Suppr超能文献

内镜对近端锯齿状病变的检测和无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉的病理鉴定因中心而异。

Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of center.

机构信息

Seattle, Washington.

University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jul;12(7):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.11.034. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated rates of detection of proximal serrated lesions in a cohort of average-risk patients undergoing screening colonoscopies.

METHODS

We reviewed results from screening colonoscopies performed by attending gastroenterologists at 32 endoscopy centers from 2008-2010. Pathology slides were interpreted at the individual centers. For this analysis, serrated lesions included hyperplastic polyps larger than 10 mm, those interpreted as sessile serrated adenomas (or sessile serrated polyp), and traditional serrated adenomas. Rates of detection for conventional adenomas and serrated lesions were compared among centers.

RESULTS

A total of 5778 lesions were detected in 7215 screening colonoscopies. Of the 5548 lesions with pathology results, 3008 (54.2%) were conventional adenomas, 350 (6.3%) were serrated, and 232 (4.2%) were proximal serrated. The proportion of colonoscopies with at least 1 proximal serrated lesion was 2.8% (range among centers, 0%-9.8%). The number of serrated lesions per colonoscopy ranged from 0.00-0.11 (average, 0.05 ± 0.25). Overall lesion detection rates correlated with proximal serrated lesion detection rates (R = 0.91, P < .0001); conventional adenoma and proximal serrated lesion detection rates also correlated (R = .43, P = .025). The detection rate of proximal serrated lesions differed significantly among centers (P < .0001); odds ratios for detection ranged from 0-0.79. Some centers' pathologists never identified proximal serrated lesions as sessile serrated adenomas/polyps.

CONCLUSIONS

In an average-risk screening cohort, detection of proximal serrated lesions varied greatly among endoscopy centers. There was also substantial variation among pathologists in identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Nationally, a significant proportion of proximal serrated lesions may be missed during colonoscopy examination or incorrectly identified during pathology assessment. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT00855348.

摘要

背景与目的

我们调查了在一组接受筛查性结肠镜检查的平均风险患者中近端锯齿状病变的检出率。

方法

我们回顾了 2008 年至 2010 年期间 32 个内镜中心由主治胃肠病学家进行的筛查性结肠镜检查的结果。病理切片在各个中心进行解读。在这项分析中,锯齿状病变包括大于 10mm 的增生性息肉、被解读为无蒂锯齿状腺瘤(或无蒂锯齿状息肉)和传统锯齿状腺瘤。我们比较了各中心中常规腺瘤和锯齿状病变的检出率。

结果

在 7215 例筛查性结肠镜检查中,共发现 5778 个病变。在有病理结果的 5548 个病变中,3008 个(54.2%)为常规腺瘤,350 个(6.3%)为锯齿状病变,232 个(4.2%)为近端锯齿状病变。至少检出 1 个近端锯齿状病变的结肠镜检查比例为 2.8%(各中心范围为 0%-9.8%)。每例结肠镜检查检出的锯齿状病变数量为 0.00-0.11 个(平均 0.05±0.25 个)。总的病变检出率与近端锯齿状病变检出率相关(R=0.91,P<0.0001);常规腺瘤和近端锯齿状病变的检出率也相关(R=0.43,P=0.025)。各中心近端锯齿状病变的检出率差异有统计学意义(P<0.0001);检出率比值范围为 0-0.79。一些中心的病理学家从未将近端锯齿状病变识别为无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉。

结论

在平均风险筛查队列中,各内镜中心近端锯齿状病变的检出率差异很大。病理学家在识别无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉方面也存在很大差异。在全国范围内,大量的近端锯齿状病变可能在结肠镜检查过程中被遗漏或在病理评估中被错误识别。临床试验注册号:NCT00855348。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验