Zeguers M H T, Snellings P, Huizenga H M, van der Molen M W
a Department of Psychology , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 Oct;67(10):1925-43. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.879192. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
In opaque orthographies, the activation of orthographic and phonological codes follows distinct time courses during visual word recognition. However, it is unclear how orthography and phonology are accessed in more transparent orthographies. Therefore, we conducted time course analyses of masked priming effects in the transparent Dutch orthography. The first study used targets with small phonological differences between phonological and orthographic primes, which are typical in transparent orthographies. Results showed consistent orthographic priming effects, yet phonological priming effects were absent. The second study explicitly manipulated the strength of the phonological difference and revealed that both orthographic and phonological priming effects became identifiable when phonological differences were strong enough. This suggests that, similar to opaque orthographies, strong phonological differences are a prerequisite to separate orthographic and phonological priming effects in transparent orthographies. Orthographic and phonological priming appeared to follow distinct time courses, with orthographic codes being quickly translated into phonological codes and phonology dominating the remainder of the lexical access phase.
在不透明的正字法中,在视觉单词识别过程中,正字法和语音代码的激活遵循不同的时间进程。然而,尚不清楚在更透明的正字法中,正字法和语音是如何被激活的。因此,我们对透明荷兰正字法中的掩蔽启动效应进行了时间进程分析。第一项研究使用了在语音和正字法启动词之间存在微小语音差异的目标词,这在透明正字法中很典型。结果显示出一致的正字法启动效应,但没有语音启动效应。第二项研究明确操纵了语音差异的强度,结果表明,当语音差异足够大时,正字法和语音启动效应都变得可识别。这表明,与不透明正字法类似,强烈的语音差异是在透明正字法中区分正字法和语音启动效应的先决条件。正字法和语音启动效应似乎遵循不同的时间进程,正字法代码迅速转化为语音代码,语音在词汇通达阶段的其余时间占主导地位。