Departments of 1Kinesiology; 2Orthopedics and Rehabilitation; and 3Athletics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; and 4University of Wisconsin Osteoporosis Clinical Center & Research Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Apr;28(4):884-91. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000367.
The purpose of this investigation was to (a) examine how asymmetry in lower extremity lean mass influenced force and power asymmetry during jumping, (b) determine how power and force asymmetry affected jump height, and (c) report normative values in collegiate athletes. Force and power were assessed from each limb using bilateral force plates during a countermovement jump in 167 division 1 athletes (mass = 85.7 ± 20.3 kg, age = 20.0 ± 1.2 years; 103 men and 64 women). Lean mass of the pelvis, thigh, and shank was assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Percent asymmetry was calculated for lean mass at each region (pelvis, thigh, and shank) as well as force and power. Forward stepwise regressions were performed to determine the influence of lean mass asymmetry on force and power asymmetry. Thigh and shank lean mass asymmetry explained 20% of the variance in force asymmetry (R = 0.20, p < 0.001), whereas lean mass asymmetry of the pelvis, thigh, and shank explained 25% of the variance in power asymmetry (R = 0.25, p < 0.001). Jump height was compared across level of force and power asymmetry (p > 0.05) and greater than 10% asymmetry in power tended to decrease the performance (effect size >1.0). Ninety-five percent of this population (2.5th to 97.5th percentile) displayed force asymmetry between -11.8 and 16.8% and a power asymmetry between -9.9 and 11.5%. A small percentage (<4%) of these athletes displayed more than 15% asymmetry between limbs. These results demonstrate that lean mass asymmetry in the lower extremity is at least partially responsible for asymmetries in force and power. However, a large percentage remains unexplained by lean mass asymmetry.
(a) 考察下肢瘦体重的不对称性如何影响跳跃中的力和功率不对称性;(b) 确定功率和力的不对称性如何影响跳跃高度;(c) 报告大学生运动员的正常数值。在 167 名一级运动员的反跳中,使用双侧力量平板评估了每个肢体的力和功率(质量=85.7±20.3kg,年龄=20.0±1.2 岁;男性 103 名,女性 64 名)。使用双能 X 射线吸收法评估骨盆、大腿和小腿的瘦体重。计算了每个区域(骨盆、大腿和小腿)以及力和功率的瘦体重不对称百分比。进行向前逐步回归以确定瘦体重不对称对力和功率不对称的影响。大腿和小腿的瘦体重不对称性解释了力不对称的 20%(R=0.20,p<0.001),而骨盆、大腿和小腿的瘦体重不对称性解释了功率不对称的 25%(R=0.25,p<0.001)。比较了力和功率不对称程度不同的跳跃高度(p>0.05),功率不对称大于 10%(效应量>1.0)可能会降低表现。该人群中有 95%(第 25 至 97.5 百分位数)的力不对称在-11.8%至 16.8%之间,功率不对称在-9.9%至 11.5%之间。只有一小部分(<4%)运动员的四肢之间的不对称性超过 15%。这些结果表明,下肢瘦体重的不对称性至少部分导致了力和功率的不对称性。然而,仍有很大一部分不对称性无法用瘦体重不对称来解释。