Institute for Food Quality and Food Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, D-30173 Hannover, Germany.
Field Station for Epidemiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Buescheler Str. 9, D-49456 Bakum, Germany.
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Mar 1;113(4):589-98. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.12.006. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
The most important pork-borne zoonotic diseases in humans such as Salmonelloses and Yersinioses cause only latent infections in pigs. Thus, the infection of pigs does not result in apparent or palpable alterations in the pig carcasses. This is the major reason, why the traditional meat inspection with adspection, palpation and incision is not able to control the food safety risks of today. The objective of this paper is to evaluate a set of serological tests, which provides a classification of pig herds into "zoonoses risk categories" as demanded by EU law and into "herd health risk categories" by using meat juice as diagnostic specimen for ELISA tests. Serological data that were obtained by testing meat juice samples from various pig herds were analyzed as proof of the "meat juice multi-serology" concept. For that, at least 60 meat juice samples from 49 pig herds each were taken between September 2010 and March 2011 and tested for antibodies against zoonotic pathogens (Salmonella spp., Trichinella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica and Toxoplasma gondii) and against pathogens causing production diseases (Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, influenza A virus subtype H1N1, influenza A virus subtype H3N2 and PRRSV). Apparent and true animal prevalence, herd prevalence values and intra-herd seroprevalence values as well as the predictive values for the herd and the animal prevalence values were calculated for each pathogen and each of the 49 randomly selected herds. The herd seroprevalence values (one seropositive sample per herd determined a "positive herd") for Y. enterocolitica, Salmonella spp., T. gondii, M. hyopneumoniae and PRRSV were higher than 80%, respectively, for the influenza A viruses between 60% and 14% and for Trichinella spp. 0%. Although all herds were located in the same area in the Northwest of Germany within a radius of 250 km, the intra-herd seroprevalence values for all tested pathogens, except for Trichinella spp., varied remarkably from herd to herd. In the case of Y. enterocolitica and T. gondii the intra-herd seroprevalence values varied even from zero to 100%. This shows that a serological risk categorization of pig herds regarding zoonoses and production diseases is meaningful if used for risk-based decisions in the framework of the new meat inspection concept and as part of the herd health management system. Thus, the development of a cost-efficient, time- and labour-saving test system for simultaneously detecting various antibodies should be the next step for an extensive implementation of the meat juice multi-serology concept.
人类最重要的食源性人畜共患病,如沙门氏菌病和耶尔森菌病,只会在猪体内引起潜伏感染。因此,猪的感染不会导致猪胴体出现明显或可察觉的变化。这就是为什么传统的肉眼检查、触诊和剖检无法控制当今的食品安全风险的主要原因。本文的目的是评估一组血清学检测方法,这些方法根据欧盟法律将猪群分为“人畜共患病风险类别”,并根据使用肉汁作为酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测标本将猪群分为“群体健康风险类别”。使用来自不同猪群的肉汁样本进行检测获得的血清学数据证明了“肉汁多重血清学”概念的合理性。为此,在 2010 年 9 月至 2011 年 3 月期间,从 49 个猪群中每个猪群至少采集了 60 份肉汁样本,并对其进行了针对人畜共患病病原体(沙门氏菌、旋毛虫、小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌和刚地弓形虫)和引起生产疾病的病原体(猪肺炎支原体、甲型 H1N1 流感病毒、甲型 H3N2 流感病毒和 PRRSV)的抗体检测。针对每个病原体和 49 个随机选择的猪群,计算了每种病原体的明显和真实动物流行率、猪群流行率值和猪群内血清流行率值以及猪群和动物流行率值的预测值。除了旋毛虫,小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌、沙门氏菌、刚地弓形虫、猪肺炎支原体和 PRRSV 的血清流行率值(每个猪群确定一个“阳性猪群”的一个血清阳性样本)分别高于 80%,而甲型 H1N1 流感病毒的血清流行率值在 60%到 14%之间,旋毛虫为 0%。尽管所有的猪群都位于德国西北部同一地区,半径为 250 公里以内,但除旋毛虫外,所有检测病原体的猪群内血清流行率值差异显著。在小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌和刚地弓形虫的情况下,猪群内血清流行率值甚至从 0 到 100%不等。这表明,如果将其用于新的肉品检验概念框架内的基于风险的决策,并作为群体健康管理系统的一部分,对人畜共患病和生产疾病的猪群进行血清学风险分类是有意义的。因此,开发一种经济高效、省时省力的同时检测多种抗体的检测系统,应该是广泛实施肉汁多重血清学概念的下一步。