University of California, Berkeley.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 May;26(5):1141-53. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00556. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
The predominant neurobiological model of working memory (WM) posits that stimulus information is stored via stable, elevated activity within highly selective neurons. On the basis of this model, which we refer to as the canonical model, the storage of stimulus information is largely associated with lateral PFC (lPFC). A growing number of studies describe results that cannot be fully explained by the canonical model, suggesting that it is in need of revision. In this study, we directly tested key elements of the canonical model. We analyzed fMRI data collected as participants performed a task requiring WM for faces and scenes. Multivariate decoding procedures identified patterns of activity containing information about the items maintained in WM (faces, scenes, or both). Although information about WM items was identified in extrastriate visual cortex (EC) and lPFC, only EC exhibited a pattern of results consistent with a sensory representation. Information in both regions persisted even in the absence of elevated activity, suggesting that elevated population activity may not represent the storage of information in WM. Additionally, we observed that WM information was distributed across EC neural populations that exhibited a broad range of selectivity for the WM items rather than restricted to highly selective EC populations. Finally, we determined that activity patterns coding for WM information were not stable, but instead varied over the course of a trial, indicating that the neural code for WM information is dynamic rather than static. Together, these findings challenge the canonical model of WM.
工作记忆(WM)的主要神经生物学模型假设,刺激信息通过高度选择性神经元的稳定、升高的活动来存储。基于这个我们称之为经典模型的模型,刺激信息的存储主要与外侧前额叶皮层(lPFC)有关。越来越多的研究描述了不能完全用经典模型解释的结果,表明它需要修订。在这项研究中,我们直接测试了经典模型的关键要素。我们分析了参与者在执行需要对人脸和场景进行 WM 的任务时收集的 fMRI 数据。多元解码程序识别出包含 WM 中保留的项目(人脸、场景或两者)信息的活动模式。尽管在枕叶外皮层(EC)和 lPFC 中识别出了关于 WM 项目的信息,但只有 EC 表现出与感觉表示一致的结果模式。即使在没有升高的活动的情况下,两个区域的信息都持续存在,这表明升高的群体活动可能不代表 WM 中信息的存储。此外,我们观察到 WM 信息分布在 EC 神经元群体中,这些群体对 WM 项目表现出广泛的选择性,而不是仅限于高度选择性的 EC 群体。最后,我们确定编码 WM 信息的活动模式不稳定,而是在试验过程中变化,这表明 WM 信息的神经编码是动态的而不是静态的。总的来说,这些发现挑战了 WM 的经典模型。