a Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health , Heidelberg , Victoria , Australia.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(2):132-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.800637.
There is some suggestion in the literature that professional drivers might self-select to be more resistant to the effects of sleep deprivation; however, this question has not been directly examined. The current laboratory study aimed to compare performance changes during acute sleep deprivation between professional and nonprofessional drivers.
Twenty volunteer male professional drivers and 20 nonprofessional drivers performed a simulated driving task (AusEd) and the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) during 24 hours of continuous wakefulness. Ratings of subjective sleepiness were also examined.
There was a progressive and significant increase in lateral lane position and speed variability on the simulated driving task and an increase in PVT reaction times and lapses after participants had been awake for 17 to 24 hours (Ps < .01). There was no difference in performance changes between the professional and nonprofessional drivers.
Professional drivers in this study had the same susceptibility to sleep deprivation as nonprofessional drivers. This finding does not support the concept that professional drivers are resistant to sleep loss.
文献中有一些提示表明,专业驾驶员可能会自我选择更能抵抗睡眠剥夺的影响;然而,这个问题尚未被直接研究。本实验室研究旨在比较职业驾驶员和非职业驾驶员在急性睡眠剥夺期间的表现变化。
20 名志愿男性职业驾驶员和 20 名非职业驾驶员在 24 小时连续清醒期间进行了模拟驾驶任务(AusEd)和精神运动警觉任务(PVT)。还检查了主观困倦的评分。
在模拟驾驶任务中,侧向车道位置和速度变异性逐渐显著增加,并且在参与者清醒 17 至 24 小时后,PVT 反应时间和失误增加(P <.01)。职业驾驶员和非职业驾驶员的表现变化没有差异。
本研究中的职业驾驶员与非职业驾驶员一样容易受到睡眠剥夺的影响。这一发现不支持职业驾驶员对睡眠不足有抵抗力的观点。