Suppr超能文献

三氧化矿物凝聚体与玻璃离子水门汀根管封闭能力的比较评价:一项体外研究。

Comparative evaluation of intracanal sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study.

作者信息

Malik Gauri, Bogra Poonam, Singh Simranjeet, Samra Rupandeep K

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Gian Sagar Dental College and Research Center, Banur, Punjab, India.

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, D.A.V(C), College, Yamuna Nagar, Haryana, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2013 Nov;16(6):540-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.120961.

Abstract

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) and Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) when used over gutta-percha as intracanal sealing materials. The study also evaluated the sealing ability of Zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) cement and Acroseal sealer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Teeth were obturated with gutta-percha using sealer ZOE (group A, C, D) and Acroseal (group B). The groups were further divided into 2 subgroups (15 premolars each) on the basis of intracanal sealing material used: GIC subgroups (A1, B1) and MTA in subgroups (A2, B2). The clearing technique was used in this study for leakage evaluation. Seventy mandibular premolars were prepared using step-back technique and divided into experimental groups A and B (30 premolars each) and the positive and negative control groups C and D (5 premolars each).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Coronal microleakage was determined under stereomicroscope using 15X magnification. Data was statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Post-Hoc Multiple comparison (Bonferroni).

RESULTS

MTA group leaked significantly less than GIC group (P < 0.05). Acroseal exhibited better sealing ability than ZOE sealer. Teeth with no intracanal barrier showed almost complete leakage.

CONCLUSIONS

MTA may be preferred over GIC as an intracanal barrier.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较矿物三氧化物凝聚体(MTA)和玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)作为根管内封闭材料覆盖牙胶时的封闭能力。该研究还评估了氧化锌丁香酚(ZOE)水门汀和Acroseal封闭剂的封闭能力。

材料与方法

使用ZOE封闭剂(A组、C组、D组)和Acroseal封闭剂(B组)用牙胶对牙齿进行根管充填。根据所使用的根管内封闭材料,将这些组进一步分为2个亚组(每组15颗前磨牙):GIC亚组(A1、B1)和MTA亚组(A2、B2)。本研究采用透明技术评估渗漏情况。使用逐步后退技术制备70颗下颌前磨牙,并分为实验组A和B(每组30颗前磨牙)以及阳性和阴性对照组C和D(每组5颗前磨牙)。

所用统计分析方法

在体视显微镜下以15倍放大率测定冠部微渗漏。数据采用单因素方差分析,随后进行事后多重比较(Bonferroni法)进行统计学分析。

结果

MTA组的渗漏明显少于GIC组(P < 0.05)。Acroseal的封闭能力优于ZOE封闭剂。没有根管屏障的牙齿几乎完全渗漏。

结论

作为根管屏障,MTA可能比GIC更受青睐。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcf5/3842724/4cef069066ae/JCD-16-540-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验