Suppr超能文献

Luminex ARIES Flu A/B & RSV 和 Cepheid Xpert Flu/RSV XC 在前瞻性患者样本中检测甲型流感、乙型流感和呼吸道合胞病毒的性能。

The performance of Luminex ARIES Flu A/B & RSV and Cepheid Xpert Flu/RSV XC for the detection of influenza A, influenza B, and respiratory syncytial virus in prospective patient samples.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2017 Oct;95:84-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Sep 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The demand for rapid, accurate viral testing has increased the number of assays available for the detection of viral pathogens. One of the newest FDA cleared platforms is the Luminex ARIES Flu A/B & RSV, which is a fully automated, real-time PCR-based assay used for detection of influenza A, influenza B, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the performance of Luminex ARIES Flu A/B & RSV assay to the Cepheid Xpert Flu/RSV XC assay for rapid Flu and RSV testing.

STUDY DESIGN

A series of consecutive nasopharyngeal specimens received in the clinical microbiology laboratory during peak influenza season at a major academic center in Chicago, IL, were prospectively tested, using both the ARIES Flu A/B & RSV and Xpert Flu/RSV XC assays, side by side. Discrepant results were tested on the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel for resolution.

RESULTS

A total of 143 consecutive nasopharyngeal specimens, obtained from patients ranging from six months to ninety-three years in age were received between January 1st, 2017 and March 21st, 2017. There was 96.6% agreement between the two assays for detection influenza A, 100% agreement for detection influenza B and RSV, and 98.9% agreement for negative results. The Xpert Flu/RSV XC performed with an average turn-around time of approximately 60min, compared to the ARIES Flu A/B & RSV of approximately 120min. Both assays were equally easy to perform, with a similar amount of hands-on technologist time for each platform.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, these results indicate that both tests are comparable in terms of result agreement and technical ease-of-use. The Xpert Flu/RSV XC assay did produce results with less turn-around-time, approximately 60min quicker than the ARIES Flu A/B & RSV.

摘要

背景

对快速、准确的病毒检测的需求增加了可用于检测病毒病原体的检测方法的数量。最新获得美国食品和药物管理局批准的平台之一是 Luminex ARIES Flu A/B & RSV,这是一种全自动、基于实时 PCR 的检测方法,用于检测流感 A、流感 B 和呼吸道合胞病毒 (RSV)。

目的

我们旨在比较 Luminex ARIES Flu A/B & RSV 检测法与 Cepheid Xpert Flu/RSV XC 检测法在快速流感和 RSV 检测方面的性能。

研究设计

在伊利诺伊州芝加哥的一家主要学术中心,在流感季节高峰期,连续对临床微生物学实验室收到的一系列鼻咽标本进行前瞻性检测,同时使用 ARIES Flu A/B & RSV 和 Xpert Flu/RSV XC 检测法。对出现差异的结果进行 BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel 检测以解决问题。

结果

共收到 143 例连续的鼻咽标本,患者年龄从六个月到九十三岁不等,这些标本于 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 3 月 21 日期间获得。两种检测方法在检测流感 A 方面的一致性为 96.6%,在检测流感 B 和 RSV 方面的一致性为 100%,阴性结果的一致性为 98.9%。Xpert Flu/RSV XC 的平均周转时间约为 60min,而 ARIES Flu A/B & RSV 的平均周转时间约为 120min。两种检测方法都易于操作,每个平台所需的技术人员上手时间相似。

结论

总的来说,这些结果表明,两种检测方法在结果一致性和技术易用性方面相当。Xpert Flu/RSV XC 检测法的周转时间较短,比 ARIES Flu A/B & RSV 快约 60min。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验