Centre for Public Health, Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool L3 2ET, UK.
Centre for Public Health, Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool L3 2ET, UK.
Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Mar;25(2):204-11. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
BACKGROUND: Many developed countries are facing a major challenge to improve identification of individuals acutely and chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We explored the views and experiences of people who inject drugs (PWID) in relation to HCV testing, and diagnosis through a review and synthesis of qualitative research. METHODS: Based on the thematic synthesis of qualitative research. Searches were conducted in 14 databases and supplemented by reference checking, hand searching of selected journals, and searches of relevant websites. Studies of any qualitative design that examined the views and experiences of, and attitudes towards, HCV testing and diagnosis among PWID or practitioners involved in their care were included. Key themes and sub-themes were systematically coded according to the meaning and content of the findings of each study which proceeded to the preparation of a narrative account of the synthesis. RESULTS: 28 qualitative studies were identified. We identified a number of overarching descriptive themes in the literature, finding overall that PWID hold complex and differing views and experiences of testing and diagnosis. Three major themes emerged: missed opportunities for the provision of information and knowledge; shifting priorities between HCV testing and other needs; and testing as unexpected and routine. Evidence of missed opportunities for the provision of knowledge and information about HCV were clear, contributing to delays in seeking testing and providing a context to poor experiences of diagnosis. Influenced by the nature of their personal circumstances, perceptions of the risk associated with HCV and the prioritisation of other needs acted both to encourage and discourage the uptake of HCV testing. Undergoing HCV testing as part of routine health assessment, and an unawareness of being testing was common. An unexpected positive diagnosis exacerbated anxiety and confusion. CONCLUSION: This review has identified that there are modifiable factors that affect the uptake of HCV testing and experiences of HCV diagnosis among PWID. Intervention development should focus on addressing these factors. There is a need for further research that engages PWID from a diverse range of populations to identify interventions, strategies and approaches that they consider valuable.
背景:许多发达国家都面临着一项重大挑战,即提高对急性和慢性丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) 感染个体的识别能力。我们通过对定性研究的回顾和综合,探讨了吸毒者(PWID)对 HCV 检测和诊断的看法和经验。
方法:基于定性研究的主题综合。在 14 个数据库中进行了检索,并通过参考文献检查、有选择地查阅期刊和相关网站的检索进行了补充。纳入了任何定性设计的研究,这些研究检查了 PWID 或参与其护理的从业者对 HCV 检测和诊断的看法、经验和态度。根据每项研究结果的意义和内容,对主要主题和子主题进行系统编码,随后准备综合叙述性报告。
结果:确定了 28 项定性研究。我们在文献中发现了一些总体描述性主题,总体而言,PWID 对检测和诊断持有复杂和不同的看法和经验。三个主要主题出现了:提供信息和知识的机会被错过;HCV 检测与其他需求之间的优先事项发生变化;以及检测既出乎意料又例行公事。关于 HCV 的知识提供明显存在错失机会的证据,导致延迟寻求检测,并为诊断不良体验提供了背景。受个人情况的性质、对 HCV 相关风险的看法以及其他需求的优先级的影响,既鼓励又阻碍了 HCV 检测的采用。作为常规健康评估的一部分进行 HCV 检测,以及对正在接受检测不知情的情况很常见。出乎意料的阳性诊断加剧了焦虑和困惑。
结论:本综述确定了影响 PWID 接受 HCV 检测和 HCV 诊断经验的可改变因素。干预措施的制定应侧重于解决这些因素。需要进一步研究,让来自不同人群的 PWID 参与,以确定他们认为有价值的干预措施、策略和方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-20
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-10-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-10-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-10-27
BMC Infect Dis. 2021-3-5