*The Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Boston, MA; †Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2014 Jan;35(1):18-27. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000009.
To evaluate the efficacy of 2 computer attention training systems administered in school for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Children in second and fourth grade with a diagnosis of ADHD (n = 104) were randomly assigned to neurofeedback (NF) (n = 34), cognitive training (CT) (n = 34), or control (n = 36) conditions. A 2-point growth model assessed change from pre-post intervention on parent reports (Conners 3-Parent [Conners 3-P]; Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function [BRIEF] rating scale), teacher reports (Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn and Pelham scale [SKAMP]; Conners 3-Teacher [Conners 3-T]), and systematic classroom observations (Behavioral Observation of Students in Schools [BOSS]). Paired t tests and an analysis of covariance assessed change in medication.
Children who received NF showed significant improvement compared with those in the control condition on the Conners 3-P Attention, Executive Functioning and Global Index, on all BRIEF summary indices, and on BOSS motor/verbal off-task behavior. Children who received CT showed no improvement compared to the control condition. Children in the NF condition showed significant improvements compared to those in the CT condition on Conners 3-P Executive Functioning, all BRIEF summary indices, SKAMP Attention, and Conners 3-T Inattention subscales. Stimulant medication dosage in methylphenidate equivalencies significantly increased for children in the CT (8.54 mg) and control (7.05 mg) conditions but not for those in the NF condition (0.29 mg).
Neurofeedback made greater improvements in ADHD symptoms compared to both the control and CT conditions. Thus, NF is a promising attention training treatment intervention for children with ADHD.
评估 2 种在学校中用于治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童的计算机注意力训练系统的疗效。
随机将 104 名被诊断为 ADHD 的二、四年级儿童分配到神经反馈(NF)(n = 34)、认知训练(CT)(n = 34)或对照组(n = 36)。采用 2 点增长模型评估从干预前到干预后的父母报告(Conners 3-Parent [Conners 3-P];执行功能行为评定量表 [BRIEF]评定量表)、教师报告(Swanson、Kotkin、Agler、M-Flynn 和 Pelham 量表 [SKAMP];Conners 3-教师 [Conners 3-T])和系统课堂观察(学生在学校的行为观察 [BOSS])上的变化。配对 t 检验和协方差分析评估药物治疗的变化。
与对照组相比,接受 NF 治疗的儿童在 Conners 3-P 注意力、执行功能和总体指数、BRIEF 所有综合指数以及 BOSS 运动/言语注意力不集中行为方面均有显著改善。接受 CT 治疗的儿童与对照组相比无改善。与 CT 组相比,NF 组在 Conners 3-P 执行功能、BRIEF 所有综合指数、SKAMP 注意力和 Conners 3-T 注意力不集中分量表上均有显著改善。接受 CT(8.54mg)和对照组(7.05mg)治疗的儿童的哌醋甲酯等效剂量显著增加,但接受 NF 治疗的儿童则没有(0.29mg)。
与对照组和 CT 组相比,神经反馈在 ADHD 症状改善方面有更大的优势。因此,NF 是一种有前途的 ADHD 儿童注意力训练治疗干预方法。