• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

级联效应:威胁注意偏向对模糊信息解释的影响。

Cascading effects: the influence of attention bias to threat on the interpretation of ambiguous information.

机构信息

Child Development Laboratory, Department of Human Development, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 2011 Apr;49(4):244-51. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2011.01.004
PMID:21353663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3163843/
Abstract

Both attention bias to threat and negative interpretive bias have been implicated in the emergence and maintenance of anxiety disorders. However, relations between attention and interpretive biases remain poorly understood. The current study experimentally manipulated attention bias to threat and examined the effects of attention training on the way ambiguous information was interpreted. Results suggest that the preferential allocation of attention towards threat affects the manner in which ambiguous information is interpreted. Individuals trained to attend to threat were more likely than individuals in a placebo training group to interpret ambiguous information in a threat-related manner. These data suggest that perturbations in the initial stages of information processing associated with anxiety may lead to a cascade of subsequent processing biases.

摘要

注意偏向和负性解释偏向都与焦虑障碍的出现和维持有关。然而,注意和解释偏向之间的关系还知之甚少。本研究通过实验操纵注意偏向,考察了注意训练对模糊信息解释方式的影响。结果表明,对威胁的注意力偏向会影响模糊信息的解释方式。与安慰剂训练组相比,接受威胁注意训练的个体更有可能以威胁相关的方式来解释模糊信息。这些数据表明,与焦虑相关的信息处理初始阶段的干扰可能导致随后的一系列处理偏差。

相似文献

1
Cascading effects: the influence of attention bias to threat on the interpretation of ambiguous information.级联效应:威胁注意偏向对模糊信息解释的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2011 Apr;49(4):244-51. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
2
Trained interpretive bias and anxiety.训练有素的解释性偏差与焦虑。
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Feb;45(2):329-40. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
3
Interpretation bias for uncertain threat: A replication and extension.对不确定威胁的解释偏差:一项重复与扩展研究。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;51:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
4
Do anxious parents interpretive biases towards threat extend into their child's environment?焦虑的父母是否会将对威胁的解释偏见延伸到孩子的环境中?
Behav Res Ther. 2009 Feb;47(2):170-4. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.11.005. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
5
Asymmetrical transfer effects of cognitive bias modification: Modifying attention to threat influences interpretation of emotional ambiguity, but not vice versa.认知偏差修正的不对称转移效应:改变对威胁的注意力会影响对情绪模糊性的解读,但反之则不然。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;54:239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
6
Threat processing in generalized social phobia: an investigation of interpretation biases in ambiguous facial affect.广泛性社交恐惧症中的威胁加工:对模糊面部情绪的解释偏差的研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Jun 30;217(1-2):100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.031. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
7
Attention bias towards negative emotional information and its relationship with daily worry in the context of acute stress: An eye-tracking study.急性应激背景下对负面情绪信息的注意偏向及其与日常担忧的关系:一项眼动追踪研究。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Mar;90:96-110. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
8
The effect of cognitive bias modification for interpretation on avoidance of pain during an acute experimental pain task.认知偏误修正对解释的影响对急性实验性疼痛任务中疼痛回避的影响。
Pain. 2014 Aug;155(8):1569-1576. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 9.
9
Short-term serotonergic but not noradrenergic antidepressant administration reduces attentional vigilance to threat in healthy volunteers.短期给予血清素能而非去甲肾上腺素能抗抑郁药会降低健康志愿者对威胁的注意力警觉性。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Mar;12(2):169-79. doi: 10.1017/S1461145708009164. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
10
Interpretation bias in the face of pain: a discriminatory fear conditioning approach.面对疼痛时的解释偏差:一种歧视性恐惧条件作用方法。
Scand J Pain. 2019 Apr 24;19(2):383-395. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0112.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between growth mindset and cognitive fusion in college students is mediated by bias towards negative information.大学生成长型思维与认知融合之间的关系由对负面信息的偏向所介导。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 11;10(14):e34445. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34445. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
2
Prefrontal control of superior colliculus modulates innate escape behavior following adversity.前额叶皮层对上丘的控制调节了逆境后先天的逃避行为。
Nat Commun. 2024 Mar 9;15(1):2158. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46460-z.
3
An Integrative Model of Youth Anxiety: Cognitive-Affective Processes and Parenting in Developmental Context.青少年焦虑的综合模型:发展背景下的认知-情感过程和教养方式。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2023 Dec;26(4):1025-1051. doi: 10.1007/s10567-023-00458-z. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
4
How Official Social Media Affected the Infodemic among Adults during the First Wave of COVID-19 in China.官方社交媒体如何影响中国 COVID-19 第一波疫情期间成年人中的信息疫情。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 31;19(11):6751. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116751.
5
Introduction to the Special Issue: Interplay of Family Factors and Cognitive-Affective Processes in Youth.特刊介绍:家庭因素与青少年认知情感过程的相互作用。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2022 Mar;25(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s10567-022-00394-4. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
6
CBM-I Training and Its Effect on Interpretations of Intent, Facial Expressions, Attention and Aggressive Behavior.基于计算机的心智化干预训练及其对意图解读、面部表情、注意力和攻击性行为的影响。
Eur J Psychol. 2021 May 31;17(2):13-27. doi: 10.5964/ejop.2413. eCollection 2021 May.
7
Efficacy of the Chinese version interpretation bias modification training in an unselected sample: A randomized trial.中文版解释偏向修正训练在未选择样本中的疗效:一项随机试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 28;16(7):e0255224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255224. eCollection 2021.
8
Validating a mobile eye tracking measure of integrated attention bias and interpretation bias in youth.验证一种用于测量青少年综合注意偏向和解释偏向的移动眼动追踪方法。
Cognit Ther Res. 2020 Jun;44(3):668-677. doi: 10.1007/s10608-019-10071-6. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
9
Exposure therapy for pediatric irritability: Theory and potential mechanisms.儿童烦躁的暴露疗法:理论与潜在机制。
Behav Res Ther. 2019 Jul;118:141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
10
Longitudinal Relations between Behavioral Inhibition and Social Information Processing: Moderating Role of Maternal Supportive Reactions to Children's Emotions.行为抑制与社会信息加工之间的纵向关系:母亲对儿童情绪的支持性反应的调节作用。
Soc Dev. 2018 Aug;27(3):571-585. doi: 10.1111/sode.12286. Epub 2018 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive biases in anxiety and attention to threat.焦虑和对威胁的注意中的认知偏差。
Trends Cogn Sci. 1997 Dec;1(9):340-5. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01092-9.
2
Interpretation training influences memory for prior interpretations.解释训练影响先前解释的记忆。
Emotion. 2010 Dec;10(6):903-7. doi: 10.1037/a0020232.
3
Enhanced neural reactivity and selective attention to threat in anxiety.焦虑症患者的神经反应增强和对威胁的选择性注意。
Biol Psychol. 2010 Oct;85(2):252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.07.010. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
4
The effect of single-session interpretation modification on attention bias in socially anxious individuals.单次口译修正对社交焦虑个体注意偏向的影响。
J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Mar;24(2):178-82. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
5
Neural plasticity in response to attention training in anxiety.注意训练对焦虑症的神经可塑性影响。
Psychol Med. 2010 Apr;40(4):667-77. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709990766. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
6
Affective primes suppress attention bias to threat in socially anxious individuals.情感启动会抑制社交焦虑个体对威胁的注意偏向。
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Jul;46(7):799-810. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.03.011. Epub 2008 Mar 29.
7
Plasticity in attention: implications for stress response in children.注意力的可塑性:对儿童应激反应的影响
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Apr;46(4):450-61. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.01.012. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
8
Interpretation biases in social anxiety: response generation, response selection, and self-appraisals.社交焦虑中的解释偏差:反应生成、反应选择和自我评估。
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Jul;45(7):1505-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.01.006. Epub 2007 Feb 4.
9
Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study.焦虑个体与非焦虑个体中与威胁相关的注意偏向:一项元分析研究。
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jan;133(1):1-24. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1.
10
Inducing a benign interpretational bias reduces trait anxiety.诱导良性解释偏差可降低特质焦虑。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;38(2):225-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Dec 1.