Kenny T J, Hebel J R, Sexton M J, Fox N L
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1987 Feb;8(1):8-11.
The need for comprehensive screening of pediatric populations to identify potential development problems is widely accepted. The lack of systematic screening in pediatric practice is due to several factors, including the need for an efficient, reliable instrument and the limited professional time available for screening. The present study compares the effectiveness of a screening instrument, the Minnesota Child Development Inventory, with an individually administered psychological test, the McCarthy Scales of Child Development. Because the former uses a parent report format, little professional time is involved in screening. The Minnesota and McCarthy were administered to 364 children who were within 1 month of their third birthday. Four of five Minnesota scores correlated significantly (p less than 0.0001) with each of the six McCarthy subscores. The Minnesota appears to be an efficient, valid test that would facilitate comprehensive screening in a pediatric population.
对儿科人群进行全面筛查以识别潜在发育问题的必要性已得到广泛认可。儿科实践中缺乏系统筛查是由多种因素造成的,包括需要一种高效、可靠的工具以及可用于筛查的专业时间有限。本研究比较了一种筛查工具明尼苏达儿童发展量表与单独进行的心理测试麦卡锡儿童发展量表的有效性。由于前者采用家长报告形式,筛查过程中涉及的专业时间很少。对364名年龄在三岁生日前1个月内的儿童进行了明尼苏达量表和麦卡锡量表测试。明尼苏达量表的五个分数中有四个与麦卡锡量表的六个子分数中的每一个都有显著相关性(p小于0.0001)。明尼苏达量表似乎是一种高效、有效的测试工具,有助于对儿科人群进行全面筛查。