Smart Water Research Centre, Griffith University Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia.
Water Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Water Res. 2014 Feb 1;49:300-15. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.030. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
The growing use of recycled water in large urban centres requires comprehensive public health risk assessment and management, an important aspect of which is the assessment and management of residual trace chemical substances. Bioanalytical methods such as in vitro bioassays may be ideal screening tools that can detect a wide range of contaminants based on their biological effect. In this study, we applied thirteen in vitro assays selected explicitly for their ability to detect molecular and cellular effects relevant to potential chemical exposure via drinking water as a means of screening for chemical contaminants from recycled water at 9 Australian water reclamation plants, in parallel to more targeted direct chemical analysis of 39 priority compounds. The selected assays provided measures of primary non-specific (cytotoxicity to various cell types), specific (inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and endocrine receptor-mediated effects) and reactive toxicity (mutagenicity and genotoxicity), as well as markers of adaptive stress response (modulation of cytokine production) and xenobiotic metabolism (liver enzyme induction). Chemical and bioassay analyses were in agreement and complementary to each other: the results show that source water (treated wastewater) contained high levels of biologically active compounds, with positive results in almost all bioassays. The quality of the product water (reclaimed water) was only marginally better after ultrafiltration or dissolved air floatation/filtration, but greatly improved after reverse osmosis often reducing biological activity to below detection limit. The bioassays were able to detect activity at concentrations below current chemical method detection limits and provided a sum measure of all biologically active compounds for that bioassay, thus providing an additional degree of confidence in water quality.
在大型城市中心越来越多地使用再生水,需要进行全面的公共卫生风险评估和管理,其中一个重要方面是评估和管理残留痕量化学物质。生物分析方法,如体外生物测定,可能是理想的筛选工具,可以根据其生物效应检测广泛的污染物。在这项研究中,我们应用了 13 种体外测定法,这些方法专门用于检测与通过饮用水潜在化学暴露相关的分子和细胞效应,作为筛选来自澳大利亚 9 个水再生厂的再生水中化学污染物的手段,同时对 39 种优先化合物进行更有针对性的直接化学分析。选定的测定法提供了初级非特异性(对各种细胞类型的细胞毒性)、特异性(乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制和内分泌受体介导的效应)和反应性毒性(致突变性和遗传毒性)以及适应性应激反应标志物(细胞因子产生的调节)和外来生物代谢(肝酶诱导)的测量。化学和生物测定分析是一致和互补的:结果表明,原水(处理后的废水)含有高水平的具有生物活性的化合物,几乎所有的生物测定都呈阳性。超滤或溶气浮选/过滤后的产品水(再生水)质量仅略有改善,但反渗透后水质大大改善,生物活性通常降低到检测限以下。生物测定能够检测到低于当前化学方法检测限的活性,并为该生物测定提供所有具有生物活性的化合物的总和测量值,从而为水质提供了额外的可信度。