Departments of *Orthopaedic Surgery †Radiology ‡Medicine §Psychiatry, and ¶Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA ‖Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Administration Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA; and **Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Mar 15;39(6):469-75. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000181.
Cross sectional study.
The goal of this study is to identify relationships between objectively measured and subjectively scored parameters and reported pain.
Studies have demonstrated the unreliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based parameters to identify pathological pain generators of chronic low back pain, but they were based on visual inspection and subjective assessment of lumbar disc features. Advancements in computer image analysis provide objective measurements of lumbar disc features.
Two radiologists evaluated 39 axial and sagittal T1- and T2-weighted MR images of patients with chronic axial low back pain (age, >65 yr) and graded 4 subjective lumbar disc parameters (T2 signal intensity, nucleus shape, Modic changes, and osteophyte formation) whose sum is the cumulative MRI score. Objective parameter, MRI index, was calculated as the product of the measured lumbar disc area and total disc MRI signal intensity. Discs were sorted from least to the most degenerated relative to each parameter. Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression analysis were performed between the reported pain score and each parameter.
The most and least degenerated discs in each patient, as assessed by MRI index, had the highest negative and positive correlation coefficient and regression weight contribution, respectively. All subjective parameters had low correlation coefficients and regression goodness of fit.
Although limited by small sample size, the objective parameter, MRI index, can be a potential imaging biomarker used to identify possible pain generators. This study presents a potential new application of MR imaging in identifying pain generators of patients with chronic low back pain.
横断面研究。
本研究的目的是确定客观测量和主观评分参数与报告疼痛之间的关系。
研究表明,磁共振成像(MRI)为基础的参数无法可靠识别慢性下腰痛的病理性疼痛发生器,但这些研究基于对腰椎间盘特征的视觉检查和主观评估。计算机图像分析的进步为腰椎间盘特征提供了客观的测量方法。
两位放射科医生评估了 39 例患有慢性轴向下腰痛(年龄>65 岁)的轴向和矢状 T1 和 T2 加权 MRI 图像,并对 4 个主观腰椎间盘参数(T2 信号强度、核形状、Modic 改变和骨赘形成)进行了评分,这些参数的总和为累积 MRI 评分。客观参数 MRI 指数被计算为测量的腰椎间盘面积和总椎间盘 MRI 信号强度的乘积。根据每个参数对椎间盘进行从最退变到最未退变的排序。对报告的疼痛评分与每个参数进行 Pearson 相关系数和多元线性回归分析。
根据 MRI 指数评估,每个患者最退变和最未退变的椎间盘与报告的疼痛评分具有最高的负相关系数和回归权重贡献。所有主观参数的相关系数和回归拟合优度都较低。
尽管受到样本量小的限制,但客观参数 MRI 指数可以作为一种潜在的成像生物标志物,用于识别可能的疼痛发生器。本研究提出了一种在慢性下腰痛患者中识别疼痛发生器的潜在新的磁共振成像应用。