Elder B L, Smith T F
Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 Feb;87(2):230-5. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/87.2.230.
The Cytomegelisa IgM assay (M. A. Bioproducts, Walkersville, MD) was evaluated as an alternative to indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) testing of QAE-Sephadex A50-treated sera for detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific IgM. The Cytomegelisa assay was consistently more sensitive than IFA testing for detection of CMV-specific IgM. Of 101 rheumatoid factor-negative sera that were IFA positive before column separation, only 47 (46%) remained positive after column separation, while 72 (71%) were positive using Cytomegelisa. Nine transplant patients who had primary CMV infection develop were also evaluated. Two of the nine did not form sufficient IgM to remain IFA positive after column separation, however, all had IgM detected by Cytomegelisa. In all cases, Cytomegelisa provided laboratory evidence of CMV infection earlier or at the same time as IgG seroconversion or IgM testing by column/IFA. Comparison of both methods with 100 consecutive sera received for CMV testing yielded five sera positive for CMV-IgM with the column/IFA method and 20 using Cytomegelisa. The specificity of Cytomegelisa was evaluated with 56 RF-positive/CMV IgG-positive sera. Four of 56 (7%) appeared positive after column separation; however, of concern, 22 of 56 (39%) remained positive in the Cytomegelisa.
对Cytomegelisa IgM检测法(M.A.生物制品公司,马里兰州沃克斯维尔)进行了评估,以替代对经QAE-葡聚糖A50处理的血清进行间接荧光抗体(IFA)检测,用于检测巨细胞病毒(CMV)特异性IgM。在检测CMV特异性IgM方面,Cytomegelisa检测法始终比IFA检测法更灵敏。在101份类风湿因子阴性且柱分离前IFA检测呈阳性的血清中,柱分离后只有47份(46%)仍为阳性,而使用Cytomegelisa检测法时72份(71%)为阳性。还对9例发生原发性CMV感染的移植患者进行了评估。9例中有2例在柱分离后未形成足够的IgM以保持IFA检测呈阳性,然而,所有患者的IgM均能被Cytomegelisa检测到。在所有病例中,Cytomegelisa比柱/IFA法检测IgG血清转化或IgM更早或同时提供CMV感染的实验室证据。用100份连续送检进行CMV检测的血清对两种方法进行比较,柱/IFA法检测出5份CMV-IgM阳性血清,而Cytomegelisa检测法检测出20份。用56份RF阳性/CMV IgG阳性血清评估了Cytomegelisa的特异性。56份中有4份(7%)在柱分离后呈阳性;然而,令人担忧的是,56份中有22份(39%)在Cytomegelisa检测中仍为阳性。