Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Unit, Santo Spirito Hospital, Rome, Italy,
Int Orthop. 2014 Feb;38(2):419-27. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2262-1. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
Bone stock reconstruction in TKR surgery is one of the biggest challenges for the surgeon. According to some, authors causes of bone stock loosening are multiple, including stress shielding, osteolysis from wear, septic or aseptic loosening, and bone loss caused by a poorly balanced implant. Moreover, bone loss may be iatrogenic at the time of implant removal, indicating that bone preservation during implant removal is critical.
Defect localization and extension affect the surgeon's decisions about the choice of the surgical technique and the type of plant to be taken. Today there are several options available for bone deficiency treatment. The treatment choice is undoubtedly linked to the cause of revision, experience and personal philosophy, but it is necessary to consider also the patient's age, expectations of life, functional requirements and bone quality. Many authors prefer bone stock reconstruction techniques in patients with high bone quality and a better quality of life with more prospects. In patients with lower lease on life and lower bone quality the best bone replacement techniques are of modular systems, wedges, and augments. In cases with septic bone loss, more or less extended, different authors recommend reducing bone grafts in favor of modular prostheses to reduce the risk of graft contamination.
All of these techniques have been shown to be durable in midterm outcomes, but concerns exist for a number of reasons, including disease transmission, resorption, fracture, immune reaction to allograft, the cost of custom prostheses, the inability to modify the construct intraoperatively and the overall technical challenge of applying these techniques.
The choice between different surgical options depends on bone defect dimension and characteristics but are also patient-related. Reestablishment of well-aligned and stable implants is necessary for successful reconstruction, but this can't be accomplished without a sufficient restoration of an eventual bone loss.
TKR 手术中的骨存量重建是外科医生面临的最大挑战之一。据一些作者称,导致骨存量松动的原因有多种,包括应力屏蔽、磨损引起的骨溶解、感染或无菌性松动以及因植入物平衡不良而导致的骨丢失。此外,在移除植入物时可能会发生医源性骨丢失,这表明在移除植入物时保存骨量至关重要。
缺陷的定位和延伸会影响外科医生对手术技术选择和所采用种植体类型的决策。如今,有几种可供选择的骨缺损治疗方法。治疗选择无疑与翻修的原因、经验和个人理念有关,但还需要考虑患者的年龄、预期寿命、功能需求和骨质量。许多作者更喜欢在骨质量高、生活质量更好、前景更乐观的患者中采用骨存量重建技术。对于预期寿命较短、骨质量较低的患者,最好采用模块化系统、楔形物和增材技术进行骨置换。对于感染性骨丢失的情况,不同作者建议根据骨丢失的程度,减少骨移植,转而采用模块化假体,以降低移植物污染的风险。
所有这些技术在中期结果中都被证明是持久的,但由于多种原因,包括疾病传播、吸收、骨折、同种异体骨免疫反应、定制假体的成本、术中无法修改构建以及应用这些技术的整体技术挑战,仍存在一些担忧。
不同手术选择的选择取决于骨缺损的尺寸和特征,但也与患者有关。为了成功重建,必须重新建立对齐良好且稳定的植入物,但如果不充分恢复最终的骨丢失,则无法实现。