• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

9项卑尔根倦怠量表:跨组织的因素效度及纵向数据测量

The 9-item Bergen Burnout Inventory: factorial validity across organizations and measurements of longitudinal data.

作者信息

Feldt Taru, Rantanen Johanna, Hyvönen Katriina, Mäkikangas Anne, Huhtala Mari, Pihlajasaari Pia, Kinnunen Ulla

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

Ind Health. 2014;52(2):102-12. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2013-0059. Epub 2013 Dec 21.

DOI:10.2486/indhealth.2013-0059
PMID:24366535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4202758/
Abstract

The present study tested the factorial validity of the 9-item Bergen Burnout Inventory (BBI-9). The BBI-9 is comprised of three core dimensions: (1) exhaustion at work; (2) cynicism toward the meaning of work; and (3) sense of inadequacy at work. The study further investigated whether the three-factor structure of the BBI-9 remains the same across different organizations (group invariance) and measurement time points (time invariance). The factorial group invariance was tested using a cross-sectional design with data pertaining to managers (n=742), and employees working in a bank (n=162), an engineering office (n=236), a public sector organization divided into three service areas: administration (n=102), education and culture (n=581), and social affairs and health (n=1,505). Factorial time invariance was tested using longitudinal data pertaining to managers, with three measurements over a four-year follow-up period. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the three-factor structure of the BBI-9 was invariant across cross-sectional samples. The factorial invariance was also supported across measurement times. To conclude, the factorial structure of the BBI-9 was found to remain the same regardless of the sample properties and measurement times.

摘要

本研究检验了9项卑尔根倦怠量表(BBI-9)的因子效度。BBI-9由三个核心维度组成:(1)工作倦怠;(2)对工作意义的玩世不恭态度;(3)工作中的不足感。该研究进一步调查了BBI-9的三因素结构在不同组织(组间不变性)和测量时间点(时间不变性)上是否保持一致。使用横断面设计对因子组间不变性进行了检验,数据涉及经理(n=742)以及在银行工作的员工(n=162)、工程办公室的员工(n=236)、分为三个服务领域的公共部门组织的员工:行政部门(n=102)、教育和文化部门(n=581)以及社会事务和卫生部门(n=1505)。使用与经理相关的纵向数据对因子时间不变性进行了检验,在四年的随访期内进行了三次测量。验证性因子分析表明,BBI-9的三因素结构在横断面样本中是不变的。在不同测量时间点也支持因子不变性。总之,发现BBI-9的因子结构无论样本属性和测量时间如何都保持不变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ba/4202758/85623884318c/indhealth-52-102-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ba/4202758/85623884318c/indhealth-52-102-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ba/4202758/85623884318c/indhealth-52-102-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The 9-item Bergen Burnout Inventory: factorial validity across organizations and measurements of longitudinal data.9项卑尔根倦怠量表:跨组织的因素效度及纵向数据测量
Ind Health. 2014;52(2):102-12. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2013-0059. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
2
Bergen Burnout Inventory: reliability and validity among Finnish and Estonian managers.卑尔根倦怠量表:芬兰和爱沙尼亚经理人群体的信度和效度。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Aug;84(6):635-45. doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0594-3. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
3
Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Athlete Burnout Questionnaire (ABQ).运动员倦怠问卷(ABQ)的因素效度和测量不变性。
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2024 Jul;73:102638. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102638. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
4
Assessment of burnout for Chinese human service professionals: a study of factorial validity and invariance.中国人类服务专业人员职业倦怠评估:因子效度与不变性研究
J Clin Psychol. 1998 Jan;54(1):55-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199801)54:1<55::aid-jclp6>3.0.co;2-t.
5
Factorial validity of the effort-reward imbalance scale: evidence from multi-sample and three-wave follow-up studies.工作投入-回报失衡量表的效标关联效度:来自多样本和三波随访研究的证据。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013 Aug;86(6):645-56. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0798-9. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
6
Psychometric properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory for Human Services among Italian nurses: a test of alternative models.《Maslach 职业倦怠量表在意大利护士中的心理测量学特性:对替代模型的检验》
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Mar;69(3):697-707. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06114.x. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
7
Structural validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory and influence of depressive symptoms in banking workplace: Unfastening the occupational conundrum.职业倦怠量表结构效度与银行工作场所抑郁症状的影响:解开职业难题。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Sep;267:168-174. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.069. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
8
[Factorial validity of the Spanish adaptation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey].[《马氏职业倦怠量表通用版西班牙文改编版的因素效度》]
Salud Publica Mex. 2002 Jan-Feb;44(1):33-40.
9
Validation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey on a Representative Sample of Dominican Teachers: Normative Data.多米尼加教师代表性样本中马氏职业倦怠量表通用版的验证:常模数据
Span J Psychol. 2016 Nov 22;19:E83. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.91.
10
[The factorial and construct validity of the Japanese Burnout Scale among service workers].[日本服务业员工倦怠量表的效标效度和结构效度]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2014 Oct;85(4):364-72. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.85.13214.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between physician burnout and patient safety: study protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.医生职业倦怠与患者安全的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析概述的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 21;14(11):e089687. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089687.
2
The quiet quitting scale: Development and initial validation.“安静离职”量表:编制与初步验证
AIMS Public Health. 2023 Oct 17;10(4):828-848. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023055. eCollection 2023.
3
Workplace Ethical Climate and Workers' Burnout: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach.结构模型评估与修正:一种区间估计方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.
2
Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) Analyses of Cross-Cultural Data: Practical and Theoretical Issues.跨文化数据的均值与协方差结构(MACS)分析:实践与理论问题
Multivariate Behav Res. 1997 Jan 1;32(1):53-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3.
3
Do low burnout and high work engagement always go hand in hand?: investigation of the energy and identification dimensions in longitudinal data.
工作场所的道德氛围与员工职业倦怠:一项系统综述。
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2023 Oct;20(5):405-414. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230502.
4
Factors determining safety culture in hospitals: a scoping review.影响医院安全文化的因素:范围综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Oct;12(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002310.
5
Behind the scenes of the healthcare COVID-19 pandemic crisis: potential affecting factors of healthcare work sustainability in Romania during 2020-2022.新冠疫情期间医疗保健领域幕后情况:2020 - 2022年罗马尼亚医疗工作可持续性的潜在影响因素
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 1;14:1179803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1179803. eCollection 2023.
6
Coping with burnout and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on workers' mental health: A systematic review.应对职业倦怠以及新冠疫情对员工心理健康的影响:一项系统综述
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 16;14:1139260. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1139260. eCollection 2023.
7
Do intensified job demands predict burnout? How motivation to lead and leadership status may have a moderating effect.高强度的工作要求能预测职业倦怠吗?领导动机和领导地位可能会产生怎样的调节作用?
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1048487. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1048487. eCollection 2023.
8
Gender role perspectives and job burnout.性别角色观念与职业倦怠。
Rev Econ Househ. 2022;20(2):447-470. doi: 10.1007/s11150-021-09579-2. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
9
Collaborative care for depression management in primary care: A randomized roll-out trial using a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation design.基层医疗中抑郁症管理的协作式照护:一项采用2型混合效果-实施设计的随机推广试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Jul 26;23:100823. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100823. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Drivers or Drifters? The "Who" and "Why" of Leader Role Occupancy-A Mixed-Method Study.驱动者还是漂流者?领导者角色占据的“何人”与“为何”——一项混合方法研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 4;12:573924. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573924. eCollection 2021.
低倦怠高工作投入总是相伴相生吗?:纵向数据中能量和识别维度的调查。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2012 Jan;25(1):93-116. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2011.565411. Epub 2011 May 24.
4
Bergen Burnout Inventory: reliability and validity among Finnish and Estonian managers.卑尔根倦怠量表:芬兰和爱沙尼亚经理人群体的信度和效度。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Aug;84(6):635-45. doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0594-3. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
5
Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic.确保尺度差异卡方检验统计量的正值性。
Psychometrika. 2010 Jun;75(2):243-248. doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.
6
Efficacy or inefficacy, that's the question: burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs.有效还是无效,这就是问题所在:职业倦怠与工作投入,以及它们与效能信念的关系。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2007 Jun;20(2):177-96. doi: 10.1080/10615800701217878.
7
Take care! The evaluation of a team-based burnout intervention program for oncology care providers.注意!一项针对肿瘤护理提供者的基于团队的职业倦怠干预项目评估。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):213-27. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.213.
8
Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses.检验嵌套协方差结构模型之间的差异:功效分析与原假设
Psychol Methods. 2006 Mar;11(1):19-35. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.19.
9
Burnout in the general population. Results from the Finnish Health 2000 Study.普通人群中的职业倦怠。芬兰健康2000研究的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006 Jan;41(1):11-7. doi: 10.1007/s00127-005-0011-5. Epub 2006 Jan 1.
10
The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons.工作中努力-回报失衡的测量:欧洲比较
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Apr;58(8):1483-99. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00351-4.