Bultman Eric M, Brodsky Ethan K, Horng Debra E, Irarrazaval Pablo, Schelman William R, Block Walter F, Reeder Scott B
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Apr;39(4):853-65. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24238. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
To develop and demonstrate the feasibility of a new formulation for quantitative perfusion modeling in the liver using interrupted DCE-MRI data acquired during multiple sequential breathholds.
A new mathematical formulation to estimate quantitative perfusion parameters using interrupted data was developed. Using this method, we investigated whether a second degree-of-freedom in the tissue residue function (TRF) improves quality-of-fit criteria when applied to a dual-input single-compartment perfusion model. We subsequently estimated hepatic perfusion parameters using DCE-MRI data from 12 healthy volunteers and 9 cirrhotic patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); and examined the utility of these estimates in differentiating between healthy liver, cirrhotic liver, and HCC.
Quality-of-fit criteria in all groups were improved using a Weibull TRF (2 degrees-of-freedom) versus an exponential TRF (1 degree-of-freedom), indicating nearer concordance of source DCE-MRI data with the Weibull model. Using the Weibull TRF, arterial fraction was greater in cirrhotic versus normal liver (39 ± 23% versus 15 ± 14%, P = 0.07). Mean transit time (20.6 ± 4.1 s versus 9.8 ± 3.5 s, P = 0.01) and arterial fraction (39 ± 23% versus 73 ± 14%, P = 0.04) were both significantly different between cirrhotic liver and HCC, while differences in total perfusion approached significance.
This work demonstrates the feasibility of estimating hepatic perfusion parameters using interrupted data acquired during sequential breathholds.
开发并证明一种新的配方用于肝脏定量灌注建模的可行性,该配方使用在多次连续屏气期间采集的间断动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)数据。
开发了一种使用间断数据估计定量灌注参数的新数学公式。使用该方法,我们研究了在应用于双输入单室灌注模型时,组织残留函数(TRF)中的第二个自由度是否能改善拟合优度标准。随后,我们使用来自12名健康志愿者和9名有肝细胞癌(HCC)病史的肝硬化患者的DCE-MRI数据估计肝脏灌注参数;并检验了这些估计值在区分健康肝脏、肝硬化肝脏和HCC方面的效用。
与指数TRF(1个自由度)相比,使用威布尔TRF(2个自由度)可改善所有组的拟合优度标准,表明源DCE-MRI数据与威布尔模型的一致性更高。使用威布尔TRF时,肝硬化肝脏的动脉分数高于正常肝脏(39±23%对15±14%,P = 0.07)。肝硬化肝脏与HCC之间的平均通过时间(20.6±4.1秒对9.8±3.5秒,P = 0.01)和动脉分数(39±