• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌克兰对医生服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验。

Preferences for physician services in Ukraine: a discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Danyliv Andriy, Pavlova Milena, Gryga Irena, Groot Wim

机构信息

School of Public Health, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 2015 Oct-Dec;30(4):346-65. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2239. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1002/hpm.2239
PMID:24399636
Abstract

Evidence on preferences of Ukrainian consumers for healthcare improvements can help to design reforms that correspond to societal priorities. This study aims to elicit and to place monetary values on public preferences for out-patient physician services in Ukraine. The method of discrete choice experiment is used on a sample of 303 respondents, representative of the adult Ukrainian population. The random effect logit model with interactions provides the best fit for the data and is used to calculate the marginal willingness to pay (MWTP) for quality and access improvements. At a sample level, there is no clear preference to pay formally rather than informally or vice versa. We also do not find that visiting a general practitioner is preferred over direct access to a medical specialist. However, there are differences between population groups. Quality-related attributes of physician services appear important to respondents, especially the attitude of medical staff. Thus, interpersonal aspects of out-patient care should be given priority in decisions about investments in quality improvements. Other aspects, that is social quality and access, are important as well but their improvement brings fewer social gains. Measures should be taken to eradicate the informal payment channels and to strengthen the gate-keeping role of primary care.

摘要

有关乌克兰消费者对医疗改善偏好的证据有助于设计符合社会优先事项的改革。本研究旨在引出乌克兰公众对门诊医生服务的偏好并赋予其货币价值。离散选择实验方法应用于303名受访者的样本,该样本代表乌克兰成年人口。带有交互项的随机效应logit模型最适合该数据,并用于计算质量和可及性改善的边际支付意愿(MWTP)。在样本层面,没有明显倾向于选择正式付费而非非正式付费,反之亦然。我们也没有发现看全科医生比直接看专科医生更受青睐。然而,不同人群之间存在差异。医生服务中与质量相关的属性对受访者似乎很重要,尤其是医务人员的态度。因此,在决定质量改善投资时,门诊护理的人际方面应被优先考虑。其他方面,即社会质量和可及性也很重要,但它们的改善带来的社会收益较少。应采取措施根除非正式支付渠道,并加强初级保健的守门作用。

相似文献

1
Preferences for physician services in Ukraine: a discrete choice experiment.乌克兰对医生服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2015 Oct-Dec;30(4):346-65. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2239. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
2
Preferences of Bulgarian consumers for quality, access and price attributes of healthcare services-result of a discrete choice experiment.保加利亚消费者对医疗服务质量、可及性和价格属性的偏好——离散选择实验的结果
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017 Jan;32(1):e47-e71. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2325. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
3
Preferences heterogeneity of health care utilization of community residents in China: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.中国社区居民医疗服务利用的偏好异质性:一项陈述偏好离散选择实验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 18;20(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05134-4.
4
Preference of primary care patients for home-based healthcare and support services: a discrete choice experiment in China.基层医疗患者对居家医疗保健和支持服务的偏好:中国的一项离散选择实验
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;12:1324776. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1324776. eCollection 2024.
5
Societal preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.澳大利亚生育治疗的社会偏好:基于选择的离散选择实验。
J Med Econ. 2019 Jan;22(1):95-107. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1549055. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
6
Hospital service quality - patient preferences - a discrete choice experiment.医院服务质量——患者偏好——一项离散选择实验。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Aug 13;31(7):676-683. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2017-0006.
7
Willingness to pay for physician services at a primary contact in Ukraine: results of a contingent valuation study.乌克兰初级保健医生服务支付意愿:一项条件价值评估研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 8;13:208. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-208.
8
Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.德国居家和社区长期护理服务偏好的离散选择实验研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1213-1223. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0968-0. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
9
Societal preferences for rheumatoid arthritis treatments: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.类风湿性关节炎治疗的社会偏好:来自离散选择实验的证据。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Oct;54(10):1816-25. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev113. Epub 2015 May 18.
10
Calculating Preference Weights for the Labor and Delivery Index: A Discrete Choice Experiment on Women's Birth Experiences.计算分娩指数的偏好权重:一项关于女性分娩经历的离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2015 Sep;18(6):856-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the choice of National Health Insurance Fund contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya: A qualitative study.评估肯尼亚国家健康保险基金选择签约的门诊医疗机构:一项定性研究。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2023 Sep;38(5):1555-1568. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3693. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
2
Informal payments by patients, institutional trust and institutional asymmetry.患者的非正式支付、机构信任与机构不对称
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:1015208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015208. eCollection 2022.
3
Not just money: what mothers value in conditional cash transfer programs in India.
不仅仅是金钱:印度母亲对有条件现金转移计划的重视。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003033.
4
Exploring determinants of health provider choice and heterogeneity in preference among outpatients in Beijing: a labelled discrete choice experiment.探讨北京门诊患者选择卫生服务提供者的决定因素和偏好异质性:一项标记离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e023363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023363.
5
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.