DeLany J P, Jakicic J M, Lowery J B, Hames K C, Kelley D E, Goodpaster B H
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Health and Physical Activity, Physical Activity and Weight Management Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Sep;38(9):1147-52. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.240. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
African American (AA) women have been shown to lose less weight than Caucasian women in response to behavioral interventions. Our objective was to examine adherence to intervention and metabolic factors that may explain this difference.
We examined longitudinal changes in body weight and energy expenditure (EE), and objective assessment of physical activity (PA) and energy intake (EI) during 6 months of a weight-loss intervention program, including prescribed calorie restriction and increased PA in 66 Caucasian and 39 AA severely obese women. Comparisons were also made in 25 Caucasian and 25 AA women matched for initial body weight.
The AA women lost 3.6 kg less weight than Caucasian women. Total daily EE (TDEE) and resting metabolic rate (RMR) adjusted for fat free mass (FFM) were significantly lower in the AA women, whereas the decrease in RMR in response to weight loss was greater in Caucasian women. Adherence to the prescribed PA and change in PA in response to intervention were similar in AA and Caucasian women. Prescribed EI (1794±153 and 1806±153 kcal per day) and measured EI during intervention (2591±371 vs 2630±442 kcal per day) were nearly identical in matched AA and Caucasian women. However, the AA women lost significantly less body weight due to lower energy requirements (2924±279 vs 3116±340 kcal per day; P<0.04), resulting in a lower energy deficit (333±210 vs 485±264 kcal per day).
Adherence to the behavioral intervention was similar in AA and Caucasian women. However, neglecting to account for the lower energy requirements in AA women when calculating the energy prescription resulted in a lower level of calorie restriction and, hence, less body weight loss. Therefore, to achieve similar weight loss in AA women, the prescribed caloric restriction cannot be based on weight alone, but must be lower than in Caucasians, to account for lower energy requirements.
研究表明,在行为干预下,非裔美国(AA)女性比白人女性减重更少。我们的目标是研究可能解释这种差异的干预依从性和代谢因素。
我们在一项为期6个月的减肥干预项目中,研究了66名白人及39名AA重度肥胖女性体重和能量消耗(EE)的纵向变化,以及对身体活动(PA)和能量摄入(EI)的客观评估,该项目包括规定的热量限制和增加PA。还对25名体重初始值匹配的白人女性和25名AA女性进行了比较。
AA女性比白人女性少减重3.6千克。调整无脂肪体重(FFM)后的每日总EE(TDEE)和静息代谢率(RMR)在AA女性中显著更低,而白人女性因体重减轻导致的RMR下降幅度更大。AA女性和白人女性对规定PA的依从性以及干预后PA的变化相似。匹配的AA女性和白人女性规定的EI(每天1794±153和1806±153千卡)以及干预期间测量的EI(每天2591±371对2630±442千卡)几乎相同。然而,由于能量需求较低(每天2924±279对3116±340千卡;P<0.04),AA女性体重减轻明显更少,导致能量缺口更低(每天333±210对485±264千卡)。
AA女性和白人女性对行为干预的依从性相似。然而,在计算能量处方时忽略AA女性较低的能量需求,导致热量限制水平较低,因此体重减轻较少。所以,要使AA女性实现相似的体重减轻,规定的热量限制不能仅基于体重,而必须低于白人女性,以考虑较低的能量需求。