• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康成年人双下肢降低试验及下腹部肌肉进展对核心稳定训练计划的反应性:一项初步研究。

Responsiveness of the double limb lowering test and lower abdominal muscle progression to core stabilization exercise programs in healthy adults: a pilot study.

作者信息

Haladay Douglas E, Miller Sayers J, Challis John H, Denegar Craig R

机构信息

1School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; 2Department of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University; and 3Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jul;28(7):1920-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000336.

DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000336
PMID:24343322
Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent and expensive health care problems in the United States. Studies suggest that stabilization exercise may be effective in the management of people with LBP. To accurately assess the effect of stabilization programs on muscle performance, clinicians need an objective measure that is both valid and reliable. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the double limb lowering test (DLLT) and lower abdominal muscle progression (LAMP) can detect a change in abdominal muscle performance after stabilization exercises. Eleven healthy participants (4 men and 7 women) were randomly assigned to either a specific stabilization exercise (SSE) or general stabilization exercise (GSE) group and were evaluated by the DLLT and LAMP before, during, and at the end of 8 weeks of training. Subjects attended exercise sessions twice per week over 8 weeks. No significant difference in pretest performance existed between the 2 groups. No significant difference was detected with the DLLT for either the SSE or GSE over time or when groups were combined. The LAMP detected a significant difference for the combined groups and GSE but not SSE over time. These data indicate that the LAMP is sensitive to change after a spinal stabilization program, whereas the DLLT does not detect a change after these programs. Furthermore, the GSE was more effective in producing these changes. Additional testing of these assessments is necessary to further validate these tests and to identify specific populations for which these tests may be most appropriate.

摘要

下背痛(LBP)是美国最普遍且花费高昂的医疗保健问题之一。研究表明,稳定化训练可能对下背痛患者的管理有效。为了准确评估稳定化训练计划对肌肉性能的影响,临床医生需要一种既有效又可靠的客观测量方法。本研究的目的是确定双下肢下降试验(DLLT)和下腹部肌肉进展测试(LAMP)能否检测出稳定化训练后腹部肌肉性能的变化。11名健康参与者(4名男性和7名女性)被随机分配到特定稳定化训练(SSE)组或一般稳定化训练(GSE)组,并在8周训练前、训练期间和训练结束时通过DLLT和LAMP进行评估。受试者在8周内每周参加两次训练课程。两组在预测试表现上没有显著差异。随着时间的推移,无论是SSE组还是GSE组,单独或合并来看,DLLT均未检测到显著差异。随着时间的推移,LAMP在合并组和GSE组中检测到显著差异,但在SSE组中未检测到。这些数据表明,LAMP对脊柱稳定化训练后的变化敏感,而DLLT在这些训练后未检测到变化。此外,GSE在产生这些变化方面更有效。有必要对这些评估进行额外测试,以进一步验证这些测试,并确定这些测试可能最适合的特定人群。

相似文献

1
Responsiveness of the double limb lowering test and lower abdominal muscle progression to core stabilization exercise programs in healthy adults: a pilot study.健康成年人双下肢降低试验及下腹部肌肉进展对核心稳定训练计划的反应性:一项初步研究。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jul;28(7):1920-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000336.
2
Electromyographic and kinetic analysis of two abdominal muscle performance tests.两种腹肌性能测试的肌电图和动力学分析
Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(8):587-93. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2015.1062945. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
3
Abdominal muscle performance as measured by the double leg-lowering test.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jul;86(7):1345-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.020.
4
Core stability exercises in individuals with and without chronic nonspecific low back pain.慢性非特异性下腰痛患者和无腰痛患者的核心稳定性练习。
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Dec;25(12):3404-11. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318215fc49.
5
Effects of sit-up training versus core stabilization exercises on sit-up performance.仰卧起坐训练与核心稳定性训练对仰卧起坐表现的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Nov;41(11):2072-83. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a84db2.
6
Trunk muscle stabilization training plus general exercise versus general exercise only: randomized controlled trial of patients with recurrent low back pain.躯干肌稳定训练加常规运动与单纯常规运动的比较:复发性下腰痛患者的随机对照试验
Phys Ther. 2005 Mar;85(3):209-25.
7
Effects of combining whole-body vibration with exercise on the consequences of detraining on muscle performance in untrained adults.全身振动结合运动对未训练成年人停训后肌肉性能结果的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Apr;27(4):1074-82. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31826520af.
8
Core stabilization exercises enhance lactate clearance following high-intensity exercise.
J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Nov;21(4):1305-9. doi: 10.1519/R-21546.1.
9
Core muscle activation during dynamic upper limb exercises in women.女性上肢动态运动中的核心肌肉激活。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Dec;26(12):3217-24. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318248ad54.
10
Ten-year follow-up of strengthening versus flexibility exercises with or without abdominal bracing in recurrent low back pain.复发性腰痛患者进行强化训练与灵活性训练并搭配或不搭配腹部支撑的十年随访研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jun 1;39(13):997-1003. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000338.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance on a Motor Control Test in an Asymptomatic Adolescent Population.无症状青少年群体在运动控制测试中的表现。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Feb 1;17(2):156-163. doi: 10.26603/001c.31042. eCollection 2022.
2
Lumbopelvic motor control function between patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls: a useful distinguishing tool: The STROBE study.慢性下腰痛患者与健康对照者之间的腰骶部运动控制功能:一种有用的鉴别工具:STROBE研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(15):e19621. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019621.
3
PROSPECTIVE FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE TESTING AND RELATIONSHIP TO LOWER EXTREMITY INJURY INCIDENCE IN ADOLESCENT SPORTS PARTICIPANTS.
青少年体育参与者的前瞻性功能性能测试及其与下肢损伤发生率的关系
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Apr;12(2):206-218.