• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开放手术切除胃胃肠道间质瘤的Meta分析

Laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zheng Lijun, Ding Weixing, Zhou Donglei, Lu Liesheng, Yao Le

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, P.R. China.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2014 Jan;80(1):48-56.

PMID:24401515
Abstract

We conducted our meta-analysis to compare outcomes between laparoscopic resection and open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) from all published comparative studies in the literature. Databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, and CNKI, were searched to identify studies comparing outcomes after laparoscopic resection and open resection for gastric GISTs. The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1. Eleven comparative studies comprising 495 patients were identified. Patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of gastric GISTs were found to have similar operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD], 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], -16.01 to 11.43; P = 0.74) and complications rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.58; P = 0.46). Less intraoperative blood loss (WMD, -55.91; 95% CI, -90.26 to -21.56; P = 0.001), earlier passing first flatus (WMD, -0.89, 95% CI, -1.60 to -0.18; P = 0.01), earlier having the first liquid diet (WMD, -1.54; 95% CI, -2.44 to -0.64; P = 0.0008), and shorter hospital stay (WMD, -4.25; 95% CI, -5.63 to -2.88; P < 0.00001) were observed in the laparoscopic resection group. The recurrence rate was higher in the group of open resection compared with the group of laparoscopic resection (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.75; P = 0.01). Laparoscopic resection is safe and efficient in the treatment of patients with gastric GISTs as compared with open resection procedure. Laparoscopic resection may be a preferred treatment for gastric GISTs.

摘要

我们进行了荟萃分析,以比较文献中所有已发表的比较研究中,腹腔镜切除术和开放切除术治疗胃胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的疗效。检索了包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Ovid、Web of Science和中国知网在内的数据库,以确定比较腹腔镜切除术和开放切除术治疗胃GIST疗效的研究。使用RevMan 5.1进行荟萃分析。共纳入11项比较研究,涉及495例患者。结果发现,接受腹腔镜切除胃GIST的患者手术时间相似(加权平均差[WMD],2.29;95%置信区间[CI],-16.01至11.43;P = 0.74),并发症发生率也相似(比值比[OR],0.76;95%CI,0.36至1.58;P = 0.46)。腹腔镜切除组术中失血量更少(WMD,-55.91;95%CI,-90.26至-21.56;P = 0.001),首次排气时间更早(WMD,-0.89,95%CI,-1.60至-0.18;P = 0.01),首次进食流食时间更早(WMD,-1.54;95%CI,-2.44至-0.64;P = 0.0008),住院时间更短(WMD,-4.25;95%CI,-5.63至-2.88;P < 0.00001)。与腹腔镜切除组相比,开放切除组的复发率更高(OR,0.26;95%CI,0.09至0.75;P = 0.01)。与开放切除手术相比,腹腔镜切除术治疗胃GIST患者安全有效。腹腔镜切除术可能是胃GIST的首选治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术切除胃胃肠道间质瘤的Meta分析
Am Surg. 2014 Jan;80(1):48-56.
2
Laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗胃胃肠道间质瘤的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Aug;23(4):378-87. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828e3e9d.
3
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗胃胃肠间质瘤的荟萃分析。
Anticancer Res. 2013 Nov;33(11):5031-41.
4
[Meta-analysis of laparoscopic-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer].[腹腔镜辅助与开腹远端胃癌切除术的Meta分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Apr 23;93(16):1224-9.
5
Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Small Bowel Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术切除小肠胃肠道间质瘤:系统评价与Meta分析
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Jul 5;130(13):1595-1603. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.208249.
6
Laparoscopic versus open resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.腹腔镜与开放手术切除胃胃肠间质瘤的比较。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct;35(5):451-4. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31821954a7.
7
Laparoscopic surgery versus open resection in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.胃肠道间质瘤患者的腹腔镜手术与开放切除术:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2017 Sep;214(3):538-546. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.042. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
8
Laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术切除胃胃肠道间质瘤:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul 14;12:206. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-206.
9
Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放胃癌D2淋巴结清扫术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Dec;21(6):383-90. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822d02dc.
10
Long-term outcomes of treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor by laparoscopic surgery: review of the literature and our experience.腹腔镜手术治疗胃胃肠道间质瘤的长期疗效:文献综述及我们的经验
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Nov-Dec;60(128):2011-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Lap-Endo cooperative surgery (LECS) in gastric GIST: updates and future advances.腹腔镜辅助内镜下胃 GIST 手术:最新进展与未来展望。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1672-1682. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09691-z. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
2
Early experience of laparoscopic resection and comparison with open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a multicenter retrospective study.腹腔镜切除胃胃肠间质瘤的早期经验及与开放手术的比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 10;12(1):2290. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05044-x.
3
Minimally Invasive Approach to Gastric GISTs: Analysis of a Multicenter Robotic and Laparoscopic Experience with Literature Review.
胃间质瘤的微创治疗方法:多中心机器人手术和腹腔镜手术经验分析及文献综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 27;13(17):4351. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174351.
4
Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.腹腔镜与开放性手术治疗胃胃肠间质瘤的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Aug;24(8):1785-1794. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04318-6. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
5
A rare case of perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of the greater omentum.罕见的大网膜血管周上皮样细胞瘤(PEComa)病例。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun 19;16(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1407-5.
6
Minimally invasive surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.胃胃肠道间质瘤的微创手术
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec 12;2:108. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2017.11.20. eCollection 2017.
7
Evidence mapping based on systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).基于系统评价的胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)治疗干预的证据图谱。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Sep 7;17(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0402-9.
8
Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review.腹腔镜手术:一项合格的系统评价。
World J Methodol. 2015 Dec 26;5(4):238-54. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v5.i4.238.
9
Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic resection for gastric GISTs larger than 5 cm: Results from a prospective study.直径大于5cm的胃间质瘤腹腔镜切除术的可行性和安全性:一项前瞻性研究的结果
Oncol Lett. 2015 Oct;10(4):2081-2086. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3547. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
10
Endoscopic band ligation versus endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopic resection for small gastric stromal tumors.内镜下套扎术与内镜黏膜下剥离术及腹腔镜切除术治疗小胃间质瘤的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2873-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4571-5. Epub 2015 Oct 21.