 PBRG 遗漏。两种门控方法均未能重新定位 SWB 采集时发现的 2 个病变。与 SWB 相比,10 分钟 PBRG 和 5 分钟 AABG 时 TBR 显著增加(分别为 41±59%,p=4.10-3 和 66±75%,p=6.10-5),而 SUVmax 无显著变化(分别为 14±43%,p=0.29 时 10 分钟 PBRG,和 24±46%,p=0.11 时 5 分钟 AABG)。

结论

与传统的 PBRG 程序和 SWB 采集相比,AABG 是一种快速、用户友好的呼吸门控方法,可提高上腹部病变的检出率和定量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验