• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

约会暴力幸存者对情绪化面部表情的注意偏向。

Attentional bias towards emotional facial expressions in survivors of dating violence.

作者信息

Lee Jeong-Ha, Lee Jang-Han

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Chung-Ang University , Seoul , Korea.

出版信息

Cogn Emot. 2014;28(6):1127-36. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.867834. Epub 2013 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1080/02699931.2013.867834
PMID:24344766
Abstract

This study identified components of attentional bias (e.g. attentional vigilance, attentional avoidance and difficulty with disengagement) that are critical characteristics of survivors of dating violence (DV). Eye movements were recorded to obtain accurate and continuous information regarding attention. DV survivors with high post-traumatic stress symptoms (DV-High PTSS group; n = 20) and low post-traumatic stress symptoms (DV-Low PTSS group; n = 22) and participants who had never experienced DV (NDV group; n = 21) were shown screens displaying emotional (angry, fearful and happy) faces paired with neutral faces and negative (angry and fearful) faces paired with happy faces for 10 s. The results indicate that the DV-High PTSS group spent longer dwelling on angry faces over time compared with the DV-Low PTSS and NDV groups. This result implies that the DV-High PTSS group focused on specific trauma-related stimuli but does not provide evidence of an attentional bias towards threatening stimuli in general.

摘要

本研究确定了注意偏向的组成部分(如注意警觉、注意回避和脱离困难),这些是约会暴力(DV)幸存者的关键特征。记录眼球运动以获取有关注意力的准确且连续的信息。向患有高创伤后应激症状的DV幸存者(DV-高PTSS组;n = 20)、低创伤后应激症状的DV幸存者(DV-低PTSS组;n = 22)以及从未经历过DV的参与者(NDV组;n = 21)展示屏幕,屏幕上呈现情绪面孔(愤怒、恐惧和高兴)与中性面孔配对,以及负面面孔(愤怒和恐惧)与高兴面孔配对,持续10秒。结果表明,与DV-低PTSS组和NDV组相比,DV-高PTSS组随着时间的推移在愤怒面孔上停留的时间更长。这一结果意味着DV-高PTSS组专注于特定的创伤相关刺激,但总体上并未提供对威胁性刺激存在注意偏向的证据。

相似文献

1
Attentional bias towards emotional facial expressions in survivors of dating violence.约会暴力幸存者对情绪化面部表情的注意偏向。
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(6):1127-36. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.867834. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
2
Attentional bias to violent images in survivors of dating violence.恋爱暴力幸存者对暴力图像的注意偏向。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(6):1124-33. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.638906. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
3
Effects of long-term meditation practice on attentional biases towards emotional faces: An eye-tracking study.长期冥想练习对情绪面孔注意偏向的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(5):807-15. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.945903. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
4
Double attention bias for positive and negative emotional faces in clinical depression: evidence from an eye-tracking study.临床抑郁症中对积极和消极情绪面孔的双重注意偏向:一项眼动追踪研究的证据。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;46:107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
5
Attentional bias and its temporal dynamics among war veterans suffering from chronic pain: Investigating the contribution of post-traumatic stress symptoms.慢性疼痛的退伍军人的注意偏向及其时间动态:探究创伤后应激症状的贡献。
J Anxiety Disord. 2019 Aug;66:102115. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.102115. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
6
The time-course of attention to emotional faces in social phobia.社交恐惧症患者对情绪面孔的注意时程。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;41(1):39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.08.008. Epub 2009 Sep 6.
7
Orienting and maintenance of attention to threatening facial expressions in anxiety--an eye movement study.焦虑中对威胁性面部表情的定向和维持注意力——一项眼动研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 15;220(1-2):362-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
8
Early detection and avoidance of threatening faces during passive viewing.在被动观看过程中对威胁性面孔的早期检测与回避。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jul;62(7):1257-64. doi: 10.1080/17470210902725753. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
9
Difficulty in disengaging attention from threatening facial expressions in anxiety: a new approach in terms of benefits.焦虑中难以从威胁性面部表情中转移注意力:从收益角度的新方法。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;45(1):203-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
10
Dwelling on potential threat cues: an eye movement marker for combat-related PTSD.关注潜在威胁线索:与战斗相关 PTSD 的眼动标记物。
Depress Anxiety. 2013 May;30(5):497-502. doi: 10.1002/da.22115.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of intimate partner violence on facial emotion recognition among Korean baby boomers.亲密伴侣暴力对韩国婴儿潮一代面部表情识别的影响。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2474890. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2474890. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
Examining attentional avoidance in post-traumatic stress disorder: an exploratory 'Face in the Crowd' paradigm using eye-tracking.创伤后应激障碍中注意力回避的研究:一项使用眼动追踪技术的探索性“人群中的面孔”范式
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2462489. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2462489. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
3
Eye-tracking indices of attention allocation and attention bias variability are differently related to trauma exposure and PTSD.
眼动追踪指标中的注意力分配和注意力偏差可变性与创伤暴露和 PTSD 有不同的关系。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 May;96:102715. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102715. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
4
AI-Based Prediction and Prevention of Psychological and Behavioral Changes in Ex-COVID-19 Patients.基于人工智能的新冠康复患者心理和行为变化预测与预防
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 28;12:782866. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.782866. eCollection 2021.
5
Attention allocation in posttraumatic stress disorder: an eye-tracking study.创伤后应激障碍中的注意力分配:一项眼动追踪研究。
Psychol Med. 2021 Feb 26:1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000581.
6
Attention to threat in posttraumatic stress disorder as indexed by eye-tracking indices: a systematic review.创伤后应激障碍的眼动追踪指标对威胁的注意:系统评价。
Psychol Med. 2019 Apr;49(5):705-726. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002313. Epub 2018 Sep 4.