Leone Janel M, Lape Megan E, Xu Yili
The Sage Colleges, Albany, NY, USA
Syracuse University, NY, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2014 Jul;29(10):1850-76. doi: 10.1177/0886260513511701. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
This study examined the help-seeking decisions of low-income women (n = 389) in two types of physically violent heterosexual relationships-intimate terrorism (i.e., physical violence used within a general pattern of coercive control) and situationally violent (i.e., physical violence that is not part of a general pattern of coercive control). Intimate terrorism victims were significantly more likely than situational couple violence victims to cite fear as a reason for not seeking help from the police, medical centers, and counselors/agencies. In contrast, situational couple violence victims more often said that they did not need help. Regression analyses also indicate that additional violence-related factors predict women's help-seeking. Findings emphasize the importance of distinguishing between types of male partner violence and recognizing women's exertions of personal choice and perceptions of dangerousness when examining their decisions about seeking help from service providers.
本研究考察了处于两种身体暴力异性恋关系中的低收入女性(n = 389)的求助决策,这两种关系分别是亲密恐怖主义(即在一般强制控制模式下使用身体暴力)和情境性暴力(即不属于一般强制控制模式的身体暴力)。与情境性伴侣暴力的受害者相比,亲密恐怖主义的受害者更有可能将恐惧作为不向警方、医疗中心和咨询师/机构求助的原因。相比之下,情境性伴侣暴力的受害者更常表示她们不需要帮助。回归分析还表明,其他与暴力相关的因素可预测女性的求助行为。研究结果强调了在考察女性向服务提供者求助的决策时,区分男性伴侣暴力类型以及认识到女性的个人选择和对危险的认知的重要性。