Zebrowitz Leslie A, Boshyan Jasmine, Ward Noreen, Gutchess Angela, Hadjikhani Nouchine
Department of Psychology, MS 062, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States of America.
MGH/HST Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard University, Charlestown, MA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):e0169823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169823. eCollection 2017.
An older adult positivity effect, i.e., the tendency for older adults to favor positive over negative stimulus information more than do younger adults, has been previously shown in attention, memory, and evaluations. This effect has been attributed to greater emotion regulation in older adults. In the case of attention and memory, this explanation has been supported by some evidence that the older adult positivity effect is most pronounced for negative stimuli, which would motivate emotion regulation, and that it is reduced by cognitive load, which would impede emotion regulation. We investigated whether greater older adult positivity in the case of evaluative responses to faces is also enhanced for negative stimuli and attenuated by cognitive load, as an emotion regulation explanation would predict. In two studies, younger and older adults rated trustworthiness of faces that varied in valence both under low and high cognitive load, with the latter manipulated by a distracting backwards counting task. In Study 1, face valence was manipulated by attractiveness (low /disfigured faces, medium, high/fashion models' faces). In Study 2, face valence was manipulated by trustworthiness (low, medium, high). Both studies revealed a significant older adult positivity effect. However, contrary to an emotion regulation account, this effect was not stronger for more negative faces, and cognitive load increased rather than decreased the rated trustworthiness of negatively valenced faces. Although inconsistent with emotion regulation, the latter effect is consistent with theory and research arguing that more cognitive resources are required to process negative stimuli, because they are more cognitively elaborated than positive ones. The finding that increased age and increased cognitive load both enhanced the positivity of trustworthy ratings suggests that the older adult positivity effect in evaluative ratings of faces may reflect age-related declines in cognitive capacity rather than increases in the regulation of negative emotions.
老年人积极效应,即与年轻人相比,老年人更倾向于偏好积极刺激信息而非消极刺激信息,此前已在注意力、记忆力和评价方面得到证实。这种效应被归因于老年人更强的情绪调节能力。在注意力和记忆力方面,这一解释得到了一些证据的支持,即老年人积极效应在消极刺激方面最为明显,这会激发情绪调节,而认知负荷会削弱该效应,因为认知负荷会阻碍情绪调节。我们研究了在对面部进行评价性反应时,老年人更强的积极倾向是否也会在消极刺激下增强,并像情绪调节解释所预测的那样受到认知负荷的削弱。在两项研究中,年轻和年长的成年人在低认知负荷和高认知负荷条件下对面部的可信度进行评分,后者通过干扰性的倒数任务来操纵。在研究1中,面部效价通过吸引力来操纵(低/毁容的面部、中等、高/时尚模特的面部)。在研究2中,面部效价通过可信度来操纵(低、中、高)。两项研究均揭示了显著的老年人积极效应。然而,与情绪调节的解释相反,这种效应在更消极的面部上并不更强,而且认知负荷增加而非降低了负性效价面部的可信度评分。尽管与情绪调节不一致,但后一种效应与理论和研究一致,该理论和研究认为处理消极刺激需要更多的认知资源,因为它们比积极刺激在认知上更复杂。年龄增长和认知负荷增加都增强了可信评分的积极性这一发现表明,在对面部的评价性评分中,老年人积极效应可能反映了与年龄相关 的认知能力下降,而非消极情绪调节能力的增强。