• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个不稳定的方向坡度:个体在将坡度用作方向线索方面的差异。

A slippery directional slope: Individual differences in using slope as a directional cue.

作者信息

Weisberg Steven M, Newcombe Nora S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA,

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2014 May;42(4):648-61. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0387-5.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-013-0387-5
PMID:24338529
Abstract

Navigators rely on many different types of cues to build representations of large-scale spaces. Sloped terrain is an important cue that has received recent attention in comparative and human spatial research. However, the studies to date have been unable to determine how directional slope information leads to more accurate spatial representations. Moreover, whereas some studies have shown that the inclusion of slope cues improves performance on spatial tasks across participants (Kelly, 2011; Restat, Steck, Mochnatzki, & Mallot, 2004), other research has suggested individual differences in the benefits of slope cues (Chai & Jacobs, 2010; Nardi, Newcombe, & Shipley, 2011). We sought to clarify the role of sloped terrain in improving the representation of large-scale environments. In Experiment 1, participants learned the layout of buildings in one of two desktop virtual environments: either a directionally sloped terrain or a completely flat one. Participants in the sloped environment outperformed those in the flat environment. However, participants used slope information as an additional cue, rather than as a preferred reference direction. In Experiment 2, the two virtual environments were again either flat or sloped, but we increased the complexity of the relations between the slope and the path. In this experiment, better performance in the sloped environment was only seen for participants with good self-reported senses of direction. Taken together, the studies show that slope provides useful information for building environmental representations in simple cases, but that individual differences emerge in more complex situations. We suggest that good and bad navigators use different navigational strategies.

摘要

导航者依靠多种不同类型的线索来构建对大规模空间的表征。倾斜地形是一个重要的线索,最近在比较和人类空间研究中受到了关注。然而,迄今为止的研究尚未能够确定方向倾斜信息是如何导致更准确的空间表征的。此外,虽然一些研究表明,纳入倾斜线索可以提高参与者在空间任务上的表现(凯利,2011年;雷萨特、施泰克、莫赫纳茨基和马洛特,2004年),但其他研究表明,倾斜线索的益处存在个体差异(柴和雅各布斯,2010年;纳尔迪、纽科姆和希普利,2011年)。我们试图阐明倾斜地形在改善大规模环境表征中的作用。在实验1中,参与者在两个桌面虚拟环境之一中学习建筑物的布局:要么是有方向倾斜的地形,要么是完全平坦的地形。倾斜环境中的参与者表现优于平坦环境中的参与者。然而,参与者将倾斜信息用作额外的线索,而不是首选的参考方向。在实验2中,两个虚拟环境再次要么是平坦的,要么是倾斜的,但我们增加了倾斜与路径之间关系的复杂性。在这个实验中,只有那些自我报告方向感良好的参与者在倾斜环境中表现更好。综合来看,这些研究表明,在简单情况下,倾斜为构建环境表征提供了有用的信息,但在更复杂的情况下会出现个体差异。我们认为,优秀和糟糕的导航者使用不同的导航策略。

相似文献

1
A slippery directional slope: Individual differences in using slope as a directional cue.一个不稳定的方向坡度:个体在将坡度用作方向线索方面的差异。
Mem Cognit. 2014 May;42(4):648-61. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0387-5.
2
How do (some) people make a cognitive map? Routes, places, and working memory.(一些)人是如何制作认知地图的?路线、地点和工作记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 May;42(5):768-785. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000200. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
3
Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differences in navigation.认知地图的差异:理解导航中的个体差异。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):669-682. doi: 10.1037/a0035261. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
4
Cue interaction between buildings and street configurations during reorientation in familiar and unfamiliar outdoor environments.在熟悉和不熟悉的户外环境中重新定向时,建筑物与街道布局之间的线索交互。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Apr;44(4):631-644. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000478. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
5
Up by upwest: Is slope like north?向上到西部:坡度像北方吗?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 Oct;67(10):1959-76. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.880122. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
6
Spatial reorientation with non-visual cues: Failure to spontaneously use auditory information.利用非视觉线索进行空间重新定向:无法自发利用听觉信息。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 May;72(5):1141-1154. doi: 10.1177/1747021818780715. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
7
Cue combination in human spatial navigation.人类空间导航中的线索组合
Cogn Psychol. 2017 Jun;95:105-144. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 May 4.
8
Where is uphill? Exploring sex differences when reorienting on a sloped environment presented through 2-D images.上坡在哪里?通过二维图像呈现倾斜环境时重新定向过程中的性别差异探究。
Perception. 2014;43(4):249-64. doi: 10.1068/p7622.
9
Reorienting with terrain slope and landmarks.根据地形坡度和地标重新定向。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Feb;41(2):214-28. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0254-9.
10
Learning efficiency: The influence of cue salience during spatial navigation.学习效率:空间导航过程中线索显著性的影响。
Behav Processes. 2015 Jul;116:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Structuring Knowledge with Cognitive Maps and Cognitive Graphs.用认知图和认知图构建知识。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Jan;25(1):37-54. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
2
Manipulating the visibility of barriers to improve spatial navigation efficiency and cognitive mapping.操纵障碍的可见性以提高空间导航效率和认知绘图。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 9;9(1):11567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48098-0.
3
A meta-analysis of sex differences in human navigation skills.人类导航技能性别差异的荟萃分析。

本文引用的文献

1
Are all types of vertical information created equal?垂直信息的所有类型都一样吗?
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Oct;36(5):568-9; discussion 571-87. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13000599.
2
Global frames of reference organize configural knowledge of paths.全球参照系组织路径的整体知识。
Cognition. 2013 Oct;129(1):180-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
3
Reorienting with terrain slope and landmarks.根据地形坡度和地标重新定向。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Oct;26(5):1503-1528. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01633-6.
4
No advantage for remembering horizontal over vertical spatial locations learned from a single viewpoint.从单一视角学习水平空间位置与垂直空间位置相比,在记忆方面没有优势。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jan;46(1):158-171. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0753-9.
5
Sex differences and errors in the use of terrain slope for navigation.性别差异与利用地形坡度进行导航时的误差
Cogn Process. 2015 Sep;16 Suppl 1:323-6. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0669-x.
Mem Cognit. 2013 Feb;41(2):214-28. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0254-9.
4
Head for the hills: the influence of environmental slant on spatial memory organization.奔向山丘:环境倾斜对空间记忆组织的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):774-80. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0100-2.
5
Keeping track of the distance from home by leaky integration along veering paths.通过在转向路径上的漏积分来跟踪离家的距离。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jul;212(1):81-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2696-x. Epub 2011 May 1.
6
The world is not flat: can people reorient using slope?世界并非平坦的:人们能否通过坡度重新定位?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):354-67. doi: 10.1037/a0021614.
7
Slope-driven goal location behavior in pigeons.鸽子中由斜率驱动的目标定位行为。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Oct;36(4):430-42. doi: 10.1037/a0019234.
8
What determines our navigational abilities?是什么决定了我们的导航能力?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Mar;14(3):138-46. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
9
Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory.线索类型对人类空间记忆性别差异的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Apr 2;208(2):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.11.039. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
10
Dissociable neural circuits for encoding and retrieval of object locations during active navigation in humans.人类主动导航过程中目标位置的编码和检索所涉及的分离神经回路。
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2816-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.021. Epub 2009 Oct 22.