• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波兰对电子健康解决方案使用的促进因素和障碍的认知:一项定性研究。

The perception of facilitators and barriers to the use of e-health solutions in Poland: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Smoła Paulina, Młoźniak Iwona, Wojcieszko Monika, Zwierczyk Urszula, Kobryn Mateusz, Rzepecka Elżbieta, Duplaga Mariusz

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion and e-Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Skawińska Str. 20, Krakow, 31-066, Poland.

Department of Epidemiology and Population Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Skawińska Str. 20, Krakow, 31-066, Poland.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02791-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02791-x
PMID:39695644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11653833/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

E-health entails the use of information and communication technologies in support of health and health-related activities. E-health increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland. The pandemic showed that the e-health environment may be an important element of the response to epidemiological challenges. Polish citizens were provided with an array of e-health tools supporting the provision of health services.

METHODS

The main aim of the study was to assess the knowledge, use, and opinions about e-health solutions in Polish society. Fifty participants representing the general population took part in in-depth interviews. The interviews were conducted face-to-face with participants in their homes or via a teleconferencing platform from November 2023 to January 2024. At first, the interviewees were recruited by convenience, and at a later stage, a snowballing approach was applied. A semi-structured guide covered the knowledge about and use of e-health solutions, attitudes toward new technologies, and opinions about artificial intelligence and robots in healthcare. The interviewers interviewed 50 participants, of whom 26 were females. The interview transcriptions were analyzed with MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2022 (Release 22.7.0). An approach based on thematic analysis was employed to evaluate the interviews' content.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis of the interviews resulted in the identification of three main themes: (1) knowledge about e-health, (2) barriers, and (3) facilitators of e-health use. Recognition of the term 'e-health' was limited among study participants, although they used e-health solutions frequently. The main barriers included limited digital skills and unfavorable attitudes to new technologies. Some of the participants complained about technical difficulties, e.g., poor Internet access. The main facilitators identified based on the interviews include saving time and reducing costs, as well as the ability to access medical records in one repository, as in the case of the Internet Patient Account. Some people believed e-health to be an element of progress. Overall, the study participants supported sharing their medical data for research.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing e-health solutions seems to be perceived as an inevitable consequence of technological progress. However, a lack of adequate technical skills remains one of the major obstacles to efficiently utilizing e-health's potential.

摘要

背景

电子健康涉及使用信息和通信技术来支持健康及与健康相关的活动。在波兰,新冠疫情期间电子健康显著增长。疫情表明,电子健康环境可能是应对流行病学挑战的重要因素。波兰公民获得了一系列支持提供医疗服务的电子健康工具。

方法

该研究的主要目的是评估波兰社会对电子健康解决方案的知识、使用情况及看法。五十名代表普通人群的参与者参加了深入访谈。访谈于2023年11月至2024年1月在参与者家中面对面进行或通过电话会议平台进行。起初,受访者通过便利抽样招募,后期采用滚雪球抽样法。一份半结构化指南涵盖了对电子健康解决方案的知识和使用、对新技术的态度以及对医疗保健中人工智能和机器人的看法。访谈者采访了50名参与者,其中26名是女性。访谈转录本使用MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2022(版本22.7.0)进行分析。采用基于主题分析的方法来评估访谈内容。

结果

访谈的主题分析确定了三个主要主题:(1)电子健康知识,(2)障碍,(3)电子健康使用的促进因素。尽管研究参与者经常使用电子健康解决方案,但对“电子健康”一词的认知有限。主要障碍包括数字技能有限和对新技术的负面态度。一些参与者抱怨技术困难,例如网络接入不佳。根据访谈确定的主要促进因素包括节省时间和降低成本,以及能够在一个存储库中访问病历,如互联网患者账户的情况。一些人认为电子健康是进步的一个因素。总体而言,研究参与者支持为研究分享他们的医疗数据。

结论

实施电子健康解决方案似乎被视为技术进步的必然结果。然而,缺乏足够的技术技能仍然是有效利用电子健康潜力的主要障碍之一。

相似文献

1
The perception of facilitators and barriers to the use of e-health solutions in Poland: a qualitative study.波兰对电子健康解决方案使用的促进因素和障碍的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02791-x.
2
Manifestation of Health Denialism in Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccination: A Qualitative Study.对新冠疫苗接种态度中健康否定主义的表现:一项定性研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Dec 6;11(12):1822. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11121822.
3
Attitudes toward artificial intelligence and robots in healthcare in the general population: a qualitative study.普通人群对医疗保健领域人工智能和机器人的态度:一项定性研究。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jan 27;7:1458685. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1458685. eCollection 2025.
4
"Where to find those doctors?" A qualitative study on barriers and facilitators in access to and utilization of health care services by Polish migrants in Norway.“去哪里找那些医生?”一项关于挪威波兰移民获得和利用医疗保健服务的障碍与促进因素的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 1;16(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1715-9.
5
Patient and caregiver perspectives on virtual care: a patient-oriented qualitative study.患者和照护者对虚拟医疗的看法:一项以患者为导向的定性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Mar 1;10(1):E165-E172. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210065. Print 2022 Jan-Mar.
6
Dr. Google: Physicians-The Web-Patients Triangle: Digital Skills and Attitudes towards e-Health Solutions among Physicians in South Eastern Poland-A Cross-Sectional Study in a Pre-COVID-19 Era.谷歌医生:网络-患者三角关系:波兰东南部医生的数字技能和对电子健康解决方案的态度——新冠疫情前的横断面研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 5;20(2):978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20020978.
7
Exploring Stakeholder Perspectives on the Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Digital Technologies for Heart Disease Diagnosis: Qualitative Study.探索利益相关者对实施心脏病诊断数字技术的障碍和促进因素的看法:定性研究
JMIR Cardio. 2025 Mar 5;9:e66464. doi: 10.2196/66464.
8
Understanding health care workers' mental health needs: insights from a qualitative study on digital interventions.了解医护人员的心理健康需求:一项关于数字干预措施的定性研究的见解
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 7;25(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12678-w.
9
Facilitators and barriers to the transition from outpatient clinic visits to home-based check-ups for children being treated with growth hormone: a mixed-methods study.促进和阻碍儿童生长激素治疗患者从门诊就诊到家庭检查过渡的因素:一项混合方法研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Apr;183(4):1857-1870. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05408-z. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
10
Organising general practice for care homes: a multi-method study.为养老院组织全科医疗服务:一项多方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Apr;13(11):1-68. doi: 10.3310/YNDV6358.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction with Healthcare Services in Poland.影响波兰患者对医疗服务满意度的因素。
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jun 19;31:e948225. doi: 10.12659/MSM.948225.

本文引用的文献

1
Trust and Health Information Exchanges: Qualitative Analysis of the Intent to Share Personal Health Information.信任与健康信息交流:个人健康信息共享意向的定性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 30;25:e41635. doi: 10.2196/41635.
2
Measuring the willingness to share personal health information: a systematic review.测量个人健康信息共享意愿:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;11:1213615. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1213615. eCollection 2023.
3
Offerings and User Demands of eHealth Services in Spain: National Survey.西班牙电子健康服务的提供与用户需求:全国性调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 18;25:e42304. doi: 10.2196/42304.
4
User satisfaction and the readiness-to-use e-health applications in the future in Polish society in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.用户满意度和未来波兰社会在 COVID-19 大流行早期阶段对易于使用的电子健康应用程序的准备情况:一项横断面研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Dec;168:104904. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104904. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
5
A Nationwide Natural Experiment of e-Health Implementation during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland: User Satisfaction and the Ease-of-Use of Remote Physician's Visits.一项关于 COVID-19 大流行期间波兰电子医疗实施的全国自然实验:用户满意度和远程医生访视的易用性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;19(14):8338. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148338.
6
The spread of technological innovations: effects of psychology, culture and policy interventions.技术创新的传播:心理学、文化及政策干预的影响
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jun 22;9(6):211833. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211833. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Factors Associated With Willingness to Share Health Information: Rapid Review.与健康信息分享意愿相关的因素:快速综述
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Feb 9;9(1):e20702. doi: 10.2196/20702.
8
Telehealth utilization during the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review.新冠疫情期间的远程医疗应用:一项系统综述。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Nov;138:104878. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104878. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
9
Public perceptions on data sharing: key insights from the UK and the USA.公众对数据共享的看法:来自英国和美国的关键见解。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Sep;2(9):e444-e446. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30161-8. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
10
Barriers to patient, provider, and caregiver adoption and use of electronic personal health records in chronic care: a systematic review.慢性病患者、医护人员和照护者采用和使用电子个人健康记录的障碍:系统综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01159-1.