Kangro H O, Booth J C, Bakir T M, Tryhorn Y, Sutherland S
J Med Virol. 1984;14(1):73-80. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890140111.
The sensitivity and specificity of direct antibody radioimmunoassay (RIA), M-antibody capture RIA (MACRIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) test for the detection of CMV-specific IgM was compared using 40 sera selected from different groups of patients. RIA, MACRIA, and ELISA gave concordant results with thirty-two sera but discordant results with eight sera, of which three were cord sera from congenitally infected babies, three were from immunocompromised patients with recurrent CMV infections, and two were from patients with lymphadenopathy and Paul-Bunnell-positive mononucleosis, respectively. RIA, MACRIA, and ELISA were of similar sensitivity with sera from adult patients, but ELISA was apparently less sensitive than RIA and MACRIA for the detection of CMV IgM in cord serum. By comparison IFA was significantly less sensitive than the other three tests. Rheumatoid factor is reactive in RIA, ELISA, and IFA but can efficiently be removed by absorption with latex-IgG beads or cross-linked human IgG.
采用从不同患者组中选取的40份血清,比较了直接抗体放射免疫测定法(RIA)、M抗体捕获RIA(MACRIA)、酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)以及免疫荧光抗体(IFA)检测巨细胞病毒特异性IgM的敏感性和特异性。RIA、MACRIA和ELISA对32份血清检测结果一致,但对8份血清检测结果不一致,其中3份是先天性感染婴儿的脐带血清,3份来自复发性巨细胞病毒感染的免疫受损患者,另外2份分别来自淋巴结病患者和保罗-邦内尔试验阳性的单核细胞增多症患者。RIA、MACRIA和ELISA对成年患者血清的敏感性相似,但ELISA检测脐带血清中巨细胞病毒IgM的敏感性明显低于RIA和MACRIA。相比之下,IFA的敏感性显著低于其他三种检测方法。类风湿因子在RIA、ELISA和IFA中具有反应性,但可用乳胶IgG珠或交联人IgG吸附有效去除。