Suppr超能文献

GCS 对创伤性下腔静脉损伤患者死亡率的预测价值:16 例回顾性研究。

GCS as a predictor of mortality in patients with traumatic inferior vena cava injuries: a retrospective review of 16 cases.

机构信息

Adult Emergency Services, Surgery, Hospital Dr, Sotero del Rio, Concha y Toro, 3459 Puente Alto, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2013 Dec 29;8(1):59. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-8-59.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Recent research has determined Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) to be an independent predictor of mortality in patients with traumatic inferior vena cava (IVC) injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of GCS, as well as other factors previously described as determinants of mortality, in a cohort of patients presenting with traumatic IVC lesions.

METHODS

A 7-year retrospective review was undertaken of all trauma patients presenting to a tertiary care trauma center with trauma related IVC lesions. Factors described in the literature as associated with mortality were assessed with univariate analysis. ANOVA analysis of variance was used to compare means for continuous variables; dichotomous variables were assessed with Fischer's exact test. Logistic regression was performed on significant variables to assess determinants of mortality.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients with traumatic IVC injuries were identified, from January 2005 to December 2011. Six patients died (mortality, 37.5%); the mechanism of injury was blunt in one case (6.2%) and penetrating in the 15 others (93.7%). Seven patients underwent thoracotomy in the operating room (OR) to obtain vascular control (43.7%). Upon univariate analysis, non-survivors were significantly more likely than survivors to have lower mean arterial pressures (MAP) in the emergency room (ER) (45.6 +/- 8.6 vs. 76.5 +/- 25.4, p = 0.013), a lower GCS (8.1 +/- 4.1 vs. 14 +/- 2.8, p = 0.004), more severe injuries (ISS 60.3 +/- 3.5 vs 28.7 +/- 22.9, p = 0.0006), have undergone thoracotomy (83.3% vs. 16.6%, p = 0.024), and have a shorter operative time (105 +/- 59.8 min vs 189 +/- 65.3 min, p = 0.022). Logistic regression analysis revealed GCS as a significant inverse determinant of mortality (OR = 0.6, 0.46-0.95, p = 0.026). Other determinants of mortality by logistic regression were thoracotomy (OR = 20, 1.4-282.4, p = 0.027), and caval ligation as operative management (OR = 45, 2.28-885.6, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

GCS, the need to undergo thoracotomy, and caval ligation as operative management are significant predictors of mortality in patients with traumatic IVC injuries.

摘要

简介

最近的研究表明,格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)是创伤性下腔静脉(IVC)损伤患者死亡率的独立预测因素。本研究旨在评估 GCS 以及其他先前被描述为死亡率决定因素的因素在创伤性 IVC 损伤患者中的应用。

方法

对 2005 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月期间因创伤性 IVC 病变就诊于三级创伤中心的所有创伤患者进行了为期 7 年的回顾性分析。对文献中描述的与死亡率相关的因素进行了单因素分析。连续变量采用方差分析(ANOVA)进行比较;二项变量采用 Fisher 精确检验进行评估。对有意义的变量进行逻辑回归,以评估死亡率的决定因素。

结果

从 2005 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月,共确定了 16 例创伤性 IVC 损伤患者。6 例患者死亡(死亡率为 37.5%);1 例(6.2%)为钝性损伤,15 例(93.7%)为穿透性损伤。7 例患者在手术室(OR)行开胸术以获得血管控制(43.7%)。单因素分析显示,非幸存者在急诊室(ER)的平均动脉压(MAP)明显低于幸存者(45.6±8.6 与 76.5±25.4,p=0.013),GCS 评分明显低于幸存者(8.1±4.1 与 14±2.8,p=0.004),损伤严重程度更高(ISS 60.3±3.5 与 28.7±22.9,p=0.0006),需要开胸术(83.3%与 16.6%,p=0.024),手术时间更短(105±59.8 与 189±65.3,p=0.022)。逻辑回归分析显示 GCS 是死亡率的显著负向决定因素(OR=0.6,0.46-0.95,p=0.026)。逻辑回归分析的其他死亡率决定因素包括开胸术(OR=20,1.4-282.4,p=0.027)和腔静脉结扎作为手术治疗(OR=45,2.28-885.6,p=0.012)。

结论

GCS、开胸术的需要以及腔静脉结扎作为手术治疗是创伤性 IVC 损伤患者死亡率的重要预测因素。

相似文献

7
CT Appearance of Traumatic Inferior Vena Cava Injury.创伤性下腔静脉损伤的CT表现
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Oct;207(4):705-711. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15870. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
8
Outcome of ligation of the inferior vena cava in the modern era.当代下腔静脉结扎术的结果。
Am J Surg. 2010 Apr;199(4):500-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.013. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
10
Morbidity and mortality in elderly trauma patients.老年创伤患者的发病率和死亡率。
J Trauma. 1999 Apr;46(4):702-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199904000-00024.

引用本文的文献

1
Inferior vena cava injuries: Are we doing what we really must?下腔静脉损伤:我们是否在做我们真正必须做的事情?
Turk J Surg. 2024 Jun 28;40(2):119-125. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6363. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Traumatic Suprahepatic inferior vena cava injury survival of a rare case.创伤性肝上腔静脉损伤:1例罕见病例的生存情况
Trauma Case Rep. 2021 Sep 10;36:100535. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2021.100535. eCollection 2021 Dec.

本文引用的文献

2
Injuries of the inferior vena cava.下腔静脉损伤。
Surg Clin North Am. 2001 Dec;81(6):1431-47. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(01)80016-5.
6
Contemporary management strategy for major inferior vena caval injuries.
J Trauma. 1994 Jul;37(1):35-41; discussion 41-2. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199407000-00008.
7
Traumatic inferior vena caval injuries.创伤性下腔静脉损伤
Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;28(3-4):103-8. doi: 10.3109/14017439409099113.
8
Traumatic vena caval injuries.
Am J Surg. 1980 Nov;140(5):600-2. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90038-0.
9
Inferior vena cava injuries--a continuing challenge.下腔静脉损伤——一项持续存在的挑战。
J Trauma. 1983 Mar;23(3):207-12. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198303000-00005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验