• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移民父母子女的广泛性发育障碍:不同评估工具的比较

Pervasive developmental disorder in the children of immigrant parents: comparison of different assessment instruments.

作者信息

Pondé Milena Pereira, Rousseau Cécile, Carlos Marco Antônio Costa

机构信息

Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Interdisciplinary Laboratory in Autism Research, Brazil, SalvadorBA.

Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University, Canada, Montreal.

出版信息

Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2013 Nov;71(11):877-82. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20130091.

DOI:10.1590/0004-282X20130091
PMID:24394875
Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe how the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) behaves in relation to the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) and to clinical diagnosis based on the criteria defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4 th Edition (DSM-IV) for children of immigrant parents. Forty-nine children of parents who had immigrated to Canada were evaluated. In this sample, the ADOS and the DSM-IV showed complete agreement. Using the standard cut-off point of 30, the CARS showed high specificity and poor sensitivity. The study proposes a cut-off point for the CARS that would include pervasive developmental disorder - not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS). Reducing the cut-off point to 20/21 increased the specificity of the instrument for this group of children without significantly reducing its sensitivity.

摘要

本研究的目的是描述儿童自闭症评定量表(CARS)相对于自闭症诊断观察量表(ADOS)的表现,以及基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)为移民父母的子女定义的标准进行临床诊断时的表现。对49名父母已移民到加拿大的儿童进行了评估。在这个样本中,ADOS和DSM-IV显示出完全一致。使用30的标准分界点时,CARS显示出高特异性和低敏感性。该研究提出了一个CARS的分界点,该分界点将包括未另行指定的广泛性发育障碍(PDD-NOS)。将分界点降低到20/21可提高该工具对这组儿童的特异性,而不会显著降低其敏感性。

相似文献

1
Pervasive developmental disorder in the children of immigrant parents: comparison of different assessment instruments.移民父母子女的广泛性发育障碍:不同评估工具的比较
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2013 Nov;71(11):877-82. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20130091.
2
Modeling clinical outcome of children with autistic spectrum disorders.对自闭症谱系障碍儿童的临床结果进行建模。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jul;116(1):117-22. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1118.
3
Childhood autism rating scale--Tokyo version for screening pervasive developmental disorders.儿童孤独症评定量表——东京版,用于筛查广泛性发育障碍。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003 Feb;57(1):113-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2003.01087.x.
4
[Clinical usefulness of IDEA and CARS: concordance with DSM-IV-TR in children and adolescents with suspicion of PDD].[婴儿孤独症评定量表(IDEA)和儿童孤独症评定量表(CARS)的临床实用性:与疑似广泛性发育障碍(PDD)的儿童和青少年的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)的一致性]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2014 Feb;80(2):71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
5
Diagnostic rules for children with PDD-NOS and multiple complex developmental disorder.未特定型广泛性发育障碍及多重复杂发育障碍儿童的诊断规则。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1998 Sep;39(6):911-9.
6
A Comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Diagnostic Classifications in the Clinical Diagnosis of Autistic Spectrum Disorder.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)与第五版(DSM-5)自闭症谱系障碍临床诊断分类比较
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Jan;47(1):101-109. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2937-8.
7
Reliability and accuracy of differentiating pervasive developmental disorder subtypes.区分广泛性发育障碍亚型的可靠性和准确性。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;37(3):278-85. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199803000-00012.
8
Sleep disturbance and its relation to DSM-IV psychiatric symptoms in preschool-age children with pervasive developmental disorder and community controls.广泛性发育障碍学龄前儿童及社区对照儿童的睡眠障碍及其与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)精神症状的关系。
J Child Neurol. 2007 Feb;22(2):161-9. doi: 10.1177/0883073807300310.
9
Sensitivity and specificity of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers and the Social Communication Questionnaire in preschoolers suspected of having pervasive developmental disorders.《幼儿自闭症改良检查表》及《社交沟通问卷》对疑似广泛性发育障碍学龄前儿童的敏感性和特异性。
Autism. 2008 Nov;12(6):627-44. doi: 10.1177/1362361308097116.
10
Pervasive developmental disorders in individuals with cerebral palsy.脑瘫患者的广泛性发育障碍
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Apr;51(4):289-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03171.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcranial direct current stimulation to facilitate neurofunctional rehabilitation in children with autism spectrum disorder: a protocol for a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.经颅直流电刺激促进自闭症谱系障碍儿童的神经功能康复:一项随机、假刺激对照、双盲临床试验方案
Front Neurol. 2023 Jun 15;14:1196585. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1196585. eCollection 2023.
2
A Validation Study of the CARS-2 Compared With the ADOS-2 in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Suggestion for Cutoff Scores.与自闭症诊断观察量表第二版(ADOS-2)相比,儿童孤独症评定量表第二版(CARS-2)在自闭症谱系障碍诊断中的效度研究:关于临界分数的建议。
J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 1;34(1):45-50. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.220027.
3
A validation study of the LABIRINTO scale for the evaluation of autism spectrum disorder in children aged 2 to 4 years.
LABIRINTO 量表评估 2 至 4 岁儿童自闭症谱系障碍的验证研究。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2021 Oct-Dec;43(4):320-328. doi: 10.47626/2237-6089-2020-0141. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
4
Explaining Age at Autism Spectrum Diagnosis in Children with Migrant and Non-Migrant Background in Austria.奥地利有移民背景和无移民背景儿童的自闭症谱系障碍诊断年龄解析
Brain Sci. 2020 Jul 14;10(7):448. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10070448.
5
Comparison of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and Childhood Autism Rating Scale in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Preliminary Study.《自闭症诊断观察量表与儿童自闭症评定量表在自闭症谱系障碍诊断中的比较:一项初步研究》
Soa Chongsonyon Chongsin Uihak. 2018 Oct 1;29(4):172-177. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.180015.