Suppr超能文献

目击者为何会出错。

Why eyewitnesses fail.

作者信息

Albright Thomas D

机构信息

The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7758-7764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706891114.

Abstract

Eyewitness identifications play an important role in the investigation and prosecution of crimes, but it is well known that eyewitnesses make mistakes, often with serious consequences. In light of these concerns, the National Academy of Sciences recently convened a panel of experts to undertake a comprehensive study of current practice and use of eyewitness testimony, with an eye toward understanding why identification errors occur and what can be done to prevent them. The work of this committee led to key findings and recommendations for reform, detailed in a consensus report entitled In this review, I focus on the scientific issues that emerged from this study, along with brief discussions of how these issues led to specific recommendations for additional research, best practices for law enforcement, and use of eyewitness evidence by the courts.

摘要

目击者指认在犯罪调查和起诉中发挥着重要作用,但众所周知,目击者会犯错,而且往往会造成严重后果。鉴于这些担忧,美国国家科学院最近召集了一个专家小组,对目击者证词的当前实践和使用情况进行全面研究,旨在了解为何会出现指认错误以及如何预防这些错误。该委员会的工作产生了关键的调查结果和改革建议,这些内容在一份题为《[报告名称未给出]》的共识报告中有详细阐述。在本综述中,我将重点关注这项研究中出现的科学问题,并简要讨论这些问题如何促成了关于进一步研究的具体建议、执法的最佳实践以及法院对目击者证据的使用。

相似文献

1
Why eyewitnesses fail.目击者为何会出错。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7758-7764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706891114.
2
Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value.目击证据:提高其证据价值。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Nov;7(2):45-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00027.x. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
3
Eyewitness testimony.目击者证词。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:277-95. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145028. Epub 2002 Jun 10.
5
Rethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory.重新思考目击者记忆的可靠性。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 May;13(3):324-335. doi: 10.1177/1745691617734878.
9
Effects of cannabis on eyewitness memory: A field study.大麻对目击者记忆的影响:一项现场研究。
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2018 Jul-Aug;32(4):420-428. doi: 10.1002/acp.3414. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
10
Science, evidence, law, and justice.科学、证据、法律和正义。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2312529120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2312529120. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

4
A call for open science in forensics.呼吁法医学领域的开放科学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 11;121(24):e2321809121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321809121. Epub 2024 May 23.
7
Scientific Thinking About Legal Truth.关于法律真相的科学思考。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 6;13:918282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918282. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups.评估警方列队辨认中目击证人指认的可靠性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 12;113(2):304-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516814112. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
9
Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage.序列列队优势的稳健性。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009 Jun;15(2):140-152. doi: 10.1037/a0015082.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验