• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Correction of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver.肝脏动态对比增强 MRI 中的动脉输入函数校正。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Aug;36(2):411-21. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23636. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
2
Improved hepatic arterial fraction estimation using cardiac output correction of arterial input functions for liver DCE MRI.使用肝脏动态对比增强磁共振成像动脉输入函数的心输出量校正来改进肝动脉分数估计。
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Feb 21;62(4):1533-1546. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa553c. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
3
Improved reliability of perfusion estimation in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by using the arterial input function from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.通过使用动态对比增强 MRI 的动脉输入函数,提高动态磁化率对比 MRI 中灌注估计的可靠性。
NMR Biomed. 2024 Jan;37(1):e5038. doi: 10.1002/nbm.5038. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
4
Arterial input functions (AIFs) measured directly from arteries with low and standard doses of contrast agent, and AIFs derived from reference tissues.用低剂量和标准剂量造影剂直接从动脉测量的动脉输入函数(AIFs),以及从参考组织得出的AIFs。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb;34(2):197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.10.025. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
5
Automated detection of the arterial input function using normalized cut clustering to determine cerebral perfusion by dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging.利用归一化割聚类自动检测动脉输入函数,通过动态磁敏感对比磁共振成像确定脑灌注。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Apr;41(4):1071-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24642. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
6
Precision, signal-to-noise ratio, and dose optimization of magnitude and phase arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.动态对比增强磁共振成像中幅度和相位动脉输入函数的精度、信噪比及剂量优化
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Mar;25(3):598-611. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20859.
7
Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.使用动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)评估早期临床试验中的可重复性和治疗反应:使用磁共振成像(MR)和计算机断层扫描(CT)衍生的动脉输入函数进行参数分析的比较
Eur Radiol. 2016 Jul;26(7):1991-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4012-9. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
8
Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.志愿者研究中通过肾脏动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)得出的主动脉输入函数(AIF)的可重复性。
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):576-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.025. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
9
Automatic individual arterial input functions calculated from PCA outperform manual and population-averaged approaches for the pharmacokinetic modeling of DCE-MR images.从主成分分析计算得出的自动个体动脉输入函数在DCE-MR图像的药代动力学建模方面优于手动和群体平均方法。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Aug;42(2):477-87. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24805. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
10
Quantitative hepatic perfusion modeling using DCE-MRI with sequential breathholds.使用DCE-MRI并采用连续屏气进行肝脏定量灌注建模。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Apr;39(4):853-65. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24238. Epub 2013 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A simplified method to correct saturation of arterial input function for cardiac magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion imaging: validation with simultaneously acquired PET.一种校正心脏磁共振首过灌注成像动脉输入函数饱和度的简化方法:同时采集 PET 的验证。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023 Jun 22;25(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00945-w.
2
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.使用高时空分辨率 Golden-angle RAdial 稀疏并行 MRI 和迭代联合估计动脉输入函数和药代动力学参数的动态对比增强 MRI 参数图。
NMR Biomed. 2022 Jul;35(7):e4718. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4718. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
3
Multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) for treatment response assessment of radiation therapy.多参数 MRI(mpMRI)在放射治疗反应评估中的应用。
Med Phys. 2022 Apr;49(4):2794-2819. doi: 10.1002/mp.15130. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
4
Topics on quantitative liver magnetic resonance imaging.定量肝脏磁共振成像主题
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019 Nov;9(11):1840-1890. doi: 10.21037/qims.2019.09.18.
5
3D nonrigid motion correction for quantitative assessment of hepatic lesions in DCE-MRI.三维非刚性运动校正用于 DCE-MRI 中肝脏病变的定量评估。
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Nov;82(5):1753-1766. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27867. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
6
Quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA) recommendations for improved precision of DWI and DCE-MRI derived biomarkers in multicenter oncology trials.定量成像生物标志物联盟(QIBA)关于提高多中心肿瘤试验中 DWI 和 DCE-MRI 衍生生物标志物精度的建议。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jun;49(7):e101-e121. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26518. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
7
Multiparametric FDG-PET/MRI of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Initial Experience.多参数 FDG-PET/MRI 对肝细胞癌的诊断:初步经验。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2018 Oct 3;2018:5638283. doi: 10.1155/2018/5638283. eCollection 2018.
8
Simultaneous characterization of tumor cellularity and the Warburg effect with PET, MRI and hyperpolarized C-MRSI.用 PET、MRI 和 ¹³C 磁共振波谱成像技术对肿瘤细胞密度和瓦博格效应进行同步特征描述。
Theranostics. 2018 Sep 9;8(17):4765-4780. doi: 10.7150/thno.25162. eCollection 2018.
9
Comparison of arterial input functions measured from ultra-fast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography in prostate cancer patients.超快速动态对比增强 MRI 与动态对比增强 CT 在前列腺癌患者中的动脉输入函数测量比较。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Jan 30;63(3):03NT01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa51b.
10
Vascular input function correction of inflow enhancement for improved pharmacokinetic modeling of liver DCE-MRI.血管内输入功能校正流入增强以改善肝脏 DCE-MRI 的药代动力学建模。
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Jun;79(6):3093-3102. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26988. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Phase-based arterial input function measurements in the femoral arteries for quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and comparison with DCE-CT.基于相位的股动脉动脉输入功能测量用于动态对比增强(DCE)MRI 的定量分析,并与 DCE-CT 进行比较。
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Nov;66(5):1267-74. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22905. Epub 2011 May 20.
2
Arterial input functions determined from MR signal magnitude and phase for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the human pelvis.基于 MR 信号幅度和相位的动脉输入函数在人体骨盆定量动态对比增强 MRI 中的应用。
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Aug;66(2):498-504. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22856. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
3
A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.一种用于动态对比增强 MRI 中盲动脉输入函数估计的模型约束蒙特卡罗方法:二、体内结果。
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Aug 21;55(16):4807-23. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/012. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
4
The use of a reference tissue arterial input function with low-temporal-resolution DCE-MRI data.使用低时间分辨率 DCE-MRI 数据的参考组织动脉输入函数。
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Aug 21;55(16):4871-83. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/016. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
5
A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.模型约束的蒙特卡罗方法用于动态对比增强 MRI 中的盲动脉输入函数估计:I. 模拟。
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Aug 21;55(16):4783-806. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/011. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
6
Use of a reference tissue and blood vessel to measure the arterial input function in DCEMRI.使用参考组织和血管测量 DCEMRI 的动脉输入函数。
Magn Reson Med. 2010 Dec;64(6):1821-6. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22551.
7
Phase-based arterial input function measurements for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.基于时相的动态磁敏感对比 MRI 动脉输入函数测量。
Magn Reson Med. 2010 Aug;64(2):358-68. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22420.
8
Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging of the liver.肝脏灌注磁共振成像。
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr 7;16(13):1598-609. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i13.1598.
9
Comparison between population average and experimentally measured arterial input function in predicting biopsy results in prostate cancer.比较群体平均与实验测量的动脉输入函数在预测前列腺癌活检结果中的应用。
Acad Radiol. 2010 Apr;17(4):520-5. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.11.006. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
10
Average arterial input function for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of neck nodal metastases.颈部淋巴结转移定量动态对比增强磁共振成像的平均动脉输入函数
BMC Med Phys. 2009 Apr 7;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1756-6649-9-4.

肝脏动态对比增强 MRI 中的动脉输入函数校正。

Correction of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Aug;36(2):411-21. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23636. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1002/jmri.23636
PMID:22392876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3371299/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop a postprocessing method to correct saturation of arterial input function (AIF) in T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for quantification of hepatic perfusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The saturated AIF is corrected by parameterizing the first pass of the AIF as a smooth function with a single peak and minimizing a least-squares error in fitting the liver DCE-MRI data to a dual-input single-compartment model. Sensitivities of the method to the degree of saturation in the AIF first-pass peak and the image contrast-to-noise ratio were assessed. The method was also evaluated by correlating portal venous perfusion with an independent overall liver function measurement.

RESULTS

The proposed method corrects the distorted AIF with a saturation ratio up to 0.45. The corrected AIF improved hepatic arterial perfusion by -23.4% and portal venous perfusion by 26.9% in a study of 12 patients with liver cancers. The correlation between the mean voxelwise portal venous perfusion and overall liver function measurement was improved by using the corrected AIFs (R(2) = 0.67) compared with the saturated AIFs (R(2) = 0.39).

CONCLUSION

The method is robust for correcting AIF distortion and has the potential to improve quantification of hepatic perfusion for assessment of liver tissue response to treatment in patients with hepatic cancers.

摘要

目的

开发一种后处理方法,以纠正 T1 加权动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)中动脉输入函数(AIF)的饱和度,从而对肝灌注进行定量分析。

材料与方法

通过将 AIF 的初次通过参数化为具有单个峰值的平滑函数,并最小化拟合肝脏 DCE-MRI 数据到双输入单室模型的最小二乘误差,来校正饱和的 AIF。评估了该方法对 AIF 初次通过峰值的饱和度和图像对比噪声比的灵敏度。还通过将门静脉灌注与独立的整体肝功能测量相关联来评估该方法。

结果

该方法可校正饱和度高达 0.45 的失真 AIF。在对 12 例肝癌患者的研究中,校正后的 AIF 使肝动脉灌注降低了-23.4%,门静脉灌注增加了 26.9%。与使用饱和 AIF(R(2) = 0.39)相比,使用校正后的 AIF 可改善平均体素门静脉灌注与整体肝功能测量之间的相关性(R(2) = 0.67)。

结论

该方法对于校正 AIF 失真非常有效,有望提高肝癌患者治疗后肝组织反应评估中的肝灌注定量分析的准确性。