Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona (ASPB), Plaça Lesseps 1, Barcelona 08023, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain; Doctorado en Biomedicina, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona (ASPB), Plaça Lesseps 1, Barcelona 08023, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Apr;65:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.015. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
There is no consensus on whether the risk of road traffic injury is higher among men or among women. Comparison between studies is difficult mainly due to the different exposure measures used to estimate the risk. The measures of exposure to the risk of road traffic injury should be people's mobility measures, but frequently authors use other measures such population or vehicles mobility. We compare road traffic injury risk in men and women, by age, mode of transport and severity, using the time people spend travelling as the exposure measure, in Catalonia for the period 2004-2008. This is a cross-sectional study including all residents aged over 3 years. The road traffic injury rate was calculated using the number of people injured, from the Register of Accidents and Victims of the National Traffic Authority as numerator, and the person-hours travelled, from the 2006 Daily Mobility Survey carried out by the Catalan regional government, as denominator. Sex and age specific rates by mode of transport and severity were calculated, and Poisson regression models were fitted. Among child pedestrians and young drivers, males present higher risk of slight and severe injury, and in the oldest groups women present higher risk. The death rate is always higher in men. There exists interaction between sex and age in road traffic injury risk. Therefore, injury risk is higher among men in some age groups, and among women in other groups, but these age groups vary depending on mode of transport and severity.
关于男性和女性谁面临更高的道路交通伤害风险,目前尚未达成共识。由于用于估计风险的暴露测量指标不同,因此对各研究进行比较是困难的。道路交通伤害风险的暴露测量指标应该是人们的流动性指标,但作者通常使用其他指标,如人口或车辆的流动性。我们使用旅行时间作为暴露测量指标,在 2004 年至 2008 年期间,比较了加泰罗尼亚地区不同年龄段、交通方式和严重程度的男性和女性的道路交通伤害风险。这是一项包括所有年龄在 3 岁以上的居民的横断面研究。道路交通伤害发生率是通过将国家交通管理局事故和受害者登记处记录的受伤人数作为分子,除以加泰罗尼亚地区政府于 2006 年进行的每日流动性调查中记录的出行人数作为分母计算得出的。按交通方式和严重程度计算了性别和年龄特定的发生率,并拟合了泊松回归模型。在儿童行人及年轻驾驶员中,男性发生轻微和严重伤害的风险更高,而在最年长的群体中,女性的风险更高。死亡率始终高于男性。道路交通伤害风险存在性别与年龄的交互作用。因此,在某些年龄组中,男性的伤害风险更高,而在其他组中,女性的伤害风险更高,但这些年龄组取决于交通方式和严重程度而有所不同。