Suppr超能文献

使用 FOCUS 直接检测盘检测临床标本中流感病毒和呼吸道合胞病毒,无需核酸提取,其结果与传统方法和 FOCUS 核酸依赖型 RT-PCR 检测法基本相当。

Influenza and respiratory syncytial virus detection in clinical specimens without nucleic acid extraction using FOCUS direct disc assay is substantially equivalent to the traditional methods and the FOCUS nucleic acid extraction-dependent RT-PCR assay.

机构信息

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.

Focus Diagnostics, Inc., Cypress, CA, USA.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Mar;78(3):232-6. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.11.016. Epub 2013 Nov 27.

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated FOCUS diagnostic's Flu A/B & RSV direct kit (Direct Disc assay), designed to detect influenza (FLU) and respiratory syncytial viruses (RSV) directly in clinical specimens without nucleic acid extraction. This novel 'sample-to-answer', nucleic acid extraction-independent assay uses a unique disc to process, amplify, and detect viral targets in up to 8 specimens at a time. The performance of this assay for detecting FLU and RSV viruses was compared to the traditional methods (culture and/or direct florescent antibody testing) using 945 nasopharyngeal swab specimens. In addition, a total of 150 consecutive clinical specimens positive for FLU (FLU A=50, FLU B=50) or RSV (n=50) were tested in parallel using the novel Direct Disc assay and FOCUS diagnostic's nucleic acid extraction-dependent assay to assess their relative performance. Compared to the traditional methods, the overall (prospective+retrospective) positive/negative percent agreement was determined to be 96.6%/98.1% for FLU A, 98.4%/99.9% for FLU B, and 99.3%/98.8% for RSV. Compared to the nucleic acid extraction-dependent assay, the positive percent agreement was 90% (n=45/50) for FLU A, 92% (n=46/50) for FLU B, and 98% (n=49/50) for RSV. Overall, the Direct Disc assay showed good agreement with both traditional methods and nucleic acid extraction-dependent assay. Although we encountered some failures compared to the nucleic acid extraction-dependent assay, these limitations must be balanced against the substantial advantages of the extraction-free nature of this assay and rapid turnaround time.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们评估了 FOCUS diagnostic 的 Flu A/B & RSV direct 试剂盒(直接检测盘),该试剂盒旨在直接从临床标本中检测流感(FLU)和呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV),无需核酸提取。这种新颖的“样本到答案”、无需核酸提取的检测方法使用独特的圆盘同时处理、扩增和检测多达 8 个标本中的病毒靶标。使用 945 个鼻咽拭子标本,将该检测方法与传统方法(培养和/或直接荧光抗体检测)比较,检测 FLU 和 RSV 病毒的性能。此外,使用新型的直接检测盘和 FOCUS diagnostic 的核酸提取依赖型检测方法,对总共 150 份连续的临床标本(FLU 阳性[FLU A=50,FLU B=50]或 RSV 阳性[n=50])进行平行检测,以评估它们的相对性能。与传统方法相比,FLU A 的总体(前瞻性+回顾性)阳性/阴性符合率为 96.6%/98.1%,FLU B 为 98.4%/99.9%,RSV 为 99.3%/98.8%。与核酸提取依赖型检测方法相比,FLU A 的阳性符合率为 90%(n=45/50),FLU B 为 92%(n=46/50),RSV 为 98%(n=49/50)。总体而言,直接检测盘与传统方法和核酸提取依赖型检测方法均具有良好的一致性。尽管与核酸提取依赖型检测方法相比,我们遇到了一些失败,但必须权衡该检测方法无需提取以及快速周转时间的显著优势和这些限制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验