Suppr超能文献

使用患者报告结果测量信息系统29项简表(PROMIS-29)对健康结果进行的美国评估。

US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29.

作者信息

Craig Benjamin M, Reeve Bryce B, Brown Paul M, Cella David, Hays Ron D, Lipscomb Joseph, Simon Pickard A, Revicki Dennis A

机构信息

Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center and University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Value Health. 2014 Dec;17(8):846-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.005.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Health valuation studies enhance economic evaluations of treatments by estimating the value of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) includes a 29-item short-form HRQOL measure, the PROMIS-29.

METHODS

To value PROMIS-29 responses on a quality-adjusted life-year scale, we conducted a national survey (N = 7557) using quota sampling based on the US 2010 Census. Based on 541 paired comparisons with over 350 responses each, pair-specific probabilities were incorporated into a weighted least-squared estimator.

RESULTS

All losses in HRQOL influenced choice; however, respondents valued losses in physical function, anxiety, depression, sleep, and pain more than those in fatigue and social functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

This article introduces a novel approach to valuing HRQOL for economic evaluations using paired comparisons and provides a tool to translate PROMIS-29 responses into quality-adjusted life-years.

摘要

目的

健康评估研究通过估计与健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL)的价值来加强对治疗的经济评估。患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)包括一项由29个项目组成的简短HRQOL测量指标,即PROMIS-29。

方法

为了在质量调整生命年量表上对PROMIS-29的回答进行估值,我们基于2010年美国人口普查采用配额抽样进行了一项全国性调查(N = 7557)。基于541对比较,每对比较有超过350个回答,将特定对的概率纳入加权最小二乘估计器。

结果

HRQOL的所有损失都会影响选择;然而,与疲劳和社会功能方面的损失相比,受访者更看重身体功能、焦虑、抑郁、睡眠和疼痛方面的损失。

结论

本文介绍了一种使用配对比较对HRQOL进行估值以用于经济评估的新方法,并提供了一种将PROMIS-29的回答转化为质量调整生命年的工具。

相似文献

1
US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29.
Value Health. 2014 Dec;17(8):846-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.005.
4
Estimating minimally important difference (MID) in PROMIS pediatric measures using the scale-judgment method.
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jan;25(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1058-8. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
7
Adapting summary scores for the PROMIS-29 v2.0 for use among older adults with multiple chronic conditions.
Qual Life Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):199-210. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1988-z. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
8
Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Lung. 2016 Apr;194(2):227-34. doi: 10.1007/s00408-016-9850-y. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
9
Quality of life and urolithiasis: the patient - reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS).
Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Sep-Oct;43(5):880-886. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0649.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain in systemic lupus erythematosus: emerging insights and paradigms.
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1038/s41584-025-01290-1.
3
Nonpharmacologic Back Pain Treatment Use and Associated Patient Reported Outcomes in US-Based Integrative Medicine Clinics.
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2025 Jun 2;14:27536130251345481. doi: 10.1177/27536130251345481. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Longitudinal validation of the PROMIS-16 in a sample of adults in the United States with back pain.
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jan;34(1):35-42. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03826-6. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
7
A randomized controlled study of auricular point acupressure to manage chemotherapy-induced neuropathy: Study protocol.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 26;19(9):e0311135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311135. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Demographic differences in health preferences in the United States.
Med Care. 2014 Apr;52(4):307-13. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000066.
2
Comparison of US panel vendors for online surveys.
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Nov 29;15(11):e260. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2903.
3
The effects of lead time and visual aids in TTO valuation: a study of the EQ-VT framework.
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Jul;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S15-24. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0504-1.
4
An Australian discrete choice experiment to value eq-5d health states.
Health Econ. 2014 Jun;23(6):729-42. doi: 10.1002/hec.2953. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
5
US valuation of the SF-6D.
Med Decis Making. 2013 Aug;33(6):793-803. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13482524. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
6
Promising insights into the health related quality of life for children with severe obesity.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Mar 1;11:29. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-29.
7
Universal health outcome measures for older persons with multiple chronic conditions.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Dec;60(12):2333-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04240.x. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
9
Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values.
J Health Econ. 2012 Jan;31(1):306-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验