• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目击者为何会出错。

Why eyewitnesses fail.

作者信息

Albright Thomas D

机构信息

The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7758-7764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706891114.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1706891114
PMID:28739937
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5544328/
Abstract

Eyewitness identifications play an important role in the investigation and prosecution of crimes, but it is well known that eyewitnesses make mistakes, often with serious consequences. In light of these concerns, the National Academy of Sciences recently convened a panel of experts to undertake a comprehensive study of current practice and use of eyewitness testimony, with an eye toward understanding why identification errors occur and what can be done to prevent them. The work of this committee led to key findings and recommendations for reform, detailed in a consensus report entitled In this review, I focus on the scientific issues that emerged from this study, along with brief discussions of how these issues led to specific recommendations for additional research, best practices for law enforcement, and use of eyewitness evidence by the courts.

摘要

目击者指认在犯罪调查和起诉中发挥着重要作用,但众所周知,目击者会犯错,而且往往会造成严重后果。鉴于这些担忧,美国国家科学院最近召集了一个专家小组,对目击者证词的当前实践和使用情况进行全面研究,旨在了解为何会出现指认错误以及如何预防这些错误。该委员会的工作产生了关键的调查结果和改革建议,这些内容在一份题为《[报告名称未给出]》的共识报告中有详细阐述。在本综述中,我将重点关注这项研究中出现的科学问题,并简要讨论这些问题如何促成了关于进一步研究的具体建议、执法的最佳实践以及法院对目击者证据的使用。

相似文献

1
Why eyewitnesses fail.目击者为何会出错。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7758-7764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706891114.
2
Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value.目击证据:提高其证据价值。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Nov;7(2):45-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00027.x. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
3
Eyewitness testimony.目击者证词。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:277-95. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145028. Epub 2002 Jun 10.
4
The importance of decision bias for predicting eyewitness lineup choices: toward a Lineup Skills Test.决策偏差对预测目击证人列队辨认选择的重要性:迈向列队辨认技能测试
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Jan 28;4(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0150-3.
5
Rethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory.重新思考目击者记忆的可靠性。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 May;13(3):324-335. doi: 10.1177/1745691617734878.
6
Initial eyewitness confidence reliably predicts eyewitness identification accuracy.最初的目击者信心能可靠地预测目击者指认的准确性。
Am Psychol. 2015 Sep;70(6):515-26. doi: 10.1037/a0039510.
7
Costs and Benefits of Eyewitness Identification Reform: Psychological Science and Public Policy.目击证人辨认改革的成本与收益:心理学科学与公共政策。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 May;7(3):238-59. doi: 10.1177/1745691612439584.
8
Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.使用真实目击者的双盲照片列队辨认:顺序与同时列队辨认程序的实验测试
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Feb;39(1):1-14. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000096. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
9
Effects of cannabis on eyewitness memory: A field study.大麻对目击者记忆的影响:一项现场研究。
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2018 Jul-Aug;32(4):420-428. doi: 10.1002/acp.3414. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
10
Science, evidence, law, and justice.科学、证据、法律和正义。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2312529120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2312529120. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A multi-item signal detection theory model for eyewitness identification.一种用于目击证人识别的多项目信号检测理论模型。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 22;10(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00652-3.
2
Prediction of Skin Color Using Forensic DNA Phenotyping in Asian Populations: A Focus on Thailand.在亚洲人群中使用法医DNA表型分析预测肤色:以泰国为重点
Biomolecules. 2025 Apr 9;15(4):548. doi: 10.3390/biom15040548.
3
Ethical Use of Social Media and Sharing of Patient Information by Medical Students at a University Hospital in Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Survey.沙特阿拉伯一家大学医院医学生对社交媒体的道德使用及患者信息共享:横断面调查
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Mar 24;11:e57812. doi: 10.2196/57812.
4
A call for open science in forensics.呼吁法医学领域的开放科学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 11;121(24):e2321809121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321809121. Epub 2024 May 23.
5
Memory accuracy, suggestibility and credibility in investigative interviews with native and non-native eyewitnesses.对母语和非母语目击者进行调查询问时的记忆准确性、易受暗示性和可信度。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 24;14:1240822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240822. eCollection 2023.
6
Acute alcohol intoxication and alcohol expectancy effects on women's memory for consensual and non-consensual sexual activity.急性酒精中毒及酒精预期效应对女性关于自愿和非自愿性活动记忆的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 1;13:1008563. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008563. eCollection 2022.
7
Scientific Thinking About Legal Truth.关于法律真相的科学思考。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 6;13:918282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918282. eCollection 2022.
8
Identifying criminals: No biasing effect of criminal context on recalled threat.识别罪犯:犯罪情境不会对回忆出的威胁产生偏见。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Nov;50(8):1735-1755. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01268-w. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
9
Towards Forensic DNA Phenotyping for Predicting Visible Traits in Dogs.朝向用于预测犬类可见特征的法医 DNA 表型分析。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Jun 11;12(6):908. doi: 10.3390/genes12060908.
10
Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt.犯罪类型和证据对有罪判决的影响建模。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Nov;2(11):856-866. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.目击证人信心与识别准确性之间的关系:新综合。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 May;18(1):10-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100616686966. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
2
Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups.评估警方列队辨认中目击证人指认的可靠性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 12;113(2):304-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516814112. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
3
Initial eyewitness confidence reliably predicts eyewitness identification accuracy.最初的目击者信心能可靠地预测目击者指认的准确性。
Am Psychol. 2015 Sep;70(6):515-26. doi: 10.1037/a0039510.
4
Evolution of the empirical and theoretical foundations of eyewitness identification reform.目击证人辨认改革的实证与理论基础的演变
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):251-67. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0516-y.
5
Random generalized linear model: a highly accurate and interpretable ensemble predictor.随机广义线性模型:一种高度准确且可解释的集成预测器。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 16;14:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-5.
6
Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.目击者记忆的受试者工作特征分析:比较同时呈现和序列呈现组别的诊断准确性。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2012 Dec;18(4):361-76. doi: 10.1037/a0030609.
7
Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability.序贯呈现阵容有助于减少有偏差的判断标准制定,但不能提高辨别力。
Law Hum Behav. 2012 Jun;36(3):247-55. doi: 10.1037/h0093923.
8
Perception and motivation in face recognition: a critical review of theories of the Cross-Race Effect.面孔识别中的知觉和动机:跨种族效应理论的批判性回顾。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012 May;16(2):116-42. doi: 10.1177/1088868311418987. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
9
Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage.序列列队优势的稳健性。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009 Jun;15(2):140-152. doi: 10.1037/a0015082.
10
Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage.阵容构成、嫌疑人位置以及序列阵容优势。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Jun;14(2):118-128. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.118.