Scott Alan C, Atkins Katherine N, Bentzen Billie Louise, Barlow Janet M
Assistant Professor of Psychology, Elon University, 2337 Campus Box, Elon, NC 27244-2010, .
Research Assistant - Elon University, 3248 Campus Box, Elon NC 27244-2010.
Transp Res Rec. 2012;2299(2012). doi: 10.3141/2299-07.
This study evaluates the usability of pedestrian signals by persons with varying visual acuities under different conditions of symbol size, crossing length and type of background behind the pedestrian signal. While viewing photographs presented on a computer monitor under unimpaired viewing conditions (approx. 20/20 visual acuity) and under simulated visual impairment (approx. acuities of 20/100 and 20/300), participants attempted to determine the pedestrian phase (Walk or Don't Walk) and to report the number presented by the countdown timer display. Performance on the phase discrimination task by those with simulated 20/300 acuity and with 9 and 12 in. high symbols often resulted in performance which was little better than chance despite a highly controlled environment (i.e., no moving vehicles or environmental distractions) and signals which were subjectively in excellent working condition and of high visibility (i.e., good luminance/contrast, no glare). Reading the countdown display was essentially impossible. Participants with simulated 20/100 acuity were rather successful with regards to phase identification - averaging better than 87% correct under all stimulus conditions - but room for improvement exists as compared to performance in the 20/20 condition. Reading the countdown display was difficult for participants with simulated 20/100 acuity - averaging between 6.5% and 58.5% correct under the various stimulus conditions. The effect of different backgrounds on the usability of the signals, as well as the implications of the findings with regards to signal size and crossing length on the current signals standards, are discussed.
本研究评估了不同视力的人群在行人信号灯符号大小、过街长度以及行人信号背后背景类型的不同条件下对行人信号灯的可用性。在正常视力条件下(约20/20视力)以及模拟视力受损条件下(约20/100和20/300视力)观看电脑显示器上呈现的照片时,参与者试图确定行人通行阶段(行走或禁止通行)并报告倒计时器显示的数字。对于模拟视力为20/300的参与者以及符号高度为9英寸和12英寸的情况,尽管环境高度受控(即没有行驶车辆或环境干扰)且信号灯主观上工作状态良好且能见度高(即亮度/对比度良好,无眩光),但在相位辨别任务中的表现往往仅略好于随机水平。读取倒计时显示基本上是不可能的。模拟视力为20/100的参与者在相位识别方面相当成功——在所有刺激条件下平均正确率超过87%——但与20/20视力条件下的表现相比仍有改进空间。对于模拟视力为20/100的参与者来说,读取倒计时显示很困难——在各种刺激条件下平均正确率在6.5%至58.5%之间。讨论了不同背景对信号灯可用性的影响,以及研究结果对于当前信号灯标准中信号大小和过街长度的启示。