Suppr超能文献

相似文献

4
Nonfunctional distractor analysis: An indicator for quality of Multiple choice questions.
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Jul-Aug;36(5):982-986. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.5.2439.
5
Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions' item writing flaws.
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1812224. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1812224.
7
The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2006 Dec;6(6):354-63. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2006.07.002. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
8
Do item-writing flaws reduce examinations psychometric quality?
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Aug 11;9(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2202-4.
9
The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.
Nurse Educ Today. 2006 Dec;26(8):662-71. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.006. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
10
Multiple choice questions. The debate goes on.
Br J Med Educ. 1975 Dec;9(4):275-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1975.tb01938.x.

引用本文的文献

3
Dissecting knowledge, guessing, and blunder in multiple choice assessments.
Appl Meas Educ. 2023;36(1):80-98. doi: 10.1080/08957347.2023.2172017. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
4
Improving Summative Assessment Through a Resource-Efficient Faculty Review Process.
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Sep 13;32(5):979-983. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01631-9. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
6
Psychometric analysis of Anatomy MCQs in Modular examination.
Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Sep-Oct;33(5):1138-1143. doi: 10.12669/pjms.335.12382.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验