Moelans Cathy B, Holst Frederik, Hellwinkel Olaf, Simon Ronald, van Diest Paul J
Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Section of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Clinical Science, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway ; Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e84189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084189. eCollection 2013.
Prevalence of ESR1 amplification in breast cancer is highly disputed and discrepancies have been related to different technical protocols and different scoring approaches. In addition, pre-mRNA artifacts have been proposed to influence outcome of ESR1 FISH analysis. We analyzed ESR1 gene copy number status combining an improved RNase FISH protocol with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) after laser microdissection. FISH showed a high prevalence of ESR1 gains and amplifications despite RNase treatment but MLPA did not confirm ESR1 copy number increases detected by FISH in more than half of cases. We suggest that the combination of the ESR1-specific intra-tumor heterogeneity and low-level copy number increase accounts for these discrepancies.
雌激素受体1(ESR1)基因扩增在乳腺癌中的发生率备受争议,差异与不同的技术方案和评分方法有关。此外,有人提出前体mRNA假象会影响ESR1荧光原位杂交(FISH)分析的结果。我们采用改进的核糖核酸酶FISH方案并结合激光显微切割后的多重连接依赖探针扩增技术(MLPA),分析ESR1基因拷贝数状态。尽管进行了核糖核酸酶处理,但FISH显示ESR1基因获得和扩增的发生率很高,不过MLPA并未证实超过半数病例中FISH检测到的ESR1拷贝数增加。我们认为,ESR1特异性肿瘤内异质性和低水平拷贝数增加共同导致了这些差异。