Suppr超能文献

美国健康偏好的人口统计学差异。

Demographic differences in health preferences in the United States.

机构信息

*Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center and University of South Florida, Tampa, FL †Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC ‡Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL §Health Services, University of California, Los Angeles and RAND, Santa Monica, CA ∥Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL ¶Outcomes Research, Bethesda, MD.

出版信息

Med Care. 2014 Apr;52(4):307-13. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000066.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The United States has a culturally and demographically diverse populace, and the aim of this study was to examine differences in health preferences by sex, age, ethnicity, and race.

METHODS

We assessed preferences for health outcomes defined by the PROMIS-29 survey in a sample of the US population. On the basis of the survey's 540 paired-comparisons trading off lifespan and 7 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), we compared the choices between men and women, adults age 18-54 years and 55 years and older, Hispanics and non-Hispanics, and non-Hispanic blacks and whites. For each subgroup, we estimated the value of 122 HRQoL outcomes on a quality-adjusted life year scale and tested for subgroup differences.

RESULTS

Compared with men, women preferred reduced lifespan over losses in HRQoL, particularly for depression. Compared with the younger adults, older adults preferred reduced lifespan over the symptoms of depression, anxiety, and fatigue. Compared with non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics preferred reduced lifespan over depression and sleep disturbance, but held similar values on losses in physical functioning. Among non-Hispanics, blacks preferred reduced lifespan over losses in ability to climb stairs and to fall asleep compared with whites, but held similar values on mental health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

With the growing emphasis on patient-centeredness and culturally sensitive treatment, it is important to recognize the diversity in values placed on potential losses in HRQoL, particularly mental health outcomes. Demographic differences in preferences may influence comparative or cost effectiveness of treatments as perceived by one or another subgroup.

摘要

背景

美国拥有文化和人口结构多样化的人群,本研究旨在研究不同性别、年龄、族裔和种族的健康偏好差异。

方法

我们评估了美国人群样本中由 PROMIS-29 调查定义的健康结果偏好。基于调查的 540 对权衡寿命和 7 个与健康相关的生活质量 (HRQoL) 领域的比较,我们比较了男性和女性、18-54 岁和 55 岁及以上的成年人、西班牙裔和非西班牙裔以及非西班牙裔黑人和白人之间的选择。对于每个亚组,我们根据质量调整生命年尺度估计了 122 个 HRQoL 结果的价值,并测试了亚组差异。

结果

与男性相比,女性更喜欢减少寿命而不是减少 HRQoL,特别是在抑郁方面。与年轻成年人相比,老年成年人更喜欢减少寿命而不是抑郁、焦虑和疲劳症状。与非西班牙裔白人相比,西班牙裔更喜欢减少寿命而不是抑郁和睡眠障碍,但在身体功能丧失方面的价值相似。在非西班牙裔人群中,与白人相比,黑人更喜欢减少寿命而不是失去爬楼梯和入睡的能力,但在心理健康结果方面的价值相似。

结论

随着对以患者为中心和文化敏感治疗的日益重视,认识到对潜在 HRQoL 丧失的价值的多样性(特别是心理健康结果)非常重要。偏好的人口统计学差异可能会影响一个或另一个亚组对治疗的比较或成本效益。

相似文献

1
Demographic differences in health preferences in the United States.
Med Care. 2014 Apr;52(4):307-13. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000066.
2
Sociodemographic predictors of pattern and volume of alcohol consumption across Hispanics, Blacks, and Whites: 10-year trend (1992-2002).
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 Oct;34(10):1782-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01265.x. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
3
Racial/ethnic differences in the association between symptoms of depression and self-rated mental health among older adults.
Community Ment Health J. 2014 Apr;50(3):325-30. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9642-2. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
5
Racial and ethnic differences in depressive subtypes and access to mental health care in the United States.
J Affect Disord. 2014 Feb;155:130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.037. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
6
Racial and ethnic disparities in postpartum depression care among low-income women.
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Jun;62(6):619-25. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.6.pss6206_0619.
8
Ethnic differences in drinking outcomes following a brief alcohol intervention in the trauma care setting.
Addiction. 2010 Jan;105(1):62-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02737.x. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
9
Specifying race-ethnic differences in risk for psychiatric disorder in a USA national sample.
Psychol Med. 2006 Jan;36(1):57-68. doi: 10.1017/S0033291705006161. Epub 2005 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

4
Recommendations from the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS: Patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023 Feb 1;47(1):13-25. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000197. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
Do health preferences differ among Asian populations? A comparison of EQ-5D-5L discrete choice experiments data from 11 Asian studies.
Qual Life Res. 2022 Jul;31(7):2175-2187. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03075-x. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
6
Determinants of Health Preferences Using Data from the Egyptian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study.
Patient. 2022 Sep;15(5):589-598. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00572-0. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
8
Using EQ-5D Data to Measure Hospital Performance: Are General Population Values Distorting Patients' Choices?
Med Decis Making. 2020 May;40(4):511-521. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20927705. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
9
Assessing health-related quality of life in cancer survivors: factors impacting on EORTC QLU-C10D-derived utility values.
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jun;29(6):1483-1494. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02420-w. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
10
Use of PROMIS-29® in US Veterans: Diagnostic Concordance and Domain Comparisons with the General Population.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1452-1458. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05011-9. Epub 2019 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29.
Value Health. 2014 Dec;17(8):846-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.005.
3
A national study of racial differences in pain screening rates in the VA health care system.
Clin J Pain. 2013 Feb;29(2):118-23. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31826a86ae.
4
The effect of chronic conditions on stated preferences for health.
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Aug;14(4):697-702. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0421-8. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
5
Lead time TTO: leading to better health state valuations?
Health Econ. 2013 Apr;22(4):376-92. doi: 10.1002/hec.2804. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
6
Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values.
J Health Econ. 2012 Jan;31(1):306-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
7
Revisiting United States valuation of EQ-5D states.
J Health Econ. 2011 Sep;30(5):1057-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
8
Are patients' judgments of health status really different from the general population?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 May 11;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-31.
9
Thinking about it: thoughts about health and valuing QALYs.
Health Econ. 2011 Dec;20(12):1407-16. doi: 10.1002/hec.1679. Epub 2010 Oct 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验