Suppr超能文献

中心视力丧失的人观看视频有困难。

People With Central Vision Loss Have Difficulty Watching Videos.

机构信息

Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Jan 2;60(1):358-364. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25540.

Abstract

PURPOSE

People with central vision loss (CVL) often report difficulties watching video. We objectively evaluated the ability to follow the story (using the information acquisition method).

METHODS

Subjects with CVL (n = 23) or normal vision (NV, n = 60) described the content of 30-second video clips from movies and documentaries. We derived an objective information acquisition (IA) score for each response using natural-language processing. To test whether the impact of CVL was simply due to reduced resolution, another group of NV subjects (n = 15) described video clips with defocus blur that reduced visual acuity to 20/50 to 20/800. Mixed models included random effects correcting for differences between subjects and between the clips, with age, gender, cognitive status, and education as covariates.

RESULTS

Compared to both NV groups, IA scores were worse for the CVL group (P < 0.001). IA reduced with worsening visual acuity (P < 0.001), and the reduction with worsening visual acuity was greater for the CVL group than the NV-defocus group (P = 0.01), which was seen as a greater discrepancy at worse levels of visual acuity.

CONCLUSIONS

The IA method was able to detect difficulties in following the story experienced by people with CVL. Defocus blur failed to recreate the CVL experience. IA is likely to be useful for evaluations of the effects of vision rehabilitation.

摘要

目的

患有中央视力丧失(CVL)的人经常报告观看视频有困难。我们客观地评估了(使用信息获取方法)跟随故事的能力。

方法

CVL 受试者(n = 23)或正常视力(NV,n = 60)描述了电影和纪录片中 30 秒视频剪辑的内容。我们使用自然语言处理为每个响应得出了一个客观的信息获取(IA)分数。为了测试 CVL 的影响是否仅仅是由于分辨率降低,另一组 NV 受试者(n = 15)描述了具有散焦模糊的视频剪辑,该模糊将视力降低至 20/50 至 20/800。混合模型包括随机效应,可纠正受试者之间和剪辑之间的差异,年龄、性别、认知状态和教育程度作为协变量。

结果

与 NV 两组相比,CVL 组的 IA 评分更差(P < 0.001)。IA 随视觉敏锐度的下降而降低(P < 0.001),CVL 组与 NV 散焦组相比,视觉敏锐度下降的降低幅度更大(P = 0.01),这表明在较低的视觉敏锐度水平下差异更大。

结论

IA 方法能够检测到 CVL 患者在跟随故事时遇到的困难。散焦模糊未能重现 CVL 体验。IA 可能对评估视力康复效果有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e81/6354940/567325c6401f/i1552-5783-60-1-358-f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验