Roberts Howard W, Toth Jeffrey M, Berzins David W, Charlton David G
USAF Dental Evaluation and Consultation Service, Dental Biomaterials Evaluation, Great Lakes, IL, United States.
Dent Mater. 2008 Feb;24(2):149-64. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
The purpose of this paper was to review the composition, properties, biocompatibility, and the clinical results involving the use of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) materials in endodontic treatment.
Electronic search of scientific papers from January 1990 to August 2006 was accomplished using PubMed and Scopus search engines (search terms: MTA, GMTA, WMTA, mineral AND trioxide AND aggregate).
Selected exclusion criteria resulted in 156 citations from the scientific, peer-reviewed dental literature. MTA materials are derived from a Portland cement parent compound and have been demonstrated to be biocompatible endodontic repair materials, with its biocompatible nature strongly suggested by its ability to form hydroxyappatite when exposed to physiologic solutions. With some exceptions, MTA materials provide better microleakage protection than traditional endodontic repair materials using dye, fluid filtration, and bacterial penetration leakage models. In both animal and human studies, MTA materials have been shown to have excellent potential as pulp-capping and pulpotomy medicaments but studies with long-term follow-up are limited. Preliminary studies suggested a favorable MTA material use as apical and furcation restorative materials as well as medicaments for apexogenesis and apexification treatments; however, long-term clinical studies are needed in these areas.
MTA materials have been shown to have a biocompatible nature and have excellent potential in endodontic use. MTA materials are a refined Portland cement material and the substitution of Portland cement for MTA products is presently discouraged. Existing human studies involving MTA materials are very promising, however, insufficient randomized, double-blind clinical studies of sufficient duration exist involving MTA for all of its clinical indications. Further clinical studies are needed in these areas.
本文旨在综述矿物三氧化物凝聚体(MTA)材料在牙髓治疗中的成分、性能、生物相容性及临床效果。
利用PubMed和Scopus搜索引擎对1990年1月至2006年8月的科学论文进行电子检索(检索词:MTA、GMTA、WMTA、矿物、三氧化物、凝聚体)。
选定的排除标准导致从经过同行评审的牙科科学文献中筛选出156篇引用文献。MTA材料源自波特兰水泥母体化合物,已被证明是生物相容性良好的牙髓修复材料,当暴露于生理溶液时能够形成羟基磷灰石,这有力地表明了其生物相容性。除了一些例外情况,使用染料、流体过滤和细菌渗透泄漏模型研究表明,MTA材料比传统的牙髓修复材料能提供更好的微渗漏保护。在动物和人体研究中,MTA材料已显示出作为盖髓剂和活髓切断术药物具有极好的潜力,但长期随访研究有限。初步研究表明,MTA材料作为根尖和根分叉修复材料以及用于牙根形成和根尖诱导成形治疗的药物具有良好前景;然而,这些领域需要长期临床研究。
MTA材料已被证明具有生物相容性,在牙髓治疗中具有极好的潜力。MTA材料是一种精制的波特兰水泥材料,目前不鼓励用波特兰水泥替代MTA产品。现有的涉及MTA材料的人体研究很有前景,然而,对于MTA所有临床适应症,缺乏足够数量的、持续时间足够长的随机双盲临床研究。这些领域需要进一步的临床研究。