• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对声誉特质信息的记忆:社会情感信息处理在老年时是否不那么灵活?

Memory for reputational trait information: is social-emotional information processing less flexible in old age?

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2013 Dec;28(4):984-995. doi: 10.1037/a0034266.

DOI:10.1037/a0034266
PMID:24364403
Abstract

How do younger and older adults remember reputational trait information about other people? In the present study, trustworthy-looking and untrustworthy-looking faces were paired with cooperation or cheating in a cooperation game. In a surprise source-memory test, participants were asked to rate the likability of the faces, and were required to remember whether the faces were associated with negative or positive outcomes. The social expectations of younger and older adults were clearly affected by a priori facial trustworthiness. Facial trustworthiness was associated with high cooperation-game investments, high likability ratings, and a tendency toward guessing that a face belonged to a cooperator instead of a cheater in both age groups. Consistent with previous results showing that emotional memory is spared from age-related decline, memory for the association between faces and emotional reputational information was well preserved in older adults. However, younger adults used a flexible encoding strategy to remember the social interaction partners. Source-memory was best for information that violated their (positive) expectations. Older adults, in contrast, showed a uniform memory bias for negative social information; their memory performance was not modulated by their expectations. This finding suggests that older adults are less likely to adjust their encoding strategies to their social expectations than younger adults. This may be in line with older adults' motivational goals to avoid risks in social interactions.

摘要

年轻人和老年人如何记住他人的声誉特征信息?在本研究中,将看起来值得信赖和不值得信赖的面孔与合作或欺骗合作游戏配对。在一个惊喜的来源记忆测试中,参与者被要求对面孔的可爱程度进行评分,并被要求记住面孔是与负面还是正面结果相关联。年轻人和老年人的社会期望显然受到先验面部可信度的影响。面部可信度与高合作游戏投资、高可爱度评分以及在两个年龄组中都倾向于猜测一个面孔属于合作者而不是骗子有关。与先前的结果一致,即情绪记忆不受与年龄相关的下降影响,老年人对面孔和情绪声誉信息之间关联的记忆保存完好。然而,年轻人使用灵活的编码策略来记住社交互动伙伴。对于违反他们(正面)期望的信息,源记忆效果最佳。相比之下,老年人对负面社交信息表现出一致的记忆偏差;他们的记忆表现不受期望的调节。这一发现表明,老年人不太可能像年轻人那样根据自己的社会期望调整自己的编码策略。这可能符合老年人在社交互动中避免风险的动机目标。

相似文献

1
Memory for reputational trait information: is social-emotional information processing less flexible in old age?对声誉特质信息的记忆:社会情感信息处理在老年时是否不那么灵活?
Psychol Aging. 2013 Dec;28(4):984-995. doi: 10.1037/a0034266.
2
On the flexibility of social source memory: a test of the emotional incongruity hypothesis.社会来源记忆的灵活性:情绪不和谐假说的检验。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Nov;38(6):1512-29. doi: 10.1037/a0028219. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
3
Does facial resemblance enhance cooperation?长相相似是否会增强合作?
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047809. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
4
The infamous among us: Enhanced reputational memory for uncooperative ingroup members.我们当中声名狼藉之人:对不合作的群体成员的声誉记忆增强。
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
5
Appearance-based first impressions and person memory.基于外貌的第一印象与人物记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Mar;41(2):456-72. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000034. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
6
Own-Age Bias and Positivity Effects in Facial Recognition.面部识别中的自身年龄偏差和积极效应。
Exp Aging Res. 2018 Oct-Dec;44(5):411-426. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2018.1521493. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
7
Aging and attentional biases for emotional faces.衰老与对情绪面孔的注意偏向
Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):409-15. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01455.
8
Remembering the bad ones: Does the source memory advantage for cheaters influence our later actions positively?记住不好的事情:骗子的源记忆优势是否会对我们的后续行为产生积极影响?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Oct;74(10):1669-1685. doi: 10.1177/17470218211007822. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
9
The Older Adult Positivity Effect in Evaluations of Trustworthiness: Emotion Regulation or Cognitive Capacity?老年人在可信度评估中的积极效应:情绪调节还是认知能力?
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):e0169823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169823. eCollection 2017.
10
Event-related potentials in response to cheating and cooperation in a social dilemma game.社会困境博弈中对作弊与合作反应的事件相关电位
Psychophysiology. 2016 Feb;53(2):216-28. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12561. Epub 2015 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Facial Trustworthiness Influences Age Differences in Visual Attention Toward Credible Versus Non-credible Messages.面部可信度影响对可信与不可信信息视觉关注的年龄差异。
Innov Aging. 2023 Jun 9;7(5):igad051. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad051. eCollection 2023.
2
Enhanced source memory for cheaters with higher resemblance to own-culture typical faces.对与自身文化典型面孔相似度更高的作弊者的源记忆增强。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Apr;30(2):700-711. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02177-y. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
3
Age differences in facial trustworthiness perception are diminished by affective processing.
情感加工可减少面部可信度感知中的年龄差异。
Eur J Ageing. 2021 Jul 23;19(3):413-422. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00643-5. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Memory and metamemory for social interactions: Evidence for a metamemory expectancy illusion.社会互动的记忆和元记忆:元记忆期望错觉的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jan;49(1):14-31. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01071-z.
5
Is knowledge reliance in source guessing a cognitive trait? Examining stability across time and domain.在源猜测中依赖知识是否是一种认知特征?考察跨时间和领域的稳定性。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Feb;48(2):256-276. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-01008-1.
6
Maternal nurturing experience affects the perception and recognition of adult and infant facial expressions.母亲的养育经验会影响其对成人和婴儿面部表情的感知和识别。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 23;13(10):e0205738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205738. eCollection 2018.
7
Separating conditional and unconditional cooperation in a sequential Prisoner's Dilemma game.在序贯囚徒困境博弈中区分条件合作和无条件合作。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187952. eCollection 2017.
8
Cognitive Load Does Not Affect the Behavioral and Cognitive Foundations of Social Cooperation.认知负荷不影响社会合作的行为和认知基础。
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 31;7:1312. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01312. eCollection 2016.