• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国健康偏好的人口统计学差异。

Demographic differences in health preferences in the United States.

机构信息

*Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center and University of South Florida, Tampa, FL †Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC ‡Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL §Health Services, University of California, Los Angeles and RAND, Santa Monica, CA ∥Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL ¶Outcomes Research, Bethesda, MD.

出版信息

Med Care. 2014 Apr;52(4):307-13. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000066.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000066
PMID:24374420
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4031273/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The United States has a culturally and demographically diverse populace, and the aim of this study was to examine differences in health preferences by sex, age, ethnicity, and race.

METHODS

We assessed preferences for health outcomes defined by the PROMIS-29 survey in a sample of the US population. On the basis of the survey's 540 paired-comparisons trading off lifespan and 7 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), we compared the choices between men and women, adults age 18-54 years and 55 years and older, Hispanics and non-Hispanics, and non-Hispanic blacks and whites. For each subgroup, we estimated the value of 122 HRQoL outcomes on a quality-adjusted life year scale and tested for subgroup differences.

RESULTS

Compared with men, women preferred reduced lifespan over losses in HRQoL, particularly for depression. Compared with the younger adults, older adults preferred reduced lifespan over the symptoms of depression, anxiety, and fatigue. Compared with non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics preferred reduced lifespan over depression and sleep disturbance, but held similar values on losses in physical functioning. Among non-Hispanics, blacks preferred reduced lifespan over losses in ability to climb stairs and to fall asleep compared with whites, but held similar values on mental health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

With the growing emphasis on patient-centeredness and culturally sensitive treatment, it is important to recognize the diversity in values placed on potential losses in HRQoL, particularly mental health outcomes. Demographic differences in preferences may influence comparative or cost effectiveness of treatments as perceived by one or another subgroup.

摘要

背景

美国拥有文化和人口结构多样化的人群,本研究旨在研究不同性别、年龄、族裔和种族的健康偏好差异。

方法

我们评估了美国人群样本中由 PROMIS-29 调查定义的健康结果偏好。基于调查的 540 对权衡寿命和 7 个与健康相关的生活质量 (HRQoL) 领域的比较,我们比较了男性和女性、18-54 岁和 55 岁及以上的成年人、西班牙裔和非西班牙裔以及非西班牙裔黑人和白人之间的选择。对于每个亚组,我们根据质量调整生命年尺度估计了 122 个 HRQoL 结果的价值,并测试了亚组差异。

结果

与男性相比,女性更喜欢减少寿命而不是减少 HRQoL,特别是在抑郁方面。与年轻成年人相比,老年成年人更喜欢减少寿命而不是抑郁、焦虑和疲劳症状。与非西班牙裔白人相比,西班牙裔更喜欢减少寿命而不是抑郁和睡眠障碍,但在身体功能丧失方面的价值相似。在非西班牙裔人群中,与白人相比,黑人更喜欢减少寿命而不是失去爬楼梯和入睡的能力,但在心理健康结果方面的价值相似。

结论

随着对以患者为中心和文化敏感治疗的日益重视,认识到对潜在 HRQoL 丧失的价值的多样性(特别是心理健康结果)非常重要。偏好的人口统计学差异可能会影响一个或另一个亚组对治疗的比较或成本效益。

相似文献

1
Demographic differences in health preferences in the United States.美国健康偏好的人口统计学差异。
Med Care. 2014 Apr;52(4):307-13. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000066.
2
Sociodemographic predictors of pattern and volume of alcohol consumption across Hispanics, Blacks, and Whites: 10-year trend (1992-2002).社会人口统计学预测因素对西班牙裔、非裔和白人饮酒模式和饮酒量的影响:10 年趋势(1992-2002 年)。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 Oct;34(10):1782-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01265.x. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
3
Racial/ethnic differences in the association between symptoms of depression and self-rated mental health among older adults.老年人中抑郁症状与自评心理健康之间关联的种族/民族差异。
Community Ment Health J. 2014 Apr;50(3):325-30. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9642-2. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
4
The association of age, insomnia, and self-efficacy with continuous positive airway pressure adherence in black, white, and Hispanic U.S. Veterans.美国黑种人、白种人和西班牙裔退伍军人中年龄、失眠和自我效能与持续气道正压通气依从性的关系。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2013 Sep 15;9(9):885-95. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.2988.
5
Racial and ethnic differences in depressive subtypes and access to mental health care in the United States.美国不同种族和族裔在抑郁亚型和获得精神卫生保健方面的差异。
J Affect Disord. 2014 Feb;155:130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.037. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
6
Racial and ethnic disparities in postpartum depression care among low-income women.低收入女性产后抑郁症护理中的种族和民族差异。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Jun;62(6):619-25. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.6.pss6206_0619.
7
Diagnosis of depression and use of antidepressant pharmacotherapy among adults in the United States: does a disparity persist by ethnicity/race?美国成年人的抑郁症诊断和抗抑郁药药理学治疗的使用:种族/民族之间是否存在差异?
Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Feb 1;32(2):139-44. doi: 10.2165/11598950-000000000-00000.
8
Ethnic differences in drinking outcomes following a brief alcohol intervention in the trauma care setting.创伤护理环境中简短酒精干预后的饮酒结果的种族差异。
Addiction. 2010 Jan;105(1):62-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02737.x. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
9
Specifying race-ethnic differences in risk for psychiatric disorder in a USA national sample.在美国全国样本中明确精神疾病风险的种族-族裔差异。
Psychol Med. 2006 Jan;36(1):57-68. doi: 10.1017/S0033291705006161. Epub 2005 Oct 5.
10
Associations between self-rated mental health and psychiatric disorders among older adults: do racial/ethnic differences exist?老年人自评心理健康状况与精神障碍之间的关联:是否存在种族/民族差异?
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 May;19(5):416-22. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181f61ede.

引用本文的文献

1
The Monthly Cycling of Food Insecurity in Latinas at Risk for Diabetes: Methods, Retention, and Sample Characteristics for a Microlongitudinal Design.拉丁裔糖尿病高危女性粮食不安全状况的月度周期性变化:微纵向设计的方法、样本留存率及样本特征
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 28;9:e66970. doi: 10.2196/66970.
2
From simple to even simpler, but not too simple: a head-to-head comparison of the Better-Worse and Drop-Down methods for measuring patient health status.从简单到更简单,但不要过于简单:用于测量患者健康状况的 Better-Worse 法和 Drop-Down 法的头对头比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Dec 16;23(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02119-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29.使用患者报告结果测量信息系统29项简表(PROMIS-29)对健康结果进行的美国评估。
Value Health. 2014 Dec;17(8):846-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.005.
2
Standardization and regulatory guidelines may inhibit science and reduce the usefulness of analyses based on the application of preference-based measures for policy decisions.标准化和监管指南可能会抑制科学发展,并降低基于应用偏好性测量方法进行政策决策分析的有用性。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Apr;33(3):316-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12468793. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
3
A national study of racial differences in pain screening rates in the VA health care system.
Child health valuation protocol for a discrete choice experiment comparing paired comparison and kaizen tasks and estimating US EQ-5D-Y-3L values on an experience scale.
儿童健康评估方案,用于离散选择实验比较配对比较和改善任务,并在体验量表上估计美国 EQ-5D-Y-3L 值。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 24;13(10):e077256. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077256.
4
Recommendations from the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS: Patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures.ISPO 下肢 COMPASS 推荐:患者报告和基于表现的结局测量指标。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023 Feb 1;47(1):13-25. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000197. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
Do health preferences differ among Asian populations? A comparison of EQ-5D-5L discrete choice experiments data from 11 Asian studies.亚洲人群的健康偏好是否存在差异?来自 11 项亚洲研究的 EQ-5D-5L 离散选择实验数据的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Jul;31(7):2175-2187. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03075-x. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
6
Determinants of Health Preferences Using Data from the Egyptian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study.利用埃及 EQ-5D-5L 估值研究的数据确定健康偏好的决定因素。
Patient. 2022 Sep;15(5):589-598. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00572-0. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
7
Elicitation of Norwegian EQ-5D-5L values for hypothetical and experience-based health states based on the EuroQol Valuation Technology (EQ-VT) protocol.基于 EuroQol 估值技术(EQ-VT)协议,对假设和基于经验的健康状况进行挪威 EQ-5D-5L 值的 elicitation。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 11;10(6):e034683. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034683.
8
Using EQ-5D Data to Measure Hospital Performance: Are General Population Values Distorting Patients' Choices?利用 EQ-5D 数据衡量医院绩效:一般人群值是否扭曲了患者的选择?
Med Decis Making. 2020 May;40(4):511-521. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20927705. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
9
Assessing health-related quality of life in cancer survivors: factors impacting on EORTC QLU-C10D-derived utility values.评估癌症幸存者的健康相关生活质量:影响 EORTC QLQ-C10D 衍生效用值的因素。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jun;29(6):1483-1494. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02420-w. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
10
Use of PROMIS-29® in US Veterans: Diagnostic Concordance and Domain Comparisons with the General Population.PROMIS-29® 在美退伍军人中的使用:与普通人群的诊断一致性和领域比较。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1452-1458. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05011-9. Epub 2019 May 29.
一项针对退伍军人医疗保健系统中疼痛筛查率的种族差异的全国性研究。
Clin J Pain. 2013 Feb;29(2):118-23. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31826a86ae.
4
The effect of chronic conditions on stated preferences for health.慢性疾病对健康偏好的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Aug;14(4):697-702. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0421-8. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
5
Lead time TTO: leading to better health state valuations?等待时间 TTO:是否会导致更好的健康状态估值?
Health Econ. 2013 Apr;22(4):376-92. doi: 10.1002/hec.2804. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
6
Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values.运用离散选择实验来评估健康状态效用值。
J Health Econ. 2012 Jan;31(1):306-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
7
Revisiting United States valuation of EQ-5D states.重新审视美国对 EQ-5D 状态的评估。
J Health Econ. 2011 Sep;30(5):1057-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
8
Are patients' judgments of health status really different from the general population?患者对健康状况的判断真的与一般人群不同吗?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 May 11;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-31.
9
Thinking about it: thoughts about health and valuing QALYs.思考健康与重视 QALYs
Health Econ. 2011 Dec;20(12):1407-16. doi: 10.1002/hec.1679. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
10
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)开发并测试了其第一波成人自我报告健康结局项目库:2005-2008 年。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Aug 4.