Suppr超能文献

失语症中语义记忆的组织与获取

Organization of and access to semantic memory in aphasia.

作者信息

Koemeda-Lutz M, Cohen R, Meier E

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1987 Mar;30(2):321-37. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(87)90106-4.

Abstract

Previous experiments with picture sorting and matching tasks have shown aphasics to give more deviant responses than controls when decisions require the identification of single features of concepts, whereas their responses are close to normal whenever decisions have to be based on the relative overlap of broad associative fields. The present experiment was designed to compare picture matching based on single features (property verification) with picture matching based on category membership (category verification). Fifty-five aphasics (14 amnesics, 18 Brocas, 13 Wernickes, 10 global aphasics) and 29 right-brain-damaged control patients served as subjects. Aphasics were poorer than right hemisphere controls on property as well as on category sortings, especially when the sorting criterion was not a dominant property of the object or when the object in question was not a typical member of the criterion category. Contrary to other studies, the "semantic distance" variable did not differentially affect Brocas as compared to Wernickes aphasics. Verbal labels denoting the sorting criterion and added to the picture presentation did not affect the performance of the right hemisphere controls but significantly improved that of the aphasics.

摘要

先前进行的图片分类和匹配任务实验表明,在需要识别概念单一特征的决策过程中,失语症患者比对照组给出的异常反应更多;而在决策必须基于广泛联想领域的相对重叠时,他们的反应接近正常。本实验旨在比较基于单一特征的图片匹配(属性验证)和基于类别归属的图片匹配(类别验证)。五十五名失语症患者(14名遗忘型失语症患者、18名布罗卡失语症患者、13名韦尼克失语症患者、10名完全性失语症患者)和29名右脑损伤的对照患者作为研究对象。失语症患者在属性分类以及类别分类方面比右半球对照组表现更差,尤其是当分类标准不是物体的主要属性时,或者当所讨论的物体不是标准类别的典型成员时。与其他研究相反,“语义距离”变量对布罗卡失语症患者和韦尼克失语症患者的影响没有差异。表示分类标准并添加到图片展示中的语言标签对右半球对照组的表现没有影响,但显著提高了失语症患者的表现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验