• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Stakeholder perceptions of thoracic rapid tissue donation: An exploratory study.利益相关者对胸部快速组织捐赠的看法:一项探索性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Dec;99:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.035. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
2
Patient, caregiver and physician perspectives on participating in a thoracic rapid tissue donation program.患者、护理人员和医生对参与胸部快速组织捐赠计划的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Apr;101(4):703-710. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
3
Healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes about rapid tissue donation (RTD): phase one of establishing a rapid tissue donation programme in thoracic oncology.医疗机构关于快速组织捐献(RTD)的知识和态度:在胸肿瘤学中建立快速组织捐献项目的第一阶段。
J Med Ethics. 2014 Feb;40(2):139-42. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101340. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
4
A survey of health care professionals and oncology patients at the McGill University Health Centre reveals enthusiasm for establishing a postmortem rapid tissue donation program.麦吉尔大学健康中心的一项针对医疗保健专业人员和肿瘤患者的调查显示,他们对建立死后快速组织捐赠计划充满热情。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Aug;26(4):e558-e570. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4771. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
5
Altruism in terminal cancer patients and rapid tissue donation program: does the theory apply?晚期癌症患者的利他行为与快速组织捐赠计划:该理论适用吗?
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Nov;16(4):857-64. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9480-6.
6
Stakeholders' Perceptions and Information Needs Regarding Research Medical Donation.利益相关者对研究用医疗捐赠的认知和信息需求。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Nov;58(5):792-804.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
Development of a Canadian deceased donation education program for health professionals: a needs assessment survey.开发加拿大针对卫生专业人员的器官捐献教育计划:需求评估调查。
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Oct;64(10):1037-1047. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0882-4. Epub 2017 May 3.
8
Communicative challenges among physicians, patients, and family caregivers in cancer care: An exploratory qualitative study in Ethiopia.癌症护理中医生、患者和家庭照顾者之间的沟通挑战:在埃塞俄比亚进行的探索性定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 13;15(3):e0230309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230309. eCollection 2020.
9
A community-based lung cancer rapid tissue donation protocol provides high-quality drug-resistant specimens for proteogenomic analyses.基于社区的肺癌快速组织捐赠方案为药物抗性的蛋白质基因组分析提供了高质量的标本。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jan;9(1):225-237. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2670. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
10
Recruiting terminally ill patients into non-therapeutic oncology studies: views of health professionals.招募绝症患者参加非治疗性肿瘤学研究:卫生专业人员的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2012 Dec 5;13:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-33.

引用本文的文献

1
Elective intensive care unit admissions for organ donation in patients with terminal brain glioma: Case report.终末期脑胶质瘤患者器官捐献的择期重症监护病房收治:病例报告
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2024 Mar 4;12:2050313X241235009. doi: 10.1177/2050313X241235009. eCollection 2024.
2
Post-mortem tissue donation programs as platforms to accelerate cancer research.尸检组织捐赠项目作为加速癌症研究的平台。
J Pathol Clin Res. 2020 Jul;6(3):163-170. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.159. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
3
A survey of health care professionals and oncology patients at the McGill University Health Centre reveals enthusiasm for establishing a postmortem rapid tissue donation program.麦吉尔大学健康中心的一项针对医疗保健专业人员和肿瘤患者的调查显示,他们对建立死后快速组织捐赠计划充满热情。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Aug;26(4):e558-e570. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4771. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
4
Stakeholders' Perceptions and Information Needs Regarding Research Medical Donation.利益相关者对研究用医疗捐赠的认知和信息需求。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Nov;58(5):792-804.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
5
The sociology of cancer: a decade of research.癌症社会学:十年研究
Sociol Health Illn. 2018 Mar;40(3):552-576. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12662. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
6
Patient, caregiver and physician perspectives on participating in a thoracic rapid tissue donation program.患者、护理人员和医生对参与胸部快速组织捐赠计划的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Apr;101(4):703-710. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
Altruism in terminal cancer patients and rapid tissue donation program: does the theory apply?晚期癌症患者的利他行为与快速组织捐赠计划:该理论适用吗?
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Nov;16(4):857-64. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9480-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges in end-of-life communication.临终关怀沟通的挑战。
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2012 Sep;6(3):355-64. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e328356ab72.
2
To make the unusual usual: is there an imperative to discuss organ donation with palliative care patients?化非常规为常规:是否有必要与姑息治疗患者讨论器官捐赠?
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2012 Jan;18(1):5-7. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2012.18.1.5.
3
Maintaining integrity in the face of death: a grounded theory to explain the perspectives of people affected by lung cancer about the expression of wishes for end of life care.面对死亡时保持完整:一个扎根理论,用以解释肺癌患者对生命终末期护理意愿表达的观点。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jun;49(6):718-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.12.003. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
4
Family, friends, and faith: how organ donor families heal.家人、朋友与信念:器官捐赠者的家属如何走出伤痛
Prog Transplant. 2009 Dec;19(4):358-61. doi: 10.1177/152692480901900412.
5
Understanding the antecedents of the acceptance of donation after cardiac death by healthcare professionals.了解医护人员对心脏死亡后器官捐赠接受情况的影响因素。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):1075-81. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181691b2b.
6
Exploring the psychological effects of deceased organ donation on the families of the organ donors.探讨 deceased 器官捐赠对器官捐赠者家属的心理影响。 (注:这里“deceased”常见释义为“已故的” ,但在器官捐赠语境下不太准确,可能原文有误,正常应该是“cadaveric”即“尸体的、捐赠器官的尸体的” ,不过按照给定原文翻译如上 )
Clin Transplant. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):341-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2008.00790.x. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
7
Palliative care consultation in the process of organ donation after cardiac death.心源性死亡后器官捐献过程中的姑息治疗会诊。
J Palliat Med. 2007 Feb;10(1):118-26. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.0118.
8
Using telephone focus groups methodology to examine the prostate cancer screening practices of African-American primary care physicians.采用电话焦点小组方法研究非裔美国初级保健医生的前列腺癌筛查实践。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Aug;98(8):1296-9.
9
Lessons from our patients: development of a warm autopsy program.我们患者的经验教训:温暖尸检项目的开展
PLoS Med. 2006 Jul;3(7):e234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030234.
10
Attitudes toward death criteria and organ donation among healthcare personnel and the general public.医护人员和普通公众对死亡标准及器官捐赠的态度。
Prog Transplant. 2006 Mar;16(1):65-73. doi: 10.1177/152692480601600113.

利益相关者对胸部快速组织捐赠的看法:一项探索性研究。

Stakeholder perceptions of thoracic rapid tissue donation: An exploratory study.

机构信息

Cancer Prevention and Control, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.

Thoracic Oncology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2013 Dec;99:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.035. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.035
PMID:24355468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3869974/
Abstract

Rapid autopsy or rapid tissue donation (RTD) is a novel method of tissue procurement in which 'fresh' tissue is collected within 2-6 h following the death of a patient. While the use of RTD offers many opportunities to develop new therapies for lung cancer patients, it raises ethical concerns. The purpose of this study was to examine knowledge, perceptions and ethical concerns about recruiting patients for an RTD program. To achieve research goals, we conducted six focus groups, each containing 5-10 participants (N = 38). Participants were cancer patients (n = 17) their caregivers (n = 6), physicians (n = 6) and clinic staff (n = 9) from the Thoracic Oncology Program at Moffitt Cancer Center, in Tampa, Florida, USA. All focus groups were audio-recorded and conducted using a semi-structured focus group guide. The transcripts were analyzed using hand-coding methods. Data were coded independently by at least two researchers, and an inter-rater reliability rate of ≥90% was achieved. Knowledge about RTD was low among all groups, with physicians having slightly higher knowledge; all groups agreed that RTD offered major benefits to cancer research; physicians and clinic staff were mainly concerned about making a patient feel uncomfortable and reducing hope, while, patients and family members were more concerned about logistics and how the family would be affected during tissue retrieval. All groups agreed the physician was the appropriate person to begin a discussion about RTD and that recruitment should be individualized. All groups reported that physician training is necessary, as well as an awareness campaign for patients and families to be more receptive about RTD. The results of this study suggested more education is needed for all stakeholders to learn about RTD prior to the initiation of a research program. Our approach of querying all stakeholders provides a firm foundation for future training modules regarding RTD programs in lung cancer.

摘要

快速尸检或快速组织捐献(RTD)是一种新型的组织采集方法,在患者死亡后 2-6 小时内采集“新鲜”组织。虽然 RTD 的使用为开发肺癌患者的新疗法提供了许多机会,但它也引发了伦理问题。本研究旨在探讨招募患者参与 RTD 计划的知识、看法和伦理问题。为了实现研究目标,我们进行了六次焦点小组讨论,每次讨论包含 5-10 名参与者(N=38)。参与者包括佛罗里达州坦帕市莫菲特癌症中心胸肿瘤计划的癌症患者(n=17)及其护理人员(n=6)、医生(n=6)和诊所工作人员(n=9)。所有焦点小组都进行了录音,并使用半结构化焦点小组指南进行了讨论。使用手工编码方法对转录本进行分析。数据由至少两名研究人员独立编码,并且达到了 90%以上的组内可靠性。所有组对 RTD 的了解都很低,医生的了解略高;所有组都认为 RTD 为癌症研究带来了重大好处;医生和诊所工作人员主要担心让患者感到不适并降低希望,而患者和家属则更关心后勤问题以及在组织采集过程中家庭会受到什么影响。所有组都同意医生是开始讨论 RTD 的合适人选,并且招募应该是个体化的。所有组都报告说,需要对医生进行培训,并且需要开展患者和家属的宣传活动,使他们对 RTD 更能接受。这项研究的结果表明,在启动研究计划之前,所有利益相关者都需要更多的教育来了解 RTD。我们向所有利益相关者询问的方法为未来有关肺癌 RTD 计划的培训模块提供了坚实的基础。