Saracyn Marek, Brodowska-Kania Dorota, Niemczyk Stanisław
Department of Internal Diseases, Nephrology and Dialysis, Military Institute of Medicine, Szaserów Street 128, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Nov 27;2013:170576. doi: 10.1155/2013/170576.
Oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy in haemodialysis patients causes a great deal of controversy. This is because a number of pro- and anticoagulant factors play an important role in end-stage renal failure due to the nature of the disease itself. In these conditions, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the OACs used change as well. In the case of the treatment of venous thromboembolism, the only remaining option is OAC treatment according to regimens used for the general population. Prevention of HD vascular access thrombosis with the use of OACs is not very effective and can be dangerous. However, OAC treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation in dialysis population may be associated with an increase in the incidence of stroke and mortality. Doubts should be dispelled by prospective, randomised studies; at the moment, there is no justification for routine use of OACs in the above-mentioned indications. In selected cases of OAC therapy in this group of patients, it is absolutely necessary to control and monitor the applied treatment thoroughly. Indications for the use of OACs in patients with end-stage renal disease, including haemodialysis patients, should be currently limited.
血液透析患者使用口服抗凝剂(OAC)治疗引发了诸多争议。这是因为由于疾病本身的性质,多种促凝和抗凝因子在终末期肾衰竭中发挥着重要作用。在这些情况下,所使用的OAC的药代动力学和药效学特性也会发生变化。在治疗静脉血栓栓塞时,唯一剩下的选择是按照一般人群使用的方案进行OAC治疗。使用OAC预防血液透析血管通路血栓形成效果不佳且可能危险。然而,透析人群中房颤患者使用OAC治疗可能会增加中风发生率和死亡率。前瞻性随机研究应消除疑虑;目前,在上述适应症中常规使用OAC没有依据。在这组患者中选择进行OAC治疗的病例时,必须对所应用的治疗进行全面控制和监测。目前,终末期肾病患者(包括血液透析患者)使用OAC的适应症应受到限制。