Ismail Sharif A, Gibbons Daniel C, Gnani Shamini
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London.
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Dec;63(617):e813-20. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X675395.
Inappropriate attendances may account for up to 40% of presentations at accident and emergency (A&E) departments. There is considerable interest from health practitioners and policymakers in interventions to reduce this burden.
To review the evidence on primary care service interventions to reduce inappropriate A&E attendances.
Systematic review of UK and international primary care interventions.
Studies published in English between 1 January 1986 and 23 August 2011 were identified from PubMed, the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, the Cochrane Collaboration, and Health Technology Assessment databases. The outcome measures were A&E attendances, patient satisfaction, clinical outcome, and intervention cost. Two authors reviewed titles and abstracts of retrieved results, with adjudication of disagreements conducted by the third. Studies were quality assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklist system where applicable.
In total, 9916 manuscripts were identified, of which 34 were reviewed. Telephone triage was the single best-evaluated intervention. This resulted in negligible impact on A&E attendance, but exhibited acceptable patient satisfaction and clinical safety; cost effectiveness was uncertain. The limited available evidence suggests that emergency nurse practitioners in community settings and community health centres may reduce A&E attendance. For all other interventions considered in this review (walk-in centres, minor injuries units, and out-of-hours general practice), the effects on A&E attendance, patient outcomes, and cost were inconclusive.
Studies showed a negligible effect on A&E attendance for all interventions; data on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness are limited. There is an urgent need to examine all aspects of primary care service interventions that aim to reduce inappropriate A&E attendance.
在事故与急救(A&E)部门的就诊中,不适当就诊情况可能占高达40%。医疗从业者和政策制定者对减轻这一负担的干预措施极为关注。
综述关于基层医疗服务干预措施以减少不适当的A&E就诊情况的证据。
对英国及国际基层医疗干预措施进行系统综述。
从PubMed、英国国家医疗服务体系经济评估数据库、Cochrane协作网以及卫生技术评估数据库中,识别出1986年1月1日至2011年8月23日期间以英文发表的研究。结果指标为A&E就诊次数、患者满意度、临床结局及干预成本。两位作者审查检索结果的标题和摘要,分歧由第三位作者裁决。适用时,使用苏格兰校际指南网络清单系统对研究进行质量评估。
共识别出9916篇手稿,其中34篇进行了综述。电话分诊是唯一经过充分评估的干预措施。这对A&E就诊次数的影响微乎其微,但患者满意度和临床安全性尚可;成本效益尚不确定。有限的现有证据表明,社区环境中的急诊护士从业者和社区健康中心可能会减少A&E就诊次数。对于本综述中考虑的所有其他干预措施(即无需预约的医疗中心、轻伤诊治单位和非工作时间的全科医疗服务),对A&E就诊次数、患者结局和成本的影响尚无定论。
研究表明,所有干预措施对A&E就诊次数的影响均微乎其微;关于患者结局和成本效益的数据有限。迫切需要审视旨在减少不适当A&E就诊情况的基层医疗服务干预措施的各个方面。