Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France.
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Sep;58:35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.018. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
In France, the bicycle's modal share is stabilizing after a decline; in some of France's major cities, it has even increased since the 1990s. It is hence relevant to improve the knowledge of the injury risk associated with cycling, compared with other means of transport such as car, walking and powered two-wheeler (PTW) riding.
The injury incidence rates were estimated by the ratio between accident data and mobility (exposure) data. Two accident data sources were used: police data and hospital-based data (outpatients and inpatients) from the Rhône road trauma Registry. This provides four injury categories: all-injury, hospitalization, serious-injury and fatal-injury. Exposure data were estimated from a regional household travel survey (RTS), using three measures of mobility: number of trips, distance traveled and time spent traveling. The survey was carried out from November 2005 to April 2006, on weekdays, outside school and public holidays; this seasonality was corrected using the 2007-2008 national household travel survey (NTS) that covered an entire year. Only information involving accidents and trips in, and residents of, the Rhône County (1.6 million inhabitants, including the city Lyon) were included in our study. Trends of injury rates were also evaluated in Greater Lyon, using previous travel surveys.
The PTW riders had the highest all-injury, hospitalization, serious-injury and fatal-injury rates, followed by cyclists, and lastly by pedestrians and car occupants. The rates between men and women seemed similar among pedestrians and among car occupants. For car occupants, pedestrians and cyclists, the age group 18-25 years had higher all-injury rate compared with the age group 25-65 years. On the contrary, the age group≥65 years seemed to have higher hospitalization and serious-injury rates, compared with the age group 25-65 years. For cyclists, the injury rates seemed higher in non-dense areas than in dense areas. Between 1996-1997 and 2005-2006 and with regards to time spent traveling, the all-injury, serious-injury and fatal-injury rates seemed to have decreased for car occupants and cyclists.
The higher risk for PTW riders is confirmed and quantified; it is very high. Decrease in injury rates seems more marked for cyclists; this may indicate the "safety in numbers" effect. Countermeasures for improving road safety could be implemented, especially for vulnerable road user types. However, they will not be sufficient to fill in the gap between the much higher risk for PTW riders and that of car occupants. Exposure-based injury rates can be a tool for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of policies and programs, and for comparisons between countries.
在法国,自行车的出行分担率在下降后趋于稳定;在法国的一些主要城市,自 20 世纪 90 年代以来甚至有所上升。因此,与汽车、步行和两轮助力车(PTW)骑行等其他交通方式相比,有必要提高对与骑自行车相关的伤害风险的认识。
通过事故数据与出行(暴露)数据的比率来估算伤害发生率。使用了两种事故数据源:警方数据和罗纳路创伤登记处的医院数据(门诊和住院患者)。这提供了四个伤害类别:全伤、住院、重伤和致命伤。使用区域家庭出行调查(RTS)中的出行数据来估算暴露数据,使用出行次数、出行距离和出行时间三个指标来衡量出行。该调查于 2005 年 11 月至 2006 年 4 月在工作日、校外和公共假日进行;通过 2007-2008 年涵盖全年的全国家庭出行调查(NTS)对季节性进行了校正。我们的研究仅包括罗纳县(160 万居民,包括里昂市)的事故和出行信息,以及居民。还使用以前的出行调查评估了大里昂地区的伤害发生率趋势。
在全伤、住院、重伤和致命伤方面,PTW 骑手的发生率最高,其次是骑自行车的人,步行者和汽车乘客的发生率最低。在步行者和汽车乘客中,男女之间的发生率似乎相似。对于汽车乘客、行人、骑自行车者,18-25 岁年龄组的全伤发生率高于 25-65 岁年龄组。相反,≥65 岁年龄组的住院和重伤发生率似乎高于 25-65 岁年龄组。对于骑自行车的人,非密集区的伤害发生率似乎高于密集区。与 1996-1997 年和 2005-2006 年相比,随着出行时间的增加,汽车乘客和骑自行车者的全伤、重伤和致命伤发生率似乎有所下降。
PTW 骑手的更高风险得到了确认和量化;风险非常高。伤害发生率的下降似乎更为明显的是骑自行车的人;这可能表明了“数量安全”效应。可以实施改善道路安全的措施,特别是针对弱势道路使用者类型。然而,这些措施不足以弥补 PTW 骑手和汽车乘客之间风险差距。基于暴露的伤害发生率可以作为监测和评估政策和计划有效性的工具,也可以作为国家之间的比较。